Month: November 2019

Home / Month: November 2019

8 Ways to Reduce Global Inequality

November 22, 2019 | News | No Comments

Click:face painting

Extreme economic inequality is corrosive.

It makes poverty reduction harder, hurts our economies, and drives conflict and violence. Reversing this trend presents a significant challenge, but one where we’ve seen some progress. Below we offer eight ways to move the world forward in reducing global inequality.

1. A Check on Illicit Outflows

In developing countries, inadequate resourcing for health, education, sanitation, and investment in the poorest citizens drives extreme inequality.

One reason is tax avoidance and other illicit outflows of cash. According to Global Financial Integrity, developing countries lost $6.6 trillion in illicit financial flows from 2003 through 2012, with illicit outflows increasing at an average rate of 9.4 percent per year. That’s $6.6 trillion that could reduce poverty and inequality through investments in human capital, infrastructure, and economic growth.

2. A Progressive Income Tax

After falling for much of the 20th century, inequality is worsening in rich countries today. The top 1 percent is not only capturing larger shares of national income, but tax rates on the highest incomes have also dropped.

How much should the highest income earners be taxed? This is obviously a question to be decided domestically by citizens, and opinions differ. For instance, economist Tony Addison suggests a top rate of 65 percent rate on the top 1 percent of incomes.

Click Here: Newcastle United Shop

3. A Global Wealth Tax

In Capital in the Twenty-first Century, Thomas Piketty recommends an international agreement establishing a wealth tax.

Under his plan, countries would agree to tax personal assets of all kinds at graduated rates. The skeptics do have a point about whether this particular plan is practical, but we shouldn’t give up on the idea. Because wealth tends to accumulate over generations, fair and well-designed wealth taxes would go a long way towards combating extreme inequality.

4. A Living Wage

Governments should establish and enforce a national living wage. Corporations should also prioritize a living wage for their own workers and for the suppliers, buyers, and others with whom they do business.

Low and unlivable wages are a result of worker disempowerment and concentration of wealth at the top — hallmarks of unequal societies. As human beings with basic needs, all workers should earn enough to support themselves and their families. Governments and corporations should be responsible for protecting the right to a living wage, and corporations should commit to responsible behavior that respects the dignity of all workers.

5. The Right to Organize

The right of workers to organize has always been a cornerstone of more equal societies, and should be prioritized and protected wherever this basic right is violated.

Extreme inequality requires the disempowerment of workers. Therefore, the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively for better pay and conditions is a global human rights priority. Despite Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — which declares the right to organize as a fundamental human right — workers worldwide, including in the United States, still face intimidation, fear, and retribution for attempting to organize collectively.

Where unions are strong, wages are higher and inequality is lower.

6. An End to Labor Abuses

Companies worldwide are also replacing what was once permanent and stable employment with temporary and contingent labor.

Often called “contingent” or “precarious” workers, these workers fill a labor need that is permanent while being denied the status of employment. In the United States, this trend is called “misclassification,” in which employers misclassify workers as “independent contractors” when they are actually employees.

Contingent labor also occurs through outsourcing, subcontracting, and use of employment agencies.

7. An Open and Democratic Trade Policy

Negotiating international trade agreements behind closed doors with only bureaucrats and corporate lobbyists present has to end. These old-style trade agreements are fundamentally undemocratic and put corporate profits above workers, the environment, health, and the public interest. We need a new, transparent trade policy that is open, transparent, and accountable to the people.

8. A New Economics?

Economists are often imagined as stuffy academics who value arcane economic theory above humanitarian values. Clinging to these parsimonious theories gave us the “Washington Consensus” and a global financial system that imploded in 2008.

Thankfully, there’s a movement among economics grad students and scholars to reimagine the discipline. As they acknowledge, we clearly need a new economics that works to improve the lives of everyone, not just those already well off.

For instance, what could be more radical than a Buddhist economics? This is the path promoted by economist and Rhodes Scholar E .F. Schumacher, who says humanity needs an economics that creates wealth for all people, just not money for privileged people and corporations. Economics should take into account ethics and the environment, and treat its claims less like invariable truths.

Marjorie Elizabeth (“Betsy”) Wood serves as Economic Policy Associate and Managing Editor of Inequality.org at the Institute for Policy Studies.

