Month: September 2020

Home / Month: September 2020

Civil liberties advocates around the country celebrated after Somerville, Massachusetts on Thursday became the second city in the United States to bar local government—including law enforcement—from using facial recognition technology.

“Facial recognition can be used to track our every movement, supercharge racial profiling and discrimination, target political dissidents, and control nearly every aspect of our lives.”
—Evan Greer, Fight for the Future

By approving the ordinance, Somerville is “joining a growing nationwide movement to bring the technology under democratic control,” Kade Crockford, director of the ACLU of Massachusetts Technology for Liberty Program, said in a statement to the news website Wicked Local North of Boston.

“The city is sending a bold statement that it won’t sit by idly while the dystopian technology further outpaces our civil liberties protections and harms privacy, racial and gender justice, and freedom of speech,” Crockford added.

Wicked Local reported that the ACLU of Massachusetts—which launched a “Press Pause on Face Surveillance” campaign earlier this month to highlight mounting concerns about how the technology can be used and abused—worked on the ordinance with Ben Ewen-Campen, the Somerville City Council member who introduced it.

After the ordinance passed unanimously, Ewen-Campen told Wicked Local that the policy “is a small step but it’s a reminder that we are in charge of our own society… and that the community activists, the government working together, can actually shape this stuff, we don’t have to just sit back and take it.”

Somerville’s Democratic mayor, Joseph Curtatone, signed the ordinance on Friday. In a statement to The Hill, he said, “I have serious concerns about the use of facial recognition technology, and I commend the city council for taking this important action to ban the acquisition or use of such technologies in our community.”

Summarizing the mayor’s statement, The Hill reported:

Click Here: Cardiff Blues Store

After the Somerville City Council Legislative Matters Committee on Tuesday advanced the facial recognition ban to a final vote, Evan Greer of the national digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future said that “some technology is simply too dangerous to exist.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“Facial recognition can be used to track our every movement, supercharge racial profiling and discrimination, target political dissidents, and control nearly every aspect of our lives,” Greer warned. “Lawmakers are beginning to agree that this dystopian technology is dangerous.”

Somerville’s move to outlaw facial surveillance technology comes after the San Francisco Board of Supervisors enacted a similar ordinance—the nation’s first—last month. Other California cities could soon approve their own local restrictions, as Fight for the Future detailed in a statement Friday:

Fight for the Future noted that the Somerville vote also came alongside another blow to facial recognition technology.

NPR reported Thursday that Axon, the largest manufacturer of police body cameras, announced “it is heeding the recommendation of an independent ethics board which it created last year after acquiring two artificial intelligence companies” and “rejecting the possibility of selling facial recognition technology—at least, for now.”

Jake Laperruque, senior counsel for the watchdog group the Project On Government Oversight, told NPR that the company’s decision is an indication of the technology’s serious issues with misidentification.

“But we can’t expect the company to stick to this pledge or other vendors to follow suit,” Laperruque added. “The only way to truly protect the public from unrestricted facial recognition surveillance is to pass laws properly limiting it.

Greer, in a statement Friday, spoke out against companies that continue to develop the technology—which is increasingly being used by airlines, governments, law enforcement, retailers, and schools in the United States and across the globe.

“Tech companies that have developed facial recognition are telling us that it’s the wave of the future, promising convenience and public safety. This is because they stand to profit from it,” she said. “In reality, facial recognition is a menacing technology that will lead to a total surveillance regime, driven by suspicion and devoid of empathy. How many people could be imprisoned, deported, or killed because software casually misread their features and facial expressions, because a computer decided their fate? Facial recognition tech must be stopped.”

Although there currently are no federal rules on facial recognition technology, the Democrat-controlled House Oversight Committee has held two hearings on the subject this year. After the first hearing in May, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) connected “the political reality that there is a global rise in authoritarianism and fascism” to concerns over how the technology threatens Americans’ civil liberties.

At the second hearing earlier this month, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) captured a sentiment widely shared by privacy advocates and the public when she said: “This stuff freaks me out. I’m a little freaked out by facial recognition.” In a tweet that same day, the congresswoman added: “You should be freaked out too. The inaccuracy and threat to our privacy is real.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Hours after Gov. Ricardo Rosselló resisted calls to step down over messages mocking victims of Hurricane Maria and attacking fellow politicians with misogynistic slurs, an estimated 400,000 Puerto Ricans took to the streets Monday and demanded Rosselló’s resignation in what was described as one of the largest protests in the island’s history.

