Month: November 2019

Home / Month: November 2019

To address the major and growing global threat that stems from rampant overuse and misuse of antibiotics in agriculture, the World Health Organization (WHO) this week issued its first-ever formal guidelines instructing farmers to stop using so many antimicrobials in healthy livestock.

“As important as these guidelines are, they are just that—guidelines. To help curb resistance, individual companies and/or countries actually have to take action on them.”
—David Wallinga, NRDC

“If no action is taken today, by 2050, almost all current antibiotics will be ineffective in preventing and treating human disease, and the costs of losing these drugs will exceed U.S. $100 trillion in terms of national productivity,” the U.N. agency predicts in a related policy brief (pdf).

David Wallinga, a senior health officer at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), said the guidelines “may be a game-changer in this fight,” because they call for “fairly significant changes to how many of the world’s biggest food-animal producers now operate, including the U.S.”—but “as important as these guidelines are, they are just that—guidelines. To help curb resistance, individual companies and/or countries actually have to take action on them.”

The U.S.-based advocacy group Center for Food Safety (CFS) welcomed the guidelines, while also noting how they “illustrate the degree to which our regulators and large food animal producers are falling short.”

Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019

Cameron Harsh, CFS’s senior manager for organic and animal policy, called on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reconsider its support for using antibiotics on livestock for disease prevention, urging the FDA to “better align domestic policies with the WHO and to take stronger measures to restrict and reduce use of antibiotics in food animals raised in the U.S.”

The WHO guidelines reflect growing concerns about the amount of antibiotics used in agriculture, and what that means for both humans and animals in the long term.

As Kazuaki Miyagishima, director of the WHO’s Department of Food Safety and Zoonosesn, explains: “the volume of antibiotics used in animals is continuing to increase worldwide, driven by a growing demand for foods of animal origin,” and “scientific evidence demonstrates that overuse of antibiotics in animals can contribute to the emergence of antibiotic resistance.”

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warns that “a lack of effective antibiotics is as serious a security threat as a sudden and deadly disease outbreak.”

“Driven by the need to mitigate the adverse human health consequences of use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals,” the guidelines (pdf) include four recommendations:

  • An overall reduction in use of all classes of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals;
  • Complete restriction of use of these antimicrobials in food-producing animals for growth promotions;
  • Complete restriction of use for prevention of infectious diseases that have not yet been clinically diagnosed; and
  • Antimicrobials classified by the WHO as “highest priority critically important” for human medicine should not ever be used to treat food-producing animals, while antimicrobials classified as “critically important” should not be used to control the dissemination of an infection within a group of food-producing animals.

Since 2005, WHO has published a list of antimicrobials categorized as “important,” “highly important,” or “critically important” to human medicine, with the goal of preserving the effectiveness of available antibiotics. The latest revision (pdf) was published in April 2017.

The guidelines also feature two best practice statements. In the first, the WHO declares that “any new class of antimicrobials or new antimicrobial combination developed for use in humans will be considered critically important for human medicine unless otherwise categorized by WHO.”

The second statement advises that “medically important antimicrobials that are not currently used in food production should not be used in future production including food-producing animals or plants,” acknowledging that although the guidelines focus on livestock rather than plants, using antibiotics on plants also contributes to antimicrobial resistance that can be transferred to humans.

The guidelines were released just ahead of U.S. Antibiotic Awareness Week—an annual effort by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to raise awareness about antibiotic resistance—which begins November 13. The CDC found that as of 2013, more than 2 million Americans are infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria each year, and about 23,000 of those people die because of the infection.

When the Aztecs founded Tenochtitlán in 1325, they built it on a large island on Lake Texcoco. Its eventual 200,000-plus inhabitants relied on canals, levees, dikes, floating gardens, aqueducts and bridges for defense, transportation, flood control, drinking water and food. After the Spaniards conquered the city in 1521, they drained the lake and built Mexico City over it.

The now-sprawling metropolis, with 100 times the number of inhabitants as Tenochtitlán at its peak, is fascinating, with lively culture, complex history and diverse architecture. It’s also a mess. Water shortages, water contamination and wastewater issues add to the complications of crime, poverty and pollution. Drained and drying aquifers are causing the city to sink—almost 10 meters over the past century!

