Month: September 2020

Home / Month: September 2020

Civil rights advocates on Tuesday praised a federal judge in North Carolina who struck down the state’s new voter ID law, saying in her ruling that there was likely “discriminatory intent” behind state Republicans’ attempt to force voters to present specific forms of identification at the polls.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs wrote in her ruling that the law, S.B. 824, was the latest example of North Carolina’s “sordid history of racial discrimination and voter suppression stretching back to the time of slavery, through the era of Jim Crow, and, crucially, continuing up to the present day.”

GOP lawmakers overrode Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto of the law in 2019, two years after a federal appeals court struck down an earlier voter ID law which it said had cut many black North Carolinians out of the democratic process “with almost surgical precision”—as voter turnout among African Americans dropped by six percent when it was in effect.

Biggs noted Tuesday that S.B. 824 had been pushed forward by many of the same legislators who had passed the earlier law.

The latest effort by Republicans to require specific forms of identification at the polls would have allowed voters to present a driver’s license, passport, or military ID in order to vote, but not a public assistance ID card. Biggs described the latter stipulation as “particularly suspect,” as nearly 29 percent of North Carolinians who use SNAP benefits are black.

“The evidence suggests that minority voters are not just less likely to have an acceptable form of ID, but that the legislature excluded photographic ID that could have greatly reduced that discrepancy,” the judge wrote. 

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Political reporter Will Doran of the News & Observer noted that the federal court had announced its plans to strike down S.B. 824 last week, but it hadn’t been clear that the law would be blocked for all of the 2020 election.

“We knew this was coming, but not in such a sweeping fashion,” tweeted Doran.

Rev. T. Anthony Spearman, president of the North Carolina conference of the NAACP, called the strong language Biggs used in her ruling “so appropriate” considering the stakes of the 2020 elections.

Click Here: gold coast suns 2019 guernsey

“I hope it is something that will encourage people who have not exercised their right to vote to cast their votes,” Spearman told the Washington Post.

Biggs also ordered state officials to publicize the news that voter IDs would not be needed to vote in the March 3 presidential primary and other state elections for the time being.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

The man known as “The Walking Weapon” will be making his first appearance on the red mat of Josh Barnett’s Bloodsport.

Former Impact Wrestling Tag Team Champion Josh Alexander was announced by Barnett and GCW Monday night as the first participant for the Sunday, October 11th show that is part of GCW’s The Collective weekend in Indianapolis, IN.

The 33-year-old Canadian is in the second year of a three year deal with Impact Wrestling where he and longtime partner Ethan Page set the company record for the longest tag team title reign.

Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

This will be the third Bloodsport show under the Barnett name as he took it over from Matt Riddle starting in 2019. The shows have featured between 7-10 matches in a wrestling ring with no ropes or turnbuckles. The matches can only end in either knockout or submission.

This year’s show was originally set for WrestleMania weekend in Tampa, Florida.

Read More

In statements that highlighted the additional unintended consequences and innocent deaths that may have resulted from President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off a violent escalation with Iran by assassinating one of its top military commanders last week, U.S. and Canadian officials announced Thursday their claim that it was likely an Iranian missile that downed a Ukrainian commercial airliner on Tuesday, killing all 176 passengers and crew on board.

According to news sources, U.S. officials are expressing a “high level of confidence” that the plane did not crash due to mechanical or other failures, but was rather shot out of the sky by an Iranian surface-to-air missile—likely by accident—not long after taking off from the airport in Tehran.

As the New York Times reports:

Following the new and selective leaks from U.S. intelligence about the downed plane, Canada’s Prime Minister on Thursday said his country’s intelligence services also had reason to believe that an Iranian missile was the culprit. Sixty-three Canadians who were heading back home when the plane crashed were among the victims.

“This may have been unintentional,” Trudeau said at a press conference in Ottowa, but added that the “intelligence and evidence suggests that it’s a surface to air strike.” Trudeau, expressing sympathy for all the victims and their families, called for a thorough investigation into the crash.

Anti-war voices and members of the international community have placed the blame for the recent escalation in violence squarely at the feet of Trump for his decision last week to order the assassination of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.

Even if Iran was shown to have shot down the jetliner, some observers were quick to argue that Trump has the blood of the victims “on his hands” for touching off the violence with an assassination both he and his top cabinet members knew full well would lead to retaliation from Tehran. Other voices called for blame to be placed aside, however, until a full verification of what took place with the tragic crash and loss of life.

Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

Given the U.S. government’s record of lying and leaking misleading intelligence to serve its own interests—a practice shared by many government agencies in the world—critical voices said that first and foremost such accusations must be confirmed with credible evidence and transparent investigations.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said his intention is to speak with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani directly about the crash and the investigation surrounding it. “Undoubtedly, the priority for Ukraine is to identify the causes of the plane crash,” Zelenskiy said. “We will surely find out the truth.”