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

“The people have spoken,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), whose mother was born in Puerto Rico, tweeted in response to video footage of Puerto Ricans flooding miles of the Las Américas highway.

The highway march was part of an island-wide general strike aimed at forcing Rosselló’s ouster. As the New York Times reported, classes on the island were canceled, the largest mall in San Juan was closed, and banks did not open amid the massive demonstrations against Rosselló.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

In an address on Sunday, Rosselló announced he is stepping down as head of his party and said he will not run for reelection in 2020, but stopped short of resigning.

“Governor Ricardo Rosselló has made further mockery of the Puerto Rican people by refusing to leave office,” the progressive coalition Power 4 Puerto Rico said in a statement Monday. “As worldwide demonstrations calling for the governor to step down continue, the legislature of Puerto Rico must now commence an impeachment process based on the ample evidence corroborated by many jurists of Rosselló breaking the law.”

Laura Rexach Olivencia, a Puerto Rico radio host, called Rosselló’s refusal to listen to the public and step down “a slap in the face to all Puerto Ricans.”

“For him to think he can keep governing for another year and a half as if nothing has happened is insulting to our core,” said Olivencia.

Author and environmentalist Naomi Klein—who has written extensively on how Wall Street vultures have exploited Puerto Rico’s debt crisis for profit as residents suffer brutal austerity—called the demonstrations “absolutely extraordinary” and said they are about problems that run much deeper than Rosselló.

“Sending love and solidarity to Puerto Rican revolutionaries who are showing the world how it’s done,” Klein tweeted. “This is about #RickyRenuncia but also the anti-democratic Junta, the odious debt, and the right to sovereignty on every front!”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Five takeaways from Mississippi's Senate debate

September 12, 2020 | News | No Comments

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R) and her Democratic challenger, Mike Espy, faced off in their only debate ahead of the Mississippi runoff election on Nov. 27, clashing on issues from the Republican’s controversial “public hanging” comments to health care and immigration.

Both candidates sought to draw sharp contrasts throughout the debate: Hyde-Smith repeatedly promoted her conservative credentials and tied herself closely to President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE, while Espy promised he would remain independent if elected to represent the deep-red state.

Here are the five takeaways from Tuesday’s debate, in what is the last remaining Senate contest of 2018.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hyde-Smith apologizes for ‘public hanging’ comment

Hyde-Smith’s recent comments that she would be “on the front row” if a supporter invited her to a “public hanging” garnered most of the headlines in the days leading to the debate. But they ended up occupying only a small, albeit memorable, portion of the debate.

The Republican senator sought to defend her comments, saying they were made to express support for a supporter who had lost his parents to cancer.

She denied that the comments were made to “imply I would enjoy any type of capital punishment” and emphasized “there was no ill will whatsoever in my statement.”

“For anyone who was offended by my comment, I certainly apologize,” she said.

She then sought to attack Espy, saying her comments were “twisted” and “used for nothing but political gain.”

Espy went on the attack, saying that “nobody twisted your comments because they came out from your mouth.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In one of the most memorable lines, the Democrat noted that the comments had “caused our state harm.”

“It’s given our state another black eye that we don’t need,” he added, while noting it had brought up “stereotypes we don’t need anymore.”

Neither candidate, nor any of the moderators, brought up the controversy again until the closing moment when Espy took another dig at Hyde-Smith for having hurt the state.  

Health care and pre-existing conditions take center stage

A significant portion of the debate focused on health care and pre-existing conditions, a common theme this campaign cycle.

Like other Senate races where Republicans have been on the defensive, Hyde-Smith repeatedly said she supported protections for people with pre-existing conditions.

“I strongly believe in the pre-existing conditions,” she said, though she also called for a repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

She noted she had co-sponsored a bill introduced by Sen. Thom TillisThomas (Thom) Roland TillisKoch-backed group launches ad campaign to support four vulnerable GOP senators The Hill’s Campaign Report: It’s primary night in Georgia Tillis unveils new 0,000 ad in North Carolina Senate race MORE (R-N.C.), called the Ensuring Coverage for Patients with Pre-Existing Conditions Act, that she says would protect patients with pre-existing conditions.