“Conquering” nature has long been the western way. Our hubris, and often our religious ideologies, have led us to believe we are above nature and have a right to subdue and control it. We let our technical abilities get ahead of our wisdom. We’re learning now that working with nature—understanding that we are part of it—is more cost-effective and efficient in the long run.

Had we designed cities with nature in mind, we’d see fewer issues around flooding, pollution and excessive heat, and we wouldn’t have to resort to expensive fixes. Flooding, especially, can hit people hard in urban areas. According to the Global Resilience Partnership, “Floods cause more damage worldwide than any other type of natural disaster and cause some of the largest economic, social and humanitarian losses”—accounting for 47 percent of weather-related disasters and affecting 2.3 billion people over the past 20 years, 95 percent of them in Asia.

As the world warms, it’s getting worse. Recent floods in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Nepal have affected more than 40 million people, killing more than 1,000. One-third of Bangladesh is under water. In Houston, Texas, Hurricane Harvey has killed dozens and displaced thousands, shut down oil refineries and caused explosions at chemical plants. Some say it’s one of the costliest “natural” disasters in U.S. history.

 

Although hurricanes and rain are natural, there’s little doubt that human-caused climate change has made matters worse. More water evaporates from warming oceans and warmer air holds more water. Climate change is also believed to have held the Houston storm in place for longer than normal, and rising sea levels contributed to greater storm surges.

A lax regulatory regime that allows developers to drain wetlands and build on flood plains has compounded Houston’s problems. The city has no zoning laws, and many wetlands and prairies—which normally absorb large amounts of water and prevent or lessen flood damage—have been drained, developed or paved over. President Donald Trump also rescinded federal flood protection standards put in place by the Obama administration and plans to repeal a law that protects wetlands. Compare Houston to Amsterdam and Rotterdam, which sit below sea level. Regulation and planning have helped the Dutch cities lower flood risk and save money.

As climate disruption accelerates in concert with still-increasing greenhouse gas emissions, people are looking for ways to protect cities from events like flooding. In China, authorities are aiming to make them more sponge-like. A Guardian article explained: “Designers will concede to the wisdom of nature to ensure water is absorbed when there’s an excess: instead of water-resistant concrete, permeable materials and green spaces will be used to soak up rainfall, and rivers and streams will be interconnected so that water can flow away from flooded areas.” As well as offering flood protection, the measures will also help prevent water shortages.

Cities worldwide have employed many of these flood-protection measures, including in the U.S. If China goes beyond its 16-city pilot project, it will be the largest-scale deployment of such combined measures ever.

Restoring natural areas costs much more than protecting them in the first place, more intense and frequent storms and floods can still overwhelm natural defenses, and growing human populations will further stress resources, but restoring natural assets is a start.

Ultimately, we must work with nature to prevent and adapt to problems such as flooding, water scarcity, wildfires and climate disruption. When we work against nature, we work against ourselves.

David Suzuki is a well-known Canadian scientist, broadcaster and environmental activist.

Read More

President Donald Trump offered more tough talk after North Korea performed its most recent missile launch over Japan, warning on Tuesday that “all options are on the table.” But while Trump’s approach to North Korea has involved both veiled and explicit threats of military action, polling shows that most Americans would prefer the president consider one option that he’s left off the table in his rhetoric on the matter—that of high-level diplomatic discussions with Kim Jong-un’s regime.

While behind-the-scenes talks have taken place between diplomatic officials from both countries, Trump has indicated that he sees military threats and action as the best way to approach the isolated regime.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday morning, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said “enough is enough” from North Korea and warned that “something serious has to happen” in response to Monday’s missile launch.

The missile North Korea fired into the Pacific Ocean on Monday was reportedly the same ballistic missile that it could potentially launch toward Guam, as it threatened to do earlier this month. Kim Jong-un threatened to attack Guam after Trump said the U.S. would respond with “fire and fury” if North Korea continued testing nuclear weapons. After the Guam threat, the president said of North Korea, “things will happen to them like they never thought possible” should they attack the U.S. territory.

The missile launch came a week after Trump boasted to a crowd in Phoenix, Arizona that Kim was “starting to respect” the U.S. following the president’s threats. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also remarked that week that Pyongyang had “certainly demonstrated some level of restraint” in recent days.

