September 28, 2020 | News | No Comments
A group of lawmakers has expressed official concern over President Donald Trump’s media diet.
“We are concerned about the process by which you receive information,” Democrats on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology wrote (pdf) to Trump on Thursday, describing the president as “vulnerable to misinformation and fake news.”
The letter cited Politico reporting from earlier this week, which revealed that deputy national security advisor K.T. McFarland at one point “had given Trump a printout of two Time magazine covers. One, supposedly from the 1970s, warned of a coming ice age; the other, from 2008, about surviving global warming, according to four White House officials familiar with the matter.”
According to Politico, “Trump quickly got lathered up about the media’s hypocrisy. But there was a problem. The 1970s cover was fake, part of an internet hoax that’s circulated for years. Staff chased down the truth and intervened before Trump tweeted or talked publicly about it.”
Such incidents have “been a recurring issue with your administration,” the Democrats wrote in their letter Thursday. “You previously made the false claim that President [Barack] Obama ordered your phones to be ‘tapped’ based on false reports which have subsequently been contradicted by senior U.S. intelligence officials. You also falsely stated that millions of votes were cast against you ‘illegally’ after reading about subsequently-debunked ‘research’ pushed by alt-right websites. This, by no means, is a comprehensive list of your activities peddling fake news.”
And “where scientific policy is concerned,” this pattern is especially troubling to the lawmakers, who noted that under Trump, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)—established in 1976 “to provide the president and others within the executive office of the president with advice on the scientific, engineering, and technological aspects of the economy, national security, homeland security, health, foreign relations, the environment, and the technological recovery and use of resources, among other topics,” according to its website—has been left “largely unstaffed and without a director.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT