Month: November 2019

Home / Month: November 2019

A political declaration from the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, aimed at achieving global gender equality by 2030, “lacks ambition,” according to nearly 1,000 women’s rights and feminist organizations from around the world.

In the document, which was formally adopted on Monday, world governments pledge to: bolster implementation of laws related to gender equality; bolster institutions vital to women’s empowerment; transform discriminatory norms and stereotypes; close resource gaps; boost accountability; and enhance capacities and data to track progress.

“The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels.”
—Lydia Alpízar, Association for Women’s Rights in Development

But a coalition of groups working to advance the human rights of women and girls say the declaration is milquetoast and must be strengthened.

“The text of the political declaration is weak and does not go far enough towards the transformative change that is needed for gender equality,” said Lydia Alpízar, executive director of the Association for Women’s Rights in Development, in a speech Monday. “We, women of the world in all our diversity, deserve much better than this. We deserve that you put aside your ideological, political and religious differences and fully recognize and affirm the human rights of women and girls and gender justice. Nothing less.”

A joint statement issued by 974 groups blasts the UN declaration as “a bland reaffirmation of existing commitments” that “threatens a major step backward” in the realm of women’s rights. The organizations also decry the lack of transparency around the crafting of the declaration, which they claim is the result of “several months of closed-door negotiations” from which women’s groups were largely excluded.

“[M]any of the gains that women and girls have made are under threat and women and girls worldwide face extraordinary and unprecedented challenges, including economic inequality, climate change and ocean acidification, and rising, violent fundamentalisms,” reads the statement. “At a time when urgent action is needed to fully realize gender equality, the human rights and empowerment of women and girls, we need renewed commitment, a heightened level of ambition, real resources, and accountability.”

Specifically, the groups are calling for stronger language that:

  • Recognizes the critical and unequivocal role women’s organizations, feminist organizations and women human rights defenders have played in pushing for gender equality, the human rights and empowerment of women and girls. The attempt of governments to marginalize the role of these groups is an affront to women, everywhere.
  • Ensures real accountability for governments including detailed measures to reform and strengthen public institutions to address the structural causes of gender inequality; ensuring an enabling economic environment for women’s rights and gender equality beyond sector-specific financing and gender-responsive budgeting; and more.
  • Recognizes the links between the human rights of women and girls and development. The Political Declaration must reaffirm the links between the human rights of women and girls and development, particularly as women and girls disproportionately are affected by the consequences of under-development.

Even Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, who heads UN Women—the standing body that oversees the Commission on the Status of Women—acknowledged portions of the critique even as she championed the goals of the declaration. 

“Yes, much has been done, and much of it worthwhile. However, what we chose to prioritize and act on has not led to irreversible and deep-rooted change,” she said in her opening speech to the Commission.

Her remarks echo the findings of a UN Women report (pdf), also issued Monday, which declares that 20 years after the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action—which stated that “women’s empowerment and their full participation on the basis of equality in all spheres of society, including participation in the decision-making process and access to power, are fundamental for the achievement of equality, development and peace”—progress has been spotty to say the least. 

“Twenty years on, it is a hard truth that many of the same barriers and constraints that were recognized by the Beijing signatories are still in force globally,” Mlambo-Ngcuka wrote in the report’s introduction. “Change has not been deep enough, nor comprehensive, and it is not irreversible.”

Alpízar, of the Association for Women’s Rights in Development, was more scathing in her assessment:

“[T]oday we must acknowledge that progress achieved has been very limited,” she said before the Commission. “The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels.”

Click Here: true religion jean short

She concluded: “This is the moment; there are important opportunities before us. This is the moment when we must have all resources needed—the political commitment and the action—to achieve real transformations.”

As part of his quest to improve racing in the future, Ross Brawn is looking at track layouts to determine if changes which could impact the competition are necessary.

Formula 1’s Sporting boss says that all tracks aren’t created equal when it comes to encouraging wheel to wheel racing, and a thorough analysis of what makes a great venue is underway.

“The aerodynamic programme is now starting to pick up pace, and the work on circuit development is happening,” said Brawn, referring to recent work on aerodynamics which would allow for cars to follow each other more closely.

“We have already got engaged with some circuits about possible modifications to improve racing.”

  • Brawn aiming to recruit three new carmakers into F1

Brawn says he and his team are looking to the sport’s past for answers about the future.

“We have started looking in our archives,” he said.

“Were there periods of racing where there was more overtaking? Are there tracks where there is more overtaking? So you can do a statistical analysis.

“The thing you have to be careful of is that overtaking isn’t good racing. You have got to start to think about what is good racing – and it is two cars fighting each other.

“It may mean the guy in front stays in front but you can have some great racing going on. It is a little bit more complex than the number of overtakes, counting the number of overtakes.

“What we are seeing so far is the ability to take different lines through corners is quite important to help racing.

“So if you have got a hairpin and it is a narrow track, it is not that great. If you have a hairpin and it is a wide track, where there can be some different lines going into it, then you can get something happening.

“Austin, I think, would fall into the category of where there is a complex of corners.

“So, you take a line on one corner going in, and then you start to force the defending car to start taking different lines. And then eventually you come out in the right place.

“That is what we are looking at.”

Click Here: Kenzo Women’s New Collection

Brawn also underlined the important role played by a track’s surface in promoting close racing, with low degradation asphalt often a negative factor.

“The surface is quite important to the racing because the type of surface can create degradation and a reasonable degree of tyre degradation is helpful to racing because you start to get performance differentials,” he said.

“It doesn’t want to be the band aid to fix it. But if you look at circuits with very low degradation, like Sochi, the racing there is challenging and it is one stop.

“The tyres don’t go off, so away you go. There are no performance differentials created.

“If you look at some of the great races we have had this year, there have often been tyres involved in terms of degradation levels, so the guy defending – like [Kimi] Raikkonen, defending on tyres that were not as good as the tyres Max [Verstappen] had attacking him.

“The surface is quite a factor in terms of the racing you get.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

An international group of women activists, including Gloria Steinem and two Nobel Peace laureates, on Sunday crossed the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) between North and South Korea in a call for global peace and reconciliation.

“We are walking for a peaceful world, we are walking for a peaceful world,” the activists sang as they crossed one section of the heavily fortified two-mile-wide zone.

WomenCrossDMZ hit a brief roadblock when the activists were denied an attempt to walk across the final stretch, but they were able to make the crossing by bus.

“Not only have we received the blessing for our historic crossing, we’ve gotten both Korean governments to communicate. That is a success,” one of the Nobel Peace laureates, Leymah Gbowee, who was recognized in 2011 for her role in Liberian peace movement, told CBS News.

The event was formed to “call for an end to the Korean War and for a new beginning for a reunified Korea,” the organizers state on their website. They continue:

2015 marks the 70th anniversary of Korea’s division into two separate states by Cold War powers, which precipitated the 1950-53 Korean War. After nearly 4 million people were killed, mostly Korean civilians, fighting was halted when North Korea, China, and the United States representing the UN Command signed a ceasefire agreement. They promised within three months to sign a peace treaty; over 60 years later, we’re still waiting.

Sunday’s event also includes forums in Pyongyang and Seoul for Korean women to share their experiences of being split apart from their families and for the activists to discuss mobilizing women for an end to the conflict.

Some South Korean protesters were critical of the march, saying the activists did not do enough to point out human rights abuses carried out by the North Korean government, but WomenCrossDMZ said the action had a different focus.

Click Here: st kilda saints guernsey 2019

“This is about human relationships, this is about us seeing our common humanity in each other,” Mairead Maguire, who received the Nobel in 1976 for her work in ending the conflict in Northern Ireland, said at a press conference on the southern side of the inter-Korean border.

“We are trying to make person-by-person connections so that there is understanding and accuracy,” Steinem said at the press conference. “We feel very celebratory and positive that we have created a voyage across the DMZ in peace and reconciliation that was said to be impossible.”

Lowe explains why Massa decided to bow out

November 21, 2019 | News | No Comments

Williams’ chief technical officer Paddy Lowe has been talking about why Felipe Massa decided to retire at the end of 2017.

Massa originally left the sport at the end of last season. He was recalled by the team after Valtteri Bottas departed over the winter to join Mercedes.

He went on to enjoy a good season. The 36-year-old finished level on points with Renault’s Nico Hulkenberg – but only three ahead of his own rookie team mate Lance Stroll. Even so, he had appeared keen to stay with at Grove in 2018.

With Sergey Sirotkin, Robert Kubica, Pascal Wehrlein, Daniil Kvyat and Paul di Resta all rumoured to be in the running to take over the seat next year, Massa sought some sort of definite decision from the team. Unfortunately, they weren’t in a position to give him the assurance he needed.

“The selection of the drivers is a very complicated process,” Lowe explained. “There are lots of different factors we’re taking into account.

“With the timing of it all, Felipe needed a decision before Brazil,” he told Motorsport.com. “We weren’t able to.

“He was still in the running and was a strong candidate,” Lowe added. “But we weren’t able to make that commitment at that point.

“So we agreed that he would drop out of considerations and retire from the team.”

  • Massa handed new post-F1 role with FIA

Lowe has been one of Massa’s most enthusiastic supporters this year, calling him “solid and dependable”, adding that Massa had been “a tremendous support to Lance.”

He insisted that the Brazilian had played a crucial role in the team’s development in 2017.

“He was a great reference for [the performance of the FW40],” Lowe pointed out. “You always need a good reference somewhere in the garage.

“Felipe has provided that reference at every race actually, and that’s been really valuable.

“There haven’t been days where he’s been lost,” he added. “[He’s always] been able to give a reference for Lance, and I think that’s also quite remarkable.”

Massa announced his decision to retire for good from Grand Prix racing at the start of November. He enjoyed an emotional last home race in Brazil, and a successful sign-off in the season finale at Abu Dhabi.

He plans to continue racing in stock car and karting events closer to home. He’s also just been appointed the new head of the FIA’s CIK/International Karting Commission.

Williams has postponed its decision over who will take over from Massa until January. It’s believed that Sirotkin is all-but assured of taking the role.

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Even with a historic political victory in his pocket after seeing his nation vote overwhelmingly against the imposition of further austerity in exchange for a new loan package from foreign creditors on Sunday, Yanis Varoufakis, the outspoken finance minister of Greece’s Syriza-led government, announced his resignation on Monday morning. 

Tweets from https://twitter.com/commondreams/lists/greek-crisis

In a statement posted to his personal blog, Varoufakis said he “shall wear the creditors’ loathing with pride” after it was made clear to him that his “absence” from future talks was urged by negotiating members of the so-called Troika—the European Commission, European Central Bank, and International Monetary Fund.

“Soon after the announcement of the referendum results, I was made aware of a certain preference by some Eurogroup participants, and assorted ‘partners’, for my… ‘absence’ from its meetings; an idea that the Prime Minister [Alexis Tsipras] judged to be potentially helpful to him in reaching an agreement. For this reason I am leaving the Ministry of Finance today,” he stated. “I consider it my duty to help Alexis Tsipras exploit, as he sees fit, the capital that the Greek people granted us through yesterday’s referendum.”

Varoufakis described Sunday’s vote as “a unique moment when a small European nation rose up against debt-bondage,” and said he would continue to fully support Tsipras, the next finance minister, and the Greek government overall. “The superhuman effort to honour the brave people of Greece, and the famous OXI (NO) that they granted to democrats the world over, is just beginning,” he declared.

What is now essential for Greece, Varoufakis said, is that “the splendid NO vote be invested immediately into a YES to a proper resolution – to an agreement that involves debt restructuring, less austerity, redistribution in favour of the needy, and real reforms.”

“The Greeks are saying YES to sustainable reconstruction and growth of their economic structures and to reduce military spending. Above all, they are saying YES to mandatory negotiations on debt restructuring, including a haircut. They are saying YES to European integration and YES to European democracy.”
—Gabi Zimmer, GUE/NGL

Gabi Zimmer, president of the European leftist coalition GUE/NGL, mirrored Varoufakis’ sentiments by saying now that Greece has made it clear what they say ‘No’ to, it is now equally important to recognize what they are saying ‘Yes’ to.

“The NO in the referendum means the Greeks are saying YES to a socially just distribution of the burdens for the sustainable reforms necessary in their country to fight corruption and nepotism,” explained Zimmer. “They are saying YES to sustainable reconstruction and growth of their economic structures and to reduce military spending. Above all, they are saying YES to mandatory negotiations on debt restructuring, including a haircut. They are saying YES to European integration and YES to European democracy.”

Offering a mid-day breakdown of the latest developments, the Guardian reports:

The scale of yesterday’s No vote has stunned Europe this morning, as leaders prepare for Tuesday’s emergency summit.

Italy’s Matteo Renzi has just posted on Facebook that Europe must find permanent solution to the Greek crisis and go beyond austerity.

But European Commission vice-president Valdis Dombrovskis has warned that the No vote makes the situation even more complicated.

Click Here: Geelong Cats Guernsey

Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande are due to meet tonight in Paris to discuss the crisis. UK prime minister David Cameron has already held a meeting in London to discuss the impact on Britain response.

The Greek banking system continues to creak after a week of capital controls; some ATM machines are now only dispensing €50 per day, rather than the €60 limit.

With congratulations to the Greek people being expressed from around the world in the wake of the vote, what comes next for the nation remains anything but clear. As eurozone ministers plan for a meeting slated for Tuesday, it was reported that Tsipras has already been on the phone with ECB president Mario Draghi. Bank officials are said to be convening a teleconference later in the day to discuss their next move.

As Yves Smith writes at Naked Capitalism, “the key party to watch to see whether the lenders are prepared to soften their stance much is the ECB. The central bank is to decide today whether to increase the ELA [an emergency funding program], which is a necessary step for the punishing bank holiday to come to an end. Varoufakis had promised Greek banks would open no matter what on Tuesday. It’s hard to see how they could given that even cash itself is running scarce.”

It was also reported by Reuters that Tsipras will be speaking by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin, raising familiar speculation about financial assistance from Moscow should the Troika members remain stubborn to Greek’s demand for debt relief and other new loan conditions.

For many, of course, the critical question is whether the Troika members will now bend to the democratic voice of the Greek people and offer a new deal that could be accepted by the Syriza-led government. And if not, what becomes of Greece—and is an exit from the eurozone the only likely option?

Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the Dutch finance minister who is also president of the Eurogroup, said on Monday that his ongoing desire is to keep Greece within the eurozone.

“That is their goal, and still mine,” he told reporters on his way to The Hague on Monday. “But we will have to see if it happens.”

However, citing the historic examples of Iceland and Argentina—two nations in recent years who have defaulted on unsustainable debt in order to save their economies—Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, in his New York Times column on Monday, argued: “Unless Greece receives really major debt relief, and possibly even then, leaving the euro offers the only plausible escape route from its endless economic nightmare.”

And, he adds, “let’s be clear: if Greece ends up leaving the euro, it won’t mean that the Greeks are bad Europeans. Greece’s debt problem reflected irresponsible lending as well as irresponsible borrowing, and in any case the Greeks have paid for their government’s sins many times over. If they can’t make a go of Europe’s common currency, it’s because that common currency offers no respite for countries in trouble. The important thing now is to do whatever it takes to end the bleeding.”

The men who line up on the Formula 1 grid are the best drivers in the world, but sometimes things to go according to plans.

We’ve put together a gallery of all the thrills and spills, mishaps and crashes of the 2017 season.

All pictures are from our partners, XPB and WRI2.

53

You may also like

Japanese GP: Friday’s action in pictures

Japanese GP: Thursday’s build-up in pictures

Russian GP: Sunday’s action in pictures

Russian GP: Saturday’s action in pictures

Russian GP: Friday’s action in pictures

Russian GP: Thursday’s build-up in pictures

 

Read More

In the middle of the Pacific Ocean, a team of Greenpeace activists has boarded an Arctic-bound drilling vessel owned by the Shell oil company.