At this point, with scant information verified by news organizations or third-party investigations, independent reporters like Shadowproof‘s Kevin Gosztola warned both journalists and broadcasters—given the tragic circumstances and the gravity of the possible repercussions—to treat the claims of U.S. and other intelligence agencies with skepticism.

“Every bit of speculation and prejudiced belief expressed by the Trump administration about crashed Ukraine airliner,” Gosztola advised in a tweet, “must be backed up with concrete evidence. Otherwise, it is quite clearly to justify escalating war against Iran.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Climate advocacy groups and campaigners celebrated after the Guardian announced Wednesday that it “will no longer accept accept advertising from oil and gas companies,” which applies “to any business primarily involved in extracting fossil fuels, including many of the world’s largest polluters,” and urged media outlets across the globe to follow the British daily newspaper’s lead.

“Other media outlets, arts and sports organizations must now follow suit and end fossil fuel company advertising and sponsorship.”
—Mel Evans, Greenpeace U.K.

Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019

Welcoming the move in a statement, Greenpeace U.K. senior climate campaigner Mel Evans said that “for too long fossil fuel giants like BP and Shell, who are causing our climate emergency, have been able to get away with greenwash advertising while investing 97% of their business in oil and gas.”

“This is a watershed moment, and the Guardian must be applauded for this bold move to end the legitimacy of fossil fuels,” Evans said. “Oil and gas firms now find themselves alongside tobacco companies as businesses that threaten the health and well-being of everyone on this planet.”

“For BP the disconnect has been the most glaring: spending millions on lobbying to undermine environmental laws, then claiming to be progressive on climate in ads and on social media,” she added. “Other media outlets, arts and sports organizations must now follow suit and end fossil fuel company advertising and sponsorship.”

The Guardian‘s decision comes after Greenpeace U.K. launched a petition last year—now signed by more than 125,000 people—calling for an end to all oil advertising on billboards, magazines, television, and online. The local group circulated its petition on Twitter while Greenpeace’s global account asked, “Who’s next?”

The environmental advocacy group 350.org Europe also praised the newspaper, tweeting: “Big props to [the Guardian] for stepping up and finally doing the right thing.”

“Time is long overdue for all: media outlets, museums, universities, banks, governments, and everyone else to CUT ALL TIES with the fossil fuel industry,” the group added.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg, whose climate activism spurred the global Fridays for Future school strike movement, called the decision “a good start” and asked, “Who will take this further?”

By the Guardian‘s own account, it is “the first major global news organization to institute an outright ban” of this nature. However, it does follow in the footsteps of the Swedish daily newspaper Dagens ETC, which announced in September 2019 that “from now on we will reject all fossil-fuel ads.”

Dagens ETC editor-in-chief Andreas Gustavsson said at the time that “this is in the interests of our subscribers, our reporters, our climate friendly advertisers, and our credibility.” While recognizing that “a restrictive advertising policy means we take a financial hit,” Gustavsson encouraged other media outlets to adopt similar standards.

Guardian Media Group (GMG) acting chief executive Anna Bateson and chief revenue officer Hamish Nicklin explained the reasoning behind the new policy in a joint statement Wednesday.

“Our decision is based on the decades-long efforts by many in that industry to prevent meaningful climate action by governments around the world,” Bateson and Nicklin said. Calling human-caused global heating the “most important challenge of our times,” they pointed to their newspaper’s reporting on how the fossil fuel industry has spent decades sowing public doubt about climate science.

“Our decision is based on the decades-long efforts by many in that industry to prevent meaningful climate action by governments around the world.”
—Anna Bateson and Hamish Nicklin, GMG

Acknowledging the expected impact of the decision, they said that “the funding model for the Guardian—like most high-quality media companies—is going to remain precarious over the next few years. It’s true that rejecting some adverts might make our lives a tiny bit tougher in the very short term. Nonetheless, we believe building a more purposeful organization and remaining financially sustainable have to go hand in hand.”

As of now, the new policy doesn’t extend to other companies and industries that contribute to global heating, such as travel and vehicles. Bateson and Nicklin said that “stopping those ads would be a severe financial blow, and might force us to make significant cuts to Guardian and Observer journalism around the world.” The Observer, a sister paper to the Guardian that’s also owned by GMG, is published on Sundays.

Like the climate campaigners, Bateson and Nicklin expressed hope that others will be inspired to take similar steps in cutting ties with major polluters.