But after the quiet proved to be short-lived, Trump’s newest threats continued the cycle that’s been established in recent weeks between North Korea and the U.S.: violence met with threats of more violence. Meanwhile, South Korea dropped eight powerful bombs at a firing range near its border with North Korea, in order to “display a strong capability to punish” Pyongyang if war touches off.

As the international anti-nuclear group Global Zero pointed out on Monday, a majority of Americans oppose Trump’s threats when it comes to North Korea and instead support diplomatic and non-military solutions to diminish tensions.

A Harvard-Harris poll conducted last week found that Trump’s threats haven’t been met favorably by most Americans. Fifty-three percent don’t approve of how he has handled escalating tensions with North Korea, and 56 percent found his “fire and fury” comment, made spontaneously at a press conference on the opioid epidemic in the U.S., was “over the top and unhelpful,” according to The Hill‘s report on the survey.

The United Nations Security Council is holding talks on Tuesday to discuss North Korea’s latest action.

Click Here: Aston Villa Shop

As Hurricane Irma continues on its “frightening” course towards the Keys and mainland Florida, a series of aerial videos taken from the Virgin Islands in the Caribbean are offering some of the first detailed looks at what the storm’s wrath is capable of and the scale of the damage suffered from those exposed to her historic size and strength.

Providing by a tourism outfit called Caribbean Buzz Helicopters, based in the Virgin Islands, and posted to their Facebook page on Friday, the videos—as well as these photographs—offered some of the first overhead surveys of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), the islands of Eustatia and Tortala in the British Virginia Islands (BVI), including closeup looks at specific coastal communities and smaller islands hit by the storm throughout archipelago.

Bitter End, Virgin Gorda, BVI:

St. Thomas, USVI:

Tortola, BVI:

Eustatia, BVI:

Saba Rock, BVI:

Beef Island, BVI:

Cow Wreck, Anegada, BVI:

Mafolie, St. Thomas, USVI:

Princess Diana was a vivacious child—even if her childhood was not always an easy one.

“After my mother left, it was really the two of us growing up alone,” Diana’s brother Charles, 9th Earl Spencer, says in an exclusive sneak peek of The Story of Diana, an upcoming two-part television event from People and ABC.

Princess Diana Archive/Getty

Click Here: Spain Football Shop

Exclusive home movie footage shows young Diana at play, goofing with her little brother and captivating the camera from an early age. The documentary traces her journey from her years growing up a child of divorce at the Spencer family’s ancestral home, Althorp, through her marriage to Prince Charles and her unparalleled rise as a global celebrity adored by billions of fans around the world.

“She wanted someone to just love her,” says Vivienne Parry, Diana’s friend from Birthright, a mother and baby charity.

The Story of Diana features new interviews with family, friends, and colleagues from the charity world who share personal stories of their time with the People’s Princess. Diana appeared on the cover of People a record-breaking 57 times. Aug. 31 will mark the 20th anniversary of her death in a Paris car crash.

RELATED: Shop Princess Diana and Kate Middleton’s Twinning Style Moments

“One of the reasons I wanted to talk now is because I think after 20 years, somebody shifts from being a contemporary person to one of history, actually,” says Charles Spencer. “And Diana deserves a place in history. This was a special person, and not just a beautiful one.”

The Story of Diana: Part One airs Aug. 9 at 9 p.m. ET and The Story of Diana: Part Two airs Aug. 10 at 9 p.m. ET on ABC.

Tens of thousands of students from more than 60 communities across the United Kingdom skipped class on Friday to join the global youth-led #schoolstrike4climate, calling on world leaders to take bolder steps to eradicate fossil fuels and combat the climate crisis.

“It’s sort of scary to think about that when I’m older there might not be a North Pole or maybe no rainforest or anything.”
—11-year-old striker

Speaking to Sky News in London’s Parliament Square on Friday, 12-year-old Theo said he is striking “because there are people in that building over there, going in week in and week out, and completely declining the fact that our world is dying out.”

Theo added that he thinks U.K. legislators, who are failing to take necessary steps to address the crisis, “are completely obsessed…with money” and “are completely disregarding…the world.”

Pointing to rising temperatures and visible changes in the global climate, Theo’s 11-year-old friend said he joined the strike because “it’s sort of scary to think about that when I’m older there might not be a North Pole or maybe no rainforest or anything.”