But like other Democratic Senate candidates, Espy accused Hyde-Smith of being deceitful in touting her support for people with pre-existing conditions, saying that she voted against legislation in the Senate that would have prevented insurers from selling what Espy described as “junk insurance” plans to patients.

Ivory Coast dictator sparks heated exchange

Hyde-Smith sought to make Espy’s controversial 2011 lobbying contract in the Ivory Coast a frequent attack line throughout the debate following a Fox News report that the Democrat took a $750,000 contract with the West African country’s government.

Ivory Coast was led at the time by Laurent Gbagbo, who is now on trial for crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court. 

Hyde-Smith called Gbagbo a man who was on trial for crimes including murder, rape and doing “unspeakable things to small children.”

“To think that he has been hired by a foreign dictator to the tune of $750,000,” Hyde-Smith said, referring to Espy.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Espy said he forfeited a contract extension after he realized “how bad the guy was,” referring to Gbagbo, and that he passed his knowledge on to intelligence services.

According to the Fox News report last week, Espy took a contract with the Ivory Coast’s government-controlled Cocoa and Coffee Board in 2011. Its products were subject to multiple embargoes resulting from state-sponsored violence in the country. 

Espy initially said in February 2011 that he ended his work early and only accepted $400,000, but Fox News reported that documents Espy later filed showed an additional $350,000 payment in March of that year.

Hyde-Smith highlights her pro-Trump views

Besides defending her support for protections for people with pre-existing conditions, Hyde-Smith had another clear strategy in the debate: tie herself to Trump.

In both her opening and closing statements, the interim senator plugged the president’s upcoming campaign rallies in Mississippi on Monday, which will be held on the eve of the runoff in an effort to bolster her candidacy. 

Trump was seen as a factor in some Senate races across the country, allowing Republicans to extend their majority to 52-47 from 51-49 before the midterms.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hyde-Smith also stressed a number of her conservative stances on issues that align with the president.

When the candidates were asked about immigration, Hyde-Smith called for a wall to be built along the southern border — a proposal that was a key message for Trump in 2016.

“I think we should definitely build that wall. I think we have to build that wall. We can’t have people storming our borders,” she said. 

She also reiterated during the debate that she supports lower taxes and fewer regulations and that she is anti-abortion. As she touted those views, she called on voters to hit the polls next week to defend Mississippi’s “conservative values.”

Espy promises independence in ‘Mississippi First’ strategy

If Hyde-Smith’s strategy was to promote her support for Trump, Espy’s was equally clear: to tout his independence and parry the Republican’s attacks that he was “too liberal” for the state.

In his opening statement, Espy promised that he would put “Mississippi first.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“That means Mississippi over party. Mississippi over person,” he said. “I don’t care how powerful that person might be. It means Mississippi each and every time.”

He added that he wouldn’t let “anybody in the federal government run over you.”

Espy also took moderate positions throughout the debate, including promising to defend the Second Amendment and touting his ownership of guns, though also calling for more vetting on gun sales.

At another point, he called for a “strong immigration policy” while also saying those seeking asylum should be allowed to enter the country.

And in his closing statement, Espy criticized the current state of Congress and said he would “lift us above all the noise” and reach across the aisle to bring people of Mississippi together.

“I really believe I can do that. I’ve done it all my life,” he said. 

He even praised former Sen. Thad CochranWilliam (Thad) Thad CochranEspy wins Mississippi Senate Democratic primary Bottom Line Mike Espy announces Mississippi Senate bid MORE (R), who retired earlier this year because of poor health and whose seat Hyde-Smith was appointed to fill.

Click Here: camisetas de futbol baratas

Espy, in his closing statements, said he wished Cochran well, calling him a “thoughtful” and “efficient” senator.

“I would hope to be the kind of senator that Sen. Cochran is,” he said.

Updated on Nov. 21 at 6:51 a.m.

The Boston Globe’s editorial board on Thursday panned a potential presidential run by Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names MORE (D-Mass.), saying she would be a divisive figure when Democrats need to present a united front against President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE.

“While Warren is an effective and impactful senator with an important voice nationally, she has become a divisive figure,” the editorial board wrote. “A unifying voice is what the country needs now after the polarizing politics of Donald Trump.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A Warren candidacy, while likely to energize certain elements of the party’s progressive wing, runs the risk of being mired in controversy over her claims to Native American ancestry. In October, she released the results of a DNA test that ended up drawing criticism from both sides of the aisle.