Dr. Nick Galasso is an American Council of Learned Societies Public Fellow, serving Oxfam America as a research and policy advisor. He leads Oxfam’s work on economic inequality.

Read More

Palmer makes way for Sainz at Renault after Japan!

November 22, 2019 | News | No Comments

Jolyon Palmer will leave the Renault team after Sunday’s Japanese Grand Prix, with Carlos Sainz racing for the French outfit in Austin.

The British driver announced the news himself on his Instagram social media account.

“Tomorrow’s Japanese GP will be my last race for Renault,” wrote the 26-year-old.

“With my grid penalty I’ll be starting near the back but I will be giving it my all as always. Thanks everyone for the support during the last 2 years, it means a lot!”

  • Sainz ‘smiling’ over Renault’s rapidly improving pace

Renault confirmed Palmer’s departure and Sainz’s immediate switch to the French outfit for the US Grand Prix.

“I would like to thank Jolyon for his commitment to the team and his professionalism,” said Renault boss Cyril Abiteboul in a statement.

“Since Renault’s return to Formula 1, Jolyon has been highly dedicated in an evolving environment. He has shown great personal qualities and we wish him all the best in his future career.”

Sainz’s move would likely prompt Toro Rosso to bring back Dany Kvyat for the US Grand Prix to race alongside Pierr Gasly if the French driver decides to miss the Super Formula finale in Japan which clashes with the Austin race.

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: Crystal Palace Shop

FIA to allow current F1 cars at demo events in 2018

November 22, 2019 | News | No Comments

Click:上海服务器维修

The FIA’s World Motor Sport Council has approved a change to the F1’s sporting regulations which will allow teams to use current-spec cars for demo runs at public events.

F1 has been restricted up to now from using their latest cars in special events such as London’s F1 Live which took place in July before the British GP.

A current provision in the sporting rules permitting just a short, maximum 15 km run over the course of two days for current cars between the end of the season and the end of the calendar year is destined to cater to the needs of a championship winning team and its celebration agenda.

  • F1 working on exhaust microphone to boost TV volume

Teams usually conduct demo runs with old machinery, but next year they will be able to use 2018 cars in demo events organised by Formula 1’s Commercial Rights Holder.

The 15 km limit will remain however, and the rules specify that “no such demonstrations may take place on track configurations currently approved for use by Formula 1 cars.”

After London’s popular F1 Live celebration around Trafalgar Square in July, F1 CEO Chase Carey said there would likely be more events of the sort in the future in major cities of countries hosting a Grand Prix.

Click Here: Golf special

Cost cap proposals holding Haas back, says Steiner

November 22, 2019 | News | No Comments

Haas F1 Team principal Guenther Steiner says that he needs to know more details about Liberty Media’s proposal to introduce a cost cap into Formula 1.

He said that uncertainty over what will happen is already affecting the team’s own plans for its short- and medium-term future.

Steiner feels he can’t make vital decisions on expanding the team if the cost cap ends up limiting recruitment and overall budgets.

Click Here: France Football Shop

“We’ve already started this process at about mid-season when we discussed we were still up and down and needed to settle,” he explained.

“At the moment we want to stop because we want to see what Liberty Media comes up with for the cost cap,” he continued. “Why would we grow a team for one or two years then to dismantle it again?

“With the cost cap coming in we don’t really know where to go. At the moment I don’t want to grow any bigger after our next step.

“Once we know where the sport is going then we can react but there is no point to react now and then counter-react a year later.

  • Steiner: Haas’ 2017 points don’t show the whole picture

“Next year will go and if you recruit again after that, it is for 2019,” he noted. “You might need to go smaller a year later.

“When the cost cap is here, if there are no negatives then we can grow and have growing pains rather than the pain of letting people go.”

In the meantime, Steiner said that Haas would simply have to make do with the resources and personnel that it already had in place.

“We have to manage better the people we have at the moment,” he concluded. “After next year we will know more about the new direction of the sport.

Steiner added that he didn’t intend to be critical of Liberty, and appreciated their difficult position resolving this and many other issues facing the sport.

“It is very difficult to get 10 teams who are different in their structures, ambitions and why they are in the sport to get them together on common ground,” Steiner said.

“Liberty is working hard at it,” he acknowledged. “I think they will work diligently. I hope by the middle of next year we’ll have some answers.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Zero tolerance.

That’s what the United Nations, health professionals, and those who advocate for women and girls say is necessary to end female genital mutilation (FGM), a practice that still plagues millions of women and girls around the world, reflecting deep-rooted inequality between sexes and extreme discrimination against women and children.

“In every country, whether legal or not, medical providers who perform FGM are violating the fundamental rights of girls and women.”
—Joint statement from UNFPA, UNICEF, International Confederation of Midwives, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Friday marks the UN’s International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, following what the Guardian describes as “12 months of historic change and growing awareness of the practice.” 

The focus of this year’s commemoration is on the troubling ‘medicalization’ of FGM, a trend in which healthcare providers engage in the practice, in turn lending their tacit approval. Around one in five girls have been cut by a trained health-care provider, they say, with that number going as high as three in four girls in some countries.

In a statement, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called on health workers around the world to eliminate what he called a “deeply harmful” practice, which is concentrated in about 29 countries in Africa and the Middle East. The UN claims FGM is a violation of both children’s and women’s rights to health, security, freedom from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and the right to life when the procedure results in death.

“If everyone mobilized—women, men and young people—it is possible, in this generation, to end a practice that currently affects some 130 million girls and women in 29 countries where we have data,” said the Secretary-General. “I call for all people to end FGM and create the future we want where every girl can grow up free of violence and discrimination, with full dignity, human rights and equality.”

According to the UN, the practice has no medical benefits, yet harms girls and women in many ways. It involves removing and damaging healthy and normal female genital tissue, and interferes with the natural functions of girls’ and women’s bodies.

Immediate complications can include severe pain and bleeding, shock, infection, and injury to nearby genital tissue. Long-term consequences can include recurrent bladder and urinary tract infections, cysts, infertility, an increased risk of childbirth complications and newborn deaths, and the need for later surgeries.

“Health workers… have a deep understanding of the harmful consequences of this practice,” read a joint statement from the UN Population Fund, UNICEF, the International Confederation of Midwives, and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, which came together on Friday to issue a call to action for health workers around the world to mobilize against FGM. “And, they also witness the emotional wounds FGM inflicts, trauma which often lasts a lifetime.”

“Female genital mutilation violates the human rights and undermines the health and well-being of some 3 million girls each year,” said the statement. “FGM is illegal in many countries, and medical providers who perform it in these places are breaking the law. But in every country, whether legal or not, medical providers who perform FGM are violating the fundamental rights of girls and women.”

Prevalence in the United States

The Guardian revealed separately on Thursday that 500,000 women in the U.S. are estimated to be at risk of or have been subjected to FGM—three times more than previously thought.

The findings were based on unpublished draft figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, seen by the Guardian and supported by new statistics from the non-profit Population Reference Bureau released Friday.

The newspaper reported:

The extent of female genital mutilation in the US has been exposed following pressure from campaigners, including a global campaign against FGM led by Jaha Dukureh, a 25-year-old mother from Atlanta, who was cut as a baby in her home country of Gambia. With the backing of the Guardian, Dukureh launched a petition last May successfully calling for a new prevalence study into FGM and for a working group to be set up.

“This is a huge moment—once we have proper data we can really start taking first steps to end FGM in the US,” said Dukureh. “I haven’t seen the CDC study but these draft figures appear to prove what we already knew: FGM is an American problem; we can’t keep on ignoring it; we can’t afford to leave these girls at risk.”

In 2014, the U.K. hosted the first ‘Girl Summit’ in London to tackle FGM and early forced marriage, while the Obama administration announced it would carry out a study to establish how many women are living with the consequences of FGM and how many girls are at risk in the U.S. 

Late last month, a doctor became the first person in Egypt to be convicted of FGM, seven years after the procedure was criminalized in the country where an estimatedThe doctor was convicted of manslaughter in the case of a 13-year-old girl who died after undergoing FGM. The international human rights group Equality Now called the ruling a “monumental victory.”

Click Here: France Football Shop

Kevin Magnussen has promised to go all-out for a big result in the final Grand Prix of the year next weekend at Abu Dhabi.

“We have nothing to lose going into Abu Dhabi,” said the Haas driver. “We just have to go for it. It’s going to be exciting.