The striking students carried signs that warned “our generation will suffer,” and asked, “the climate is changing, why aren’t we?” Chants across the country ranged from “whose streets, our streets,” and “we want change,” to “fuck Theresa May”—the Tory prime minister who criticized the demonstrations via a spokesperson.

Some students spontaneously blocked Downing Street—which houses the prime minister’s residence and office—and police even began arresting some strikers, according to posts on social media by the environmental group Extinction Rebellion and other observers:

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

Endorsed by the National Association of Head Teachers as well as Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn, the U.K. climate strike follows several recent mass mobilizations of young people across the globe.

“I’ve always had a strong fascination with the environment, and I’ve always been aware of climate change and sustainable living, but when I saw thousands of kids around the world striking for the cause it inspired me to start my own,” 17-year-old Anna Taylor, a co-founder of the U.K. Student Climate Network, the group coordinating the country’s strike, told the New York Times.

“Youth voices are too often left out of the discussion when it comes to climate change.”
—Jake Woodier, U.K. Youth Climate Coalition

“While we’re failing to deliver the changes young people need, we can hardly blame them for taking action themselves. Education has today been flipped on its head. The young are teaching the old, and we should pay attention,” Greenpeace U.K. executive director John Sauven said in a statement to the Guardian.

“Young people know that their lives are going to be changed dramatically by the impacts of climate change. The risks that older people hope they might dodge are the problems the young will inherit,” Sauven added. “And the longer the young wait for action to be taken, the harder it will be for them in future.”

Jake Woodier, a member of the U.K. Youth Climate Coalition, noted that “youth voices are too often left out of the discussion when it comes to climate change.” As he told the Times, “Our current trajectory is completely incompatible with a clean, safe environment not only for ourselves, but future generations as well.”

That sentiment was echoed by Greta Thunberg—a 16-year-old from Sweden whose protests outside her country’s parliament last year inspired the global movement—who discussed the U.K. demonstrations on “Good Morning Britain” Friday:

As Thunberg put it, “Why should we be studying for a future that soon might not exist anymore?”

Read More

Erdem and H&M Are Collaborating on a New Line

November 13, 2019 | News | No Comments

H&M’s fashion collaborations have brought designer brands like Kenzo and Alexander Wang to thousands of people, and this fall, we can expect the same kind of fashion magic yet again.

The London-based fashion label Erdem is the latest brand that H&M has tapped for a collection, and we couldn’t be more excited. Erdem is most known for its dynamic and colorful prints, which means we can expect some show stopping pieces.

Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/WireImage

To announce the collab, H&M released a special short film shot by Baz Luhrmann. It is—in a word—artsy.

The film shows a number of well-dressed people running through an elaborate garden, but we never see their faces. The only view we have is of their backs as they dash through trees and around flowers.

While we don’t yet have official shots of the Erdem x H&M clothes close-up, if the video is any indication, the clothes will be worth the wait.

VIDEO: David Beckham’s H&M Video

“From the moment we started talking with Erdem about the collaboration, I was captured by his vision. For Erdem x H&M he has created an enchanting world full of beauty, delicacy and rich details. These are special pieces you will want to wear forever,” Ann-Sofie Johansson, H&M’s creative advisor, said in a press release.

The line will include both men’s and women’s clothes, which makes the collaboration extra special because it will be designer Erdem Moralıoglu first men’s collection.

RELATED: See Every Piece from H&M’s Collaboration with Parisian Concept Store Colette

You can find the Erdem x H&M collection on shelves and online at H&M starting Nov. 2.

Click Here: mochila fjallraven

Since Kate Hudson shaved off her famously long blonde hair for her upcoming movie Sister with Sia and Maddie Ziegler, we can’t seem to get enough of her new buzz cut.

The actress sported her new ‘do once again on Monday while walking around the movie set in California, and even though we couldn’t see much of it under her navy baseball hat, we still dig her style.

Cousart/JFXimages/WENN.com

While we may not have gotten a glimpse of her hair, her abs were on full display. Hudson wore a gray Calvin Klein sports bra (which you can purchase here) with matching pants and a white sweatshirt tied around her waist.

VIDEO: Kate Hudson Looks Back at Her Favorite InStyle Covers

Wearing hair-hiding hats with sports bras seems to be a new fashion trend for Hudson—she wore a similar ensemble just last week and looked equally fierce.