Warren’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill.

The editorial board argued that the Democratic field for 2020 is likely to be crowded with diverse candidates and may include high-profile candidates such as former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE, Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper (D), former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D), and Sens. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.), Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook McEnany says Juneteenth is a very ‘meaningful’ day to Trump MORE (D-Calif.) and Cory BookerCory Anthony BookerRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants Black lawmakers unveil bill to remove Confederate statues from Capitol Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk MORE (D-N.J.).

But the editorial board said Warren’s time has passed.

“In 2015, this editorial page urged Warren to run, in part because of the lack of serious competition against Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE. (Clearing the decks for Clinton didn’t exactly end well for Democrats, did it?),” the editorial board wrote. “Warren missed her moment in 2016, and there’s reason to be skeptical of her prospective candidacy in 2020.”

While Warren coasted to reelection in November, she won with fewer votes and by a smaller margin than the reelection of Gov. Charlie Baker, the state’s Republican governor in an otherwise Democratic stronghold.

“Those are warning signs from the voters who know her best,” the editorial board wrote.

Warren has fueled speculation about a potential presidential campaign, telling voters at a town hall in September that she would think about running after the midterms.

However, the Globe cited Deval Patrick, the former Massachusetts governor who announced Thursday he would not run for president, as an example it says Warren should follow to scrap a possible run. 

“Politicians who ‘explore’ or ‘consider’ presidential campaigns set in motion a machine that can be hard to stop. Patrick did, and that’s to his credit. There’s no shame in testing the waters and deciding to stay on the beach,” the editorial board wrote.

Click Here: Golf special

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is prepared to spend upwards of $100 million should he mount a 2020 bid for the White House, according to CNBC. 

Howard Wolfson, the billionaire business magnate’s top political advisor, told the news outlet that Bloomberg spent more than $100 million in his last campaign for New York City mayor in 2009. 

“Last time I looked, NYC is a fraction of the size of the country as a whole,” Wolfson said in an email to the outlet.

ADVERTISEMENT

 Wolfson added that Bloomberg would spend “whatever is required” on his own campaign if he decides to make a run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. 

A spokesperson for Bloomberg did not immediately respond to The Hill’s request for comment.

If Bloomberg does throw his name into the running, he would begin his campaign with a significant cash advantage over other potential Democratic frontrunners, like former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE or Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.). 

The former New York City mayor has already developed a reputation as a major donor in Democratic circles. He spent more than $110 million to boost Democratic candidates in the 2018 midterm elections. 

Despite Bloomberg’s vast financial resources, he’s likely to have to overcome a crowded Democratic primary field that could include high-profile political figures, like Biden and Rep. Beto O’RourkeBeto O’RourkeBiden will help close out Texas Democrats’ virtual convention: report O’Rourke on Texas reopening: ‘Dangerous, dumb and weak’ Parties gear up for battle over Texas state House MORE (D-Texas), whose unsuccessful Senate bid against Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump’s public standing sags after Floyd protests GOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police MORE (R-Texas) this year elevated him to rockstar status in the party.

At the same time, early polls show Biden, Sanders and O’Rourke among the frontrunners in the Democratic primary field. A CNN poll conducted earlier this month showed Bloomberg tied for seventh place alongside Sens. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names MORE (D-Mass.) and Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Democrats demand Republican leaders examine election challenges after Georgia voting chaos Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk MORE (D-Minn.).

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey

Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownHillicon Valley: Senators raise concerns over government surveillance of protests | Amazon pauses police use of its facial recognition tech | FBI warns hackers are targeting mobile banking apps Democratic senators raise concerns over government surveillance of protests Some realistic solutions for income inequality MORE (D-Ohio) announced Tuesday night that he’s launching a “Dignity of Work” tour in four early nominating states as he continues to explore a 2020 presidential campaign.

Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Head rompers

Brown has been seriously considering a White House bid to take on President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE since the November midterm elections. His tour will kick off on Jan. 30 in Cleveland, with a stop in Iowa the following day. He has yet to announce the dates of his other stops in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.

In a Tuesday interview on MSNBC, Brown said that he and his wife, journalist Connie Schultz, haven’t decided on a 2020 campaign and will make that decision “in the weeks ahead.”