“It’s been a really good season,” he continued. “I’ve had the most fun racing that perhaps I’ve ever had!

“I think we could’ve had a little more to show with a bit more luck, but it’s been a really enjoyable season.

“In terms of results, we could’ve gotten more out of it,” he admitted. “I would’ve liked to have had a few more good results. I think they were definitely in the cards, but just didn’t happen for different reasons.

“Performance has been there to score big points on a few occasions, but we’ve missed out due to bad luck or reliability issues.”

Magnussen has finished in the points on five occasions this year. His best result was seventh place in the Azerbaijan Grand Prix.

“It’s hard for people to see what progress is being made from the outside,” he said. “A lot of the stuff doesn’t pay off straight away.

“A lot of the stuff you improve and develop. It’s about the little steps, and when you do a thousand of them, you make progress and the benefits become visible.

  • Steiner: Haas’ 2017 points don’t show the whole picture

“Each time you make a step, it’s not always visible. I can certainly see from the inside how we’re building up and improving. There’s still a long way to go and I’m happy I’m a part of it.”

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

Magnussen has already been confirmed with a race seat at Haas for 2018. It’s the first time in his Formula 1 career that he’s had that sort of continuity and security.

“It’s a good feeling going into the season with the team and an idea of a car that I know from a season already. I’m very much looking forward to that,” he said. “It’s going to be interesting.

“We’ve designed a strong car. The baseline of our car is very competitive. We just need to try and improve our understanding of the car and our operation of the car.

“[The aim is to] extract the performance out of it in every condition, every temperature and every track.”

He’s certainly aware that there will be little time fir him to put his feet up over the winter off-season.

“It’s the time of year where you actually work the hardest, at least in terms of your training,” he said. “You don’t have any races to prepare for, so you can push yourself a bit more and really build up your fitness over the winter.

“Obviously, it’s nice to get a break from all the travelling, but it doesn’t take long before you start missing racing again.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Martin Brundle wants a tough, no-compromise approach from Liberty Media on Formula 1’s future regulations, for the purpose of making Grand Prix racing great again.

Formula 1’s new owners are wrapping up their first year at the helm of the sport, and while F1 has only seen minor changes to date, Liberty is hard at work defining the future beyond 2021, when the current regulation agreements expire.

Sky F1’s popular pundit, whose opinion is often valued, believes the only path to success for the pinnacle of motorpsort is a regulation platform which prioritizes ‘fast and scary’ cars raced by the greatest drivers in the world.

“They have got to be bold,” Brundle said of Liberty Media, speaking to Sky F1.

“They have got to say ‘this is the future of Formula 1, this is the direction we’re going in, join up or depart’. And they’ve got to be really clear on that.”

  • Brown: ‘We need to be less critical of Liberty’

A veteran of 158 Grand Prix starts, the former F1 driver says Liberty needs to pull out all the stops, but admits the sport’s owners are walking on a risky political tightrope.

“We have to be the fastest, the scariest, the best racing cars with the finest drivers wheel to wheel,” adds Brundle.

“The objective is very easy, and I actually think getting there is relatively easy, but there’s just an awful lot of politics and self-interest in the way. So I don’t know where it is going to end up.”

Case in point: Ferrari’s toughened stance on the future as expressed in no uncertain terms by chairman Sergio Marchionne, who simply threatened to quit F1 if it at some point it no longer caters to the Scuderia’s best interests.

Brundle however is willing to call Marchionne’s bluff.

“I think they’re bluffing,” he said.

“For example, where would Ferrari go? Go and get their backsides handed to them on a plate by Mahindra in Formula E?

“They are already in Le Mans, they won the GT world championship – nobody knows about that.

“They do no advertising around the world, not a penny, because Formula 1 does it for them. So I believe Liberty have to be super tough.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: kenzo online españa

McLaren’s significant upgrade package to its MCL33, set to be introduced in Spain, will center around the car’s all new front wing and nose.

While the Woking-based outfit has enjoyed a step-up in performance this season, mainly thanks to its Renault-powered engine, the team is still racing at a considerable distance from F1’s trio of front-runners.

McLaren fielded an interim car in the first four races of the year, with a more refined and evolved version of the MCL33 set to be unveiled this weekend, and one which will hopefully prove considerably faster in a straight line, McLaren’s weak point so far in 2018.