“I’m just one voice out here, but I know I’m not alone, and millions if not billions of voices demanding the right to safe and healthy lives will have a huge chance of changing things.” —Johno SmithApproximately 750 miles north-west of Hawaii, the team of six campaigners intercepted the ship—which they’ve been tracking across the Pacific since last month—and scaled the 38,000 ton drilling platform which is being hauled by a larger transportation vessel. According to Greenpeace, its campaigners will set up camp on the underside of the rig’s main deck and are equipped with supplies to last for several days and technology which will allow them to communicate with supporters around the world in real-time, despite being hundreds of miles from land.

#TheCrossing Tweets

Named the Polar Pioneer, the Shell drilling rig is destined for the Chukchi Sea, off the coast of Alaska, where the company—despite the enormous risks posed to the fragile region and the global outcry calling for a ban on Arctic drilling—intends to begin exploratory drilling later this year. According to Greenpeace, its international team of activists—including campaigners from the USA, Germany, New Zealand, Australia, Sweden and Austria—landed on the larger ship transporting the Polar Pioneer, the 700-foot long heavy-lift vessel called the Blue Marlin, using inflatable boats launched from the Greenpeace ship Esperanza, which has been following the 400 foot vessel for weeks.

Aliyah Field, one of the six, tweeted from the Polar Pioneer: “We made it! We’re on Shell’s platform. And we’re not alone. Everyone can help turn this into a platform for people power! #TheCrossing.”

Johno Smith from New Zealand, another one of the six, said: “We’re here to highlight that in less than 100 days Shell is going to the Arctic to drill for oil. This pristine environment needs protecting for future generations and all life that will call it home. But instead Shell’s actions are exploiting the melting ice to increase a man-made disaster. Climate change is real and already inflicting pain and suffering on my brothers and sisters in the Pacific.”

The group, according to a statement, has plans to hang a banner from the ship that includes millions of names from people around the world who have signed onto petitions objecting to oil or gas drilling in the Arctic.

As Smith continued, “I believe that shining a light on what Shell is doing will encourage more people to take a strong stand against them and other companies who are seeking to destroy this planet for profit. I’m just one voice out here, but I know I’m not alone, and millions if not billions of voices demanding the right to safe and healthy lives will have a huge chance of changing things.”

Shell spokesperson Kelly op de Weegh, in a statement, called the boarding of its ship by Greenpeace “illegal” and said that “these stunts” would not “distract from preparations underway” to begin its  drilling operations in the Arctic, which she described as a “safe and responsible exploration program.”

“It is unconscionable that the federal government is willing to risk the health and safety of the people and wildlife that live near and within the Chukchi Sea for Shell’s reckless pursuit of oil,” said Marissa Knodel, a climate campaigner with Friends of the Earth, at the time. “Shell’s dismal record of safety violations and accidents, coupled with the inability to clean up or contain an oil spill in the remote, dangerous Arctic waters, equals a disaster waiting to happen.”

Click Here: United Kingdom Rugby Jerseys

It’s good and right that we commemorate the mass killing in the Ottoman Empire during World War I of between 500,000 and 1.5 million Armenians.   

 

Many nations now call the slaughter of 1915-1916 as “genocide.” This week the 100th anniversary of the notorious event was observed.   Pope Francis and the European parliament called on Turkey to recognize the killings as genocide.

 

Turkey, successor to the Ottoman Empire, admits many Armenians were killed in WWI, but rejects the label of “genocide,” saying their deaths occurred in the confusion of war, not by design.  The United States, a very close ally of Turkey, avoids  the “g” word. Interestingly, Israel does too, perhaps not wanting to detract from the genocide Jews  suffered in WWII. 

 

Armenians insist the Ottoman authorities were determined to eradicate the ancient Armenian people. Turks claim that Armenian guerilla bands known as “dashnaks” acted as a fifth column for their bitter foe, Russia, which was attacking the crumbling Ottoman Empire.  Large numbers of Armenian civilians were herded from their homes in eastern Turkey, across the mountains, and into the wastes of northern Syria.

 

The greatest loss of life occurred on these “death marches,” a fact that Turkey accepts.  What is rarely stated by either side is that Kurdish tribesmen inflicted a significant number of deaths, pillage and rape on the helpless Armenian deportees.

 

Modern Turkey is determined to avoid being branded with the shame of genocide because it tends to demote the bearer to a second-rate nation forever begging forgiveness, like eternally cringing Germany.   