“The message of dignity of work will work for any Democratic nominee that comes down the line in the next several months,” Brown said during a Tuesday appearance on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Ohio senator’s tour launch comes just hours after Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Warren, Pressley introduce bill to make it a crime for police officers to deny medical care to people in custody Senate Dems press DOJ over coronavirus safety precautions in juvenile detention centers MORE (D-N.Y.) said that she’s forming an exploratory committee in a clip released from her Tuesday night appearance on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.”

Brown, who has progressive bona fides, has served in the Senate since 2006 and easily cruised to reelection in the 2018 midterms. Brown’s victory was a silver lining for Democrats given that Republicans held onto the governor’s mansion and didn’t flip several targeted House races.

Ohio, a perennial presidential battleground, will play a key role in the 2020 race, especially after Trump won the Buckeye State by 8 points in 2016. Some Democrats see Brown as a candidate who could win over both progressives and Trump voters, especially since the two overlap on issues like trade.

As Brown continues to mull a run, more Democrats are jumping into the race, which has quickly accelerated in recent days.

Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names MORE (D-Mass.) launched an exploratory committee on New Year’s Eve and has been making multiple stops in the early nominating states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

Other recent presidential announcements include Rep. Tulsi GabbardTulsi GabbardGabbard drops defamation lawsuit against Clinton It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process 125 lawmakers urge Trump administration to support National Guard troops amid pandemic MORE (D-Hawaii) and Julián Castro, a former Housing and Urban Development secretary in the Obama administration.

But there are a host of other likely White House hopefuls waiting in the wings, including former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE and Sens. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.) and Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook McEnany says Juneteenth is a very ‘meaningful’ day to Trump MORE (D-Calif.).

Republicans have been anticipating a run by Brown and conservative group America Rising has already started conducting opposition research on his wife, according to BuzzFeed News.

Max Greenwood contributed.

A coalition of environmental, farmworker, public health, and food safety advocacy groups on Thursday delivered to Congress a petition signed by more than 100,000 people which calls for a Green New Deal “that fixes our food system” to combat the climate crisis.

The petition echoes a letter that more than 300 organizations sent to federal lawmakers in April on behalf of their millions of members. The letter came about two months after Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) introduced the historic Green New Deal resolution supported by a growing grassroots movement and dozens of Democrats in Congress.

“Supporting family farms, achieving universal access to healthy foods, and investing in sustainable farming and land-use practices that increase soil health are critical components of any comprehensive Green New Deal,” declares the new petition, which notes that in addition to being a top generator of jobs, the U.S. food and farming sector is also a top generator of planet-heating emissions.

Click Here: gws giants guernsey 2019

“To reduce emissions and bolster our nation’s resilience in the face of the climate crisis, we must enact policies that transform unsustainable industrial agriculture, reduce food sector consolidation, as well as empower farmers and ranchers to adopt organic and agroecological practices,” the petition says. “These policies must support diversified and ecologically regenerative farming techniques that reduce greenhouse gases and other pollution, boost soil health, and sequester carbon in soil—enhancing local and regional food security, economic well-being, and biodiversity.”

The petition outlines specific food and farming policies that signatories believe should be prioritized in the Green New Deal:

  • Carbon reduction, sequestration, and climate resilience;
  • Fair prices for farmers, ranchers, and fishers; antitrust measures that help reverse food sector consolidation; and healthy working conditions with family-sustaining living wages for workers;
  • Diversified, resilient local, and regional food economies anchored by family farmers; ranchers and fishers that ensure healthy, sustainable food for all to combat consolidation in the food and farming sector; and reverse the rapid loss of farmers and deterioration of farmland;
  • Avoid “false solutions” and agribusiness-sponsored proposals that do nothing to address the systemic causes of our climate crisis and delay progress;
  • Protection for workers, rural communities, consumer health and soil productivity through the transition away from harmful agrochemical use in agricultural practices and production;
  • Ensure that those most affected by the exploitation of people and the environment of the current agricultural system and who have experience and knowledge to contribute have a seat at the table in decisions and negotiations.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The petition is a collaborative project between the Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth, the HEAL Food Alliance, the Farmworker Association of Florida, PANNA, 198 Methods, the Daily Kos, and the Organic Consumers Association, which tweeted about the key demands with the hashtag #GreenNewFoodDeal.

“If we are to address the climate crisis, we must transform our food system,” Lisa Archer, food and agriculture director for Friends of the Earth, said in a statement Thursday. “We have no time to waste.”