“There were two working groups over the winter,” said a McLaren source.

“One was tasked with a basic test car for the Renault engine, while the other worked on the actual aerodynamic concept. That had to be held off until the new nose was ready.”

    McLaren wrong to make ‘we have the best car’ claims – Button

Indeed, according to Germany’s Auto Motor und Sport, the most striking feature of the updated car will be its radical front end.

“The most striking detail will be the new nose,” said well-informed correspondent Michael Schmidt.

“The crash test was passed on April 11. Rumour has it that the design is pretty spectacular.

“It’s quite possible that McLaren says goodbye to the stub nose, perhaps doing something similar to Force India and Mercedes.”

Both Fernando Alonso and McLaren racing director Eric Boullier have played down expectations however, as the majority of the field will be introducing updates at the Circuit de Catalunya this week.

“Barcelona is an opportunity to try some new things, see where we are and the direction we will take for the rest of the season,” said Alonso.

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: Cheap FIJI Rugby Jersey

“The future is here, it’s just not evenly distributed.” – J.G. Ballard

The climate crisis often presents us with postcards from our possible futures. In a brilliant investigation last October for BuzzFeed, Amanda Chicago Lewis told the story of prisoners in California who are being used to combat the out-of-control wildfires that have gripped the state over the course of the last year, and paid a fraction of the minimum wage. Lewis tells the story of Demetrius Barr, a nonviolent drug offender who expresses complex emotions about his circumstances. On the one hand, he describes the firefighting work as a chance to escape the dehumanizing confinement and restricted motion of an indoor prison. On the other hand, he was earning less than $2.00 a day and compared the exploitative economics of his situation to slavery (a comparison, Lewis notes, that is common among prisoners working in the California brush).

Reading this account, I was uncomfortably reminded of my visit to Louisiana in the summer of 2010, when I was preparing an article on the BP Deepwater Horizon explosion. Near the shore, the humid southern air was completely saturated with the smell of oil. Rows of sweaty, unsmiling workers in identical uniforms—who were nearly all Black, as far as I could see—were laying down barriers along the shoreline, resembling the barracks of an ecological trench war. They were sub-sub-subcontractors who had been hired to clean up the spill, recruited from parish prisons and for-profit incarceration centers across the state.

Click Here: ADELAIDE CROWS 2019 MEN’S HOME GUERNSEY

 

In 2010, we witnessed prison labor being used to mitigate the inevitable disasters that accompany the energy industry’s mad rush to exploit the most extreme resources; now, in California, we are witnessing prison labor being advanced as a solution to the climate chaos that fossil fuels inevitably produce.

What vision of the future does the American prison system represent? Most fundamentally, it is one based on the systemic oppression of people of color. In her groundbreaking book The New Jim Crow, law professor Michelle Alexander explains how the war on drugs—which supplies the prison system with half of its prisoners—grew out of a racist strategy to secure working-class white votes. Alexander points out that Reagan’s war on drugs actually preceded the outbreak of crack cocaine, and represented the apotheosis of a Republican effort to paint Black people as criminal “others”: “The war on drugs, cloaked in race-neutral language, offered whites opposed to racial reform a unique opportunity to express their hostility toward Blacks and Black progress, without being exposed to the charge of racism.”

This strategy worked to devastating effect—today, an African-American man is six times more likely to be incarcerated than a white man despite using and selling drugs at roughly equal rates. This has led many thinkers like Alexander, along with activist groups like Critical Resistance, to emphasize that the American prison system functions primarily as a tool of racial and economic control. Indeed, it both requires and reinforces American racism—by profiting from the notion that black and brown bodies inherently deserve incarceration (manifested in draconian detention and sentencing practices by police and judges, which The New Jim Crow documents at length), and by ripping apart the economic and social fabric of Black communities and thereby creating the conditions of “danger” and “lawlessness” that so terrify white Americans in the first place.

The prison industrial complex thereby helps to prop up the ideology that allows us to accept the slow-moving, global disaster of climate change—a disaster that will most drastically impact the poor and communities of color around the world. Simply put, working for real and viable climate solutions means addressing structural racism and exploitation. Alicia Garza, cofounder of the #BlackLivesMatter movement, explains this principle elegantly: “When black people get free, everybody gets free.”  The climate movement, therefore, has an obligation to directly challenge the vision of the future represented by the prison system, both as an insidious instrument of the racism and exploitation that threatens all of us and as a mammoth humanitarian disaster in its own right.