 

But what really galls the Turks is being singled out as genocidal mass killers when so many other similar perpetrators are ignored.  

 

Begin with Spain, which wiped out its Muslim population then inflicted mass murder on West Indian native islanders, then in its Latin American colonies.   No one even remembers the Arawak Indians, for example, wiped out by the Spaniards, British, and French.

 

In the United States, the mass killing and ethnic cleansing of its  native people is a horrific crime rarely talked about today.  Here, the historic record is loud and clear, unlike that of the chaotic Ottoman Empire.  White-men’s diseases finished off what bullets and starvation failed to accomplish.

 

Why don’t we commemorate Stalin’s ghastly solution to independent-minded Ukrainians?  During 1932-33,  the Soviet secret police murdered by bullets and famine six million or more Ukrainians – the Holdomor.  

 

Not long after, Roosevelt and Churchill allied themselves to the author of this historic crime, Stalin, who killed four times more people than Adolf Hitler. His crimes against Jews and other peoples are widely recognized and commemorated.  No one today in the West commemorates Stalin’s murder of many millions of Soviet citizens.

 

Nor is the plight of East Europe’s ethnic Germans recalled. Between 1945-1948, 12 million were expelled at gunpoint from their ancestral homes, 500,000-600,000 being killed in the process. The majority came from former German territory annexed by Poland, the USSR, and Czechoslovakia.

 

Largely unknown was the genocide of the Soviet Union’s Muslims. Some four millions were murdered or starved to death under Stalin’s orders.   Stalin, a Georgian or Ossetian, hated Muslims with the same ferocity that Hitler hated Jews – but he was a US-British ally. 

 

Next, the  “Mfakane.” During the 1820’s,  the Zulu moved south into what is today South Africa,  slaughtering 1-2 million local tribesmen.  It’s worth noting that the Dutch-Flemish Boer inhabitants of the Cape were there long before the Zulu, who dominated today’s South Africa.  Belgium’s mass murders in its Congo colony are branded genocide by some historians.

 

A million or more Cambodians were slaughtered by the demented, Maoist Khmer Rouge.    The details of the murder of up to one million communists in Indonesia during a 1965-1966 US-backed coup  remain obscure.

 

History is filled with forgotten genocides – all part of our inhumane tribal culture.   So blame the Turks, but don’t forget all the other mass killers.

Eric Margolis is a columnist, author and a veteran of many conflicts in the Middle East. Margolis recently was featured in a special appearance on Britain’s Sky News TV as “the man who got it right” in his predictions about the dangerous risks and entanglements the US would face in Iraq. His latest book is American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World.

Read More

Western journalists claim that the big lesson they learned from their key role in selling the Iraq War to the public is that it’s hideous, corrupt and often dangerous journalism to give anonymity to government officials to let them propagandize the public, then uncritically accept those anonymously voiced claims as Truth. But they’ve learned no such lesson. That tactic continues to be the staple of how major US and British media outlets “report,” especially in the national security area. And journalists who read such reports continue to treat self-serving decrees by unnamed, unseen officials – laundered through their media – as gospel, no matter how dubious are the claims or factually false is the reporting.

We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message!

Common Dreams is a not-for-profit news service. All of our content is free to you – no subscriptions; no ads. We are funded by donations from our readers. This media model only works if enough readers pitch in. We have millions of readers every month and, it seems, too many take our survival for granted. It isn’t. Our critical Mid-Year fundraiser is going very slow – only 503 readers have contributed a total of $19,000 so far. We must raise $31,000 more before we can end this fundraising campaign and get back to focusing on what we do best.
If you support Common Dreams and you want us to survive, we need you.
Please make a tax-deductible gift to our Mid-Year Fundraiser now!

We now have one of the purest examples of this dynamic. Last night, the Murdoch-owned Sunday Times published their lead front-page Sunday article, headlined “British Spies Betrayed to Russians and Chinese.” Just as the conventional media narrative was shifting to pro-Snowden sentiment in the wake of a key court ruling and a new surveillance law, the article (behind a paywall: full text here) claims in the first paragraph that these two adversaries “have cracked the top-secret cache of files stolen by the fugitive US whistleblower Edward Snowden, forcing MI6 to pull agents out of live operations in hostile countries, according to senior officials in Downing Street, the Home Office and the security services.”

Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership

Read the full column on The Intercept.

Glenn Greenwald is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, constitutional lawyer, commentator, author of three New York Times best-selling books on politics and law, and a staff writer and editor at First Look media. His fifth and latest book is, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State, about the U.S. surveillance state and his experiences reporting on the Snowden documents around the world. Prior to his collaboration with Pierre Omidyar, Glenn’s column was featured at Guardian US and Salon.  His previous books include: With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the PowerfulGreat American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican PoliticsA Tragic Legacy: How a Good vs. Evil Mentality Destroyed the Bush Presidency, and How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values from a President Run Amok. He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, a George Polk Award, and was on The Guardian team that won the Pulitzer Prize for public interest journalism in 2014.

Read More

Click:Piping bag making machine

Award-winning Uruguayan writer and thinker Eduardo Galeano, considered a leading voice of Latin America’s left, has died at 74.

The world-renowned author, who had been diagnosed with lung cancer, died in Montevideo on Monday.

The novelist and journalist—whose work transcended genre and who once said “all written work constitutes literature, even graffiti”—was the prolific author of books including Memory of Fire, a three-volume narrative of the history of North and South America; The Book of Embraces, described by Library Journal as a “literary scrapbook, mixing memoir, documentary, essay, and prose poem”; and The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent, which analyses five centuries of economic and political exploitation in the region, perpetrated first by Europe and later by the United States.

The last book brought Galeano into the spotlight 36 years after its original publication, when in 2009 the late Hugo Chavez, then president of Venezuela, gave President Barack Obama a paperback copy.

Galeano, a regular contributor to The Progressive and the New Internationalist, was a powerful critic of both capitalism and imperialism in every form.

“This world is not democratic at all,” Galeano told the Guardian in 2013. “The most powerful institutions, the IMF [International Monetary Fund] and the World Bank belong to three or four countries. The others are watching. The world is organized by the war economy and the war culture.”

According to Reuters:

Galeano started out as a journalist in the 1960s, writing ‘Open Veins’ at a time when he said his cattle-producing country “produced more violence than meat or wool.”

Following a coup in 1973 and the banning of the book, he fled to neighboring Argentina. When that country’s military dictatorship began its ‘dirty war’ against leftists in 1976, he went into exile again, this time in Spain.

He returned to Montevideo in 1985.

Galeano’s most recent book, published in 2012, was Children of the Days: A Calendar of Human History. Reviewer Ian Sansom wrote that Children of the Days was “the ne plus ultra of the Galeano style and form, a triumph of his mosaic art—365 sad and strange and shiny little fragments, placed adjacent to one another to form a vast and seemingly coherent whole. All of Galeano’s usual obsessions are vividly represented here: U.S. imperialism, the pharmaceutical industry, western governments, the military, the church, advertising, business, Hollywood.”

Describing that book, as well as Galeano’s overall career, Greg Grandin wrote in the New York Times: “Think of Pablo Neruda crossed with Howard Zinn.”

In the wake of Galeano’s passing, progressive writer and editor Tom Engelhardt, who served as American editor for the Memory of Fire trilogy (Pantheon Books) and Upside Down (Metropolitan Books), mused on the author’s legacy:

Eduardo Galeano ended his history of everything, Mirrors, with these lines, “In my childhood, I was convinced that everything that went astray on earth ended up on the moon. But the astronauts found no sign of dangerous dreams or broken promises or hopes betrayed. If not on the moon, where might they be? Perhaps they were never misplaced. Perhaps they are in hiding here on earth. Waiting.”  

I hope that, like the betrayed dreams he spent his lifetime recording and the voices of the oppressed and the bold that he retrieved so movingly from the discard pile of mainstream history to inspire the rest of us, Galeano, who just died, is still in hiding somewhere on earth, or even on the moon, waiting.

In this 2009 GritTV interview with Laura Flanders, Galeano reads from and discusses The Open Veins of Latin America:

Others commemorated Galeano’s death on Twitter:

Tweets about #eduardogaleano lang:en