Jeannie Economos, Pesticide Safety and Environmental Health Project coordinator of the Farmworker Association of Florida, pointed out that “agriculture—and the farmworker families on which it depends—are some of the first victims of a changing global climate.”

“We need a Green New Deal that centers family farmers, farm workers, and food workers,” said Navina Khanna, director of the HEAL Food Alliance. “Making fundamental changes to our food and farming system is urgent and central to stabilizing our climate, and ensuring food security for current and future generations, and making sure that all people working in the system do so with meaning and dignity.”

The alliance shared a link to the petition—which is still available online for additional signatures—in a tweet Thursday:

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

NXT UK Women’s Champion Kay Lee Ray is set to make her first title defense since January.

KLR will defend her NXT UK Women’s Championship against Piper Niven on the Thursday, September 24 episode of NXT UK. The announcement of the match was made on today’s NXT UK episode that previewed the brand’s return to in-ring action.

That return to in-ring action will take place on NXT UK next Thursday (September 17). KLR will speak on the episode ahead of her title defense against Niven, more details for the NXT UK Heritage Cup will be revealed, and NXT UK Tag Team Champions Gallus (Mark Coffey & Wolfgang) will face Amir Jordan & Kenny Williams in a non-title match.

Click Here: essendon bombers guernsey 2019

In her most recent title defense, KLR retained the NXT Women’s Championship against Toni Storm in an I Quit match that was filmed in January and aired in February. As a stipulation of that match, Storm can’t challenge for the NXT UK Women’s title again for as long as KLR is champion.

The tapings for NXT UK’s return are being done at BT Sport studios in London, England with no fans in attendance. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, these are NXT UK’s first events since March.

Read More

Click:check balance my gift card

Asking the American public to judge his 2020 Democratic presidential campaign by both its supporters and its powerful enemies, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday unveiled an “anti-endorsement” list consisting of prominent billionaires, Wall Street bankers, and corporate CEOs who have attacked his candidacy and policies.

“These people have a vested interest in preserving the status quo so they can keep their grip on power so they can continue to exploit working people across America.”
—Sen. Bernie Sanders

“You can tell who is truly fighting for working families by the enemies they make, and we’ve made a lot of enemies,” Sanders said in a statement. “We understand that nothing will fundamentally change for working Americans unless we have the guts to take on the most powerful corporate interests in this country.”

“Therefore it should come as no surprise that corporate CEOs and billionaires have united against our movement,” Sanders added. “These people have a vested interest in preserving the status quo so they can keep their grip on power so they can continue to exploit working people across America. We welcome their hatred.”

The Sanders campaign lists the Vermont senator’s anti-endorsements on a new webpage. The page includes billionaire Democratic mega-donor Haim Saban, who attacked Sanders as a “disaster zone” in an interview published Wednesday.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The rest of the list consists of:

“As we fight for an agenda that guarantees basic human rights for all Americans, we will be opposed by the most powerful forces in America,” Sanders wrote on his website. “I am proud to announce the modern-day oligarchs who oppose our movement. In the words of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt: ‘They are unanimous in their hate for me–and I welcome their hatred.'”

“We will overcome their greed,” said Sanders, “and create an economy and a government that works for all, not just the one percent.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: COLLINGWOOD MAGPIES 2019

Read More

Exiled American whistleblower Edward Snowden, who rattled the U.S. intelligence establishment and ignited a worldwide debate about surveillance by leaking classified documents in 2013, announced Thursday that his memoir, Permanent Record, is set to be published globally on Sept. 17.

“In Permanent Record, he tells his story for the very first time, bringing the reader along as he helps to create this system of mass surveillance, and then experiences the crisis of conscience that led him to try to bring it down,” according to the publisher, Metropolitan Books, an imprint of Henry Holt and Company, which operates under Macmillan Publishers.

Macmillan Publishers chief executive John Sargent said in a statement Thursday that “Edward Snowden decided at the age of 29 to give up his entire future for the good of his country.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“He displayed enormous courage in doing so, and like him or not, his is an incredible American story. There is no doubt that the world is a better and more private place for his actions,” Sargent added. “Macmillan is enormously proud to publish Permanent Record.”

Snowden, a former Central Intelligence Agency agent and National Security Agency contractor who now lives in exile in Russia, posted to Twitter Thursday a video promoting the book, which will come out on Constitution Day in the United States.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

Read More