This is the time to do so. The prison industrial complex depends on a perpetual stream of black and brown prisoners, which in turn depends on racist, militarized, and unaccountable policing; the machinery of this system has been increasingly exposed as the authorities fail again and again to indict police murderers of people of color. In New York City, where I live, climate activists from a range of organizations and ideologies are taking to the streets alongside hundreds of thousands of others who are outraged over the murders of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Nizah Morris and far too many others. Over the last few months we have been lucky to have many voices explaining WHY climate activists must stand in solidarity with those protesting police murders. HOW is a question with many answers, but one that many are already addressing, and that will continue to be tackled in a variety of ways as these protests continue (recognizing the historically white composition of the mainstream environmental movement as a whole, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Bay Area Solidarity Action Team’s protocols for white supporters as an important part of exploring these answers).

As with the struggle against climate change, fighting the prison industrial complex involves taking on powerful economic interests. The Corrections Corporation and the GEO Group, the two largest private prison companies in the US, made 3.3 billion dollars in revenue in 2012 alone—and a range of other actors profit from cheap prison labor, which represents an attractive resource for those looking to avoid pesky things like unions and minimum wage requirements and is increasingly the solution of choice for American companies such as Walmart. Rather than create jobs for poor communities, which might hinder the accumulation of capital or shift power to the working class, these interests are pursuing a vision of society that would see disadvantaged individuals cycled through prisons, their labor severed from any economic or political costs.

There is an alternative vision of our future behind the climate fight, and it is wholly incompatible with the prison industrial complex. As Stanford’s Mark Jacobson has outlined, we could power the world on 100% renewable energy within a few decades, but to do so would essentially require a global public works program unprecedented in human history. In other words, it would entail putting huge numbers of people to work, and rejecting the doctrine of futility that characterizes our current approach to both the climate crisis and unemployment. Such a “Marshall Plan for the Earth” would build not only the labor power but also the political power of the poor and communities of color—the very constituents currently being oppressed by the prison system, and on whose disenfranchisement its continued expansion depends. Both justice and survival demand that we make this vision a reality.

Patrick Robbins is a writer, researcher and activist based in Brooklyn. He is currently working with Sane Energy Project toward the goal of an entirely renewable New York, and was an active member of Occupy The Pipeline from 2012 to 2014. Follow him on Twitter: @patrickopticon

Read More

Williams stars hail Sir Frank’s achievements

November 21, 2019 | News | No Comments

A new video from Mobil 1 The Grid sees some big names from the 40-year history of Williams F1 paying homage to the team’s iconic founder, Sir Frank Williams.

“I think Frank is a big racer,” said current driver Felipe Massa. “The only thing that he thinks is about racing, about just being the best. He’s really a nice character as well.

“It is a team that’s really a joy to work for,” He added. “It is a very family thing. I’m really proud to be part of his team, but also part of his history!”

Massa joined the team for the 2014 season. He retired at the end of last year only to be recalled when Valtteri Bottas headed to Mercedes over the winter.

Dickie Stanford’s association with Williams goes back much further. He joined Williams as Nigel Mansell’s race mechanic in 1985. He rose to the position of chief mechanic in 1990 and then became team manager in 1995.

“We call him Mr Motor Racing,” said Stanford, who stayed in the post for ten years. he remains a long-time friend and colleague of Sir Frank’s to this day.

“He is living, breathing motor racing,” Standford said. “Whatever happened yesterday, forget that – it doesn’t matter. It’s tomorrow. What are we thinking about tomorrow. And that’s been driven through the whole team by Frank.

“He is the leader of the team, pushing the team forward for what’s new tomorrow.”

  • Wehrlein ‘absolutely in contention’ at Williams – Lowe

“What a character he is,” added former chief technical officer Pat Symonds, who left the team at the end of last year. He had joined in 2013, having previously worked for Benetton, Renault and Virgin. He’s now a technical expert for Sky Sports F1.

“This independent team has been going for so long, operating at the front line,” Symonds said. “Frank’s held it together, and really a figurehead for the whole of the team. And the whole of the company.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: Golf Equipment Online