RELATED: Here’s the Wig Kate Hudson Is Wearing After Shaving Her Head a Week Ago

With Hudson’s new shaved cut bringing out this stylish athleisure side to her, we’re excited to see what street style look she wears next.

Click Here: Japan Rugby Shop

Princess Diana was a 19-year-old in a simple sweater and skirt when she first walked into the London studio of the up-and-coming designers she would ultimately choose to make her landmark wedding dress.

Designer Elizabeth Emanuel recalls that the young bride-to-be morphed as the weeks elapsed before her 1981 wedding to Prince Charles, losing a notable amount of the “puppy fat” she had when she first walked in.

“Most brides do lose weight,” Emanuel tells People. “So we weren’t that worried when she did. She was looking fantastic. She ended up with a 23-inch waist from a 26- to 27- inch.

“She just walked more confidently. She just was suddenly growing up, you know? But I think she felt very good about how she looked.”

Terry Fincher/Princess Diana Archive/Getty

When the then-Lady Diana Spencer first rang up the studio, Emanuel mistakenly got her name wrong. So it was a total surprise when the new fiancée of the future king strode in for their initial meeting. “There was instant recognition when she walked through the door,” she recalls.

Emanuel and her husband and designing partner at the time, David, created the voluminous gown in total secrecy. “She was just lovely, really kind of easy going,” she recalls of the low-key Diana. “We never had any special instructions about how to make the wedding dress. That added a bit to the fun of it all, made it bit of an adventure.”

Tim Graham/Getty

Emanuel, who now runs her own fashion line, is among the friends and family (including Diana’s brother Charles, 9th Earl Spencer) and confidantes remembering the late princess in a two-night television event from People and ABC, The Story of Diana, airing on ABC on Aug. 9 and 10 at 9 p.m. E.T.

The designing couple (who later split) decided to make Diana’s iconic bridal train as long as possible because “St. Paul’s Cathedral is a really big area to fill,” notes Emanuel.

VIDEO: Prince William and Prince Harry Share Private Family Snapshots from Their Childhood

The final fitting was in Buckingham Palace so they could test out the train in all its glory in a spectacular corridor. “This was a real royal palace. Here was Diana in our wedding dress which we designed for her,” says Emanuel.

Anwar Hussein/WireImage

On the big day, Diana wore jeans and watched TV while having her tiara added to her newly done hair in Clarence House, bridesmaid India Hicks recalls.

“She was incredibly together and wasn’t panicking,” says Emanuel. “But I was really worried about all things that could possibly go wrong. We’d taken smelling salts, glucose tablets—what if she feels faint? What if she passes out? Spills something down her skirt?”

“I had this kind of horror that maybe the train would drop off. We sewed her into things, we pinned her into things.”

When the big moment came on July 29, 1981, the dress cascaded out of the royal carriage, as Diana took her place alongside her proud father John, 8th Earl Spencer.

RELATED: Kate Middleton and Princess Diana’s Twinning Style

“It’s always been about a butterfly emerging from a chrysalis,” recalls Emanuel. “And that is her story, really. She was emerging into a new world, a new life’s adventure.”

Hillary Clinton is finally opening up about the 2016 presidential election. In her new memoir, appropriately titled What Happened, the Democratic presidential candidate tells the story of that tense and controversial election from her own point of view.

“In the past, for reasons I try to explain, I’ve often felt I had to be careful in public like I was up on a wire without a net. Now I’m letting my guard down,” she writes in the introduction of the new memoir.

Courtesy

“Now free from the constraints of running, Hillary takes you inside the intense personal experience of becoming the first woman nominated for president by a major party in an election marked by rage, sexism, exhilarating highs and infuriating lows, stranger-than-fiction twists, Russian interference, and an opponent who broke all the rules,” Simon and Schuster writes.

VIDEO: Celebs Who Have Snagged Selfies with Hillary Clinton

In the upcoming book, Clinton addresses the mistakes she made throughout the process, but also how she’s picked herself up after defeat. According to the publisher, Clinton shows “humor and candor” in the intensely personal new memoir.

RELATED: Hillary Clinton Models a “Nasty Woman” T-Shirt that Supports Planned Parenthood

What Happened hits shelves Sept. 12, 2017.