“We believe many brands will agree with our stance, and might be persuaded to choose to work with us more as a result,” they said. “The future of advertising lies in building trust with consumers, and demonstrating a real commitment to values and purpose.”

Media organizations aren’t the only institutions under mounting pressure to end financial relationships with major polluters. As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, global advocacy groups launched Stop the Money Pipeline, a campaign demanding that banks, insurance companies, and asset managers stop funding, insuring, and investing in climate destruction.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

As the U.S. Senate on Tuesday began debating the rules that will dictate the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump going forward, progressive groups continued their denunciation of the proposal put forth by Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who they charge has set the stage for a legal process that will “amount to nothing more than a fact-free sham trial perpetrated in the dead of night.”

That specific characterization was from Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, who echoed both Democratic members of Congress and other outside voices who have made clear their belief that McConnell and his fellow Republicans are not interested in offering the American people a transparent look at the facts or upholding their constitutional oath to act as unbiased jurors, but are instead operating to cover for the president.

“Any Senator voting for this proposal is voting to bring shame upon themselves and upon the United States Senate,” said Hobert Flynn. “The trial proposal would not necessarily allow witnesses, hear new evidence, or even admit existing evidence from the House unless a majority of Senators agree to it.”

Watch Thursday’s floor debate over the trial rules:

In his opening remarks Tuesday afternoon as the debate over the rules began, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked, “If the president is so confident in his case, if Leader McConnell is so confident the president did nothing wrong, why don’t they want the case to be presented in broad daylight?”

The rules package proposed by McConnell, said Schumer, “is nothing short of a national disgrace.”

An impeachment trial like the one proposed by McConnell, said Hobert Flynn, “would be a rush to a predetermined judgement—a disgraceful judgement condoning the abuse of the powers of the office of the President of the United States. We urge Republican Senators to put their country before their party and reject the show trial proposed by Sen. McConnell. History and the American people are watching.”

While McConnell’s conduct has stirred outrage among those demanding a fair trial—with the impeachment rules sparking the latest McConnell-themed hashtag on social media, #MidnightMitch—journalist Sean Illing wrote for Vox.com that nobody familiar with the Majority Leader will be shocked in the least by what the nation is now witnessing.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

For those who don’t know McConnell, Illing explained, “know this: He’s arguably the most ruthless political operator in American politics and has almost single-handedly broken the Senate.” He further noted:

In their response to Trump’s official answer to impeachment charges levied against him, the House Managers—a seven-member team of House Democrats prosecuting the case against Trump before the Senate and the presiding Supreme Court Justice John Roberts—on Tuesday said the responsibility before senators is fundamental to the oath to the constitution each of them took.

The fact that Trump “continues to insist that he has done nothing wrong” and “that he cannot be held accountable, except in an election he seeks to fix in his favor, underscores the need for the Senate to exercise its solemn constitutional duty to remove President Trump from office,” the Managers said in a joint statement.

“If the Senate does not convict and remove President Trump,” they continued, “he will have succeeded in placing himself above the law. Each Senator should set aside partisanship and politics and hold President Trump accountable to protect our national security and democracy.”

The Democrats held a mid-day press conference Thursday to detail their displeasure with McConnell’s proposal:

While Trump and his GOP allies have asserted that the kind of abuse of power for which the president stands accused does not warrant impeachment, the Democrat’s prosecution team said such a position is not only wrong, but dangerous.

“That argument would mean that, even accepting that the House’s recitation of the facts is correct—which it is—the House lacks authority to remove a President who sells out our democracy and national security in exchange for a personal political favor,” the Managers wrote. “The Framers of our Constitution took pains to ensure that such egregious abuses of power would be impeachable.”

The seriousness of the charges against the president, and the preponderance of evidence, has led critics of McConnell to only be more outspoken about his central role in helping to run interference for Trump.

“This is not a process for a fair trial, this is the process for a rigged trial,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and lead manager for the Senate trial.

Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership

Like countless others, Schiff to described what the Senate is doing with one hyphenated word. It’s a “cover-up,” he said.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Presidential candidate Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE said Thursday that he doubts the Mueller report will change much politically for President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE. 

“Politically, I’m not sure it will change much,” he said while appearing on “Late Night with Seth Meyers.” “If we really want to send Trumpism into the history books, the best thing we can do is defeat it decisively at the ballot box in 2020.”

The mayor of South Bend, Ind., said, however, that he believes Trump’s behavior as detailed in the report was “unethical” and “legally problematic.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“There was a lot of behavior that was at best unethical and legally problematic, to put it charitably,” he said. “The way that the attorney general conducted himself as though he were the personal attorney of the president was incredibly troubling too.” 

The Justice Department on Thursday released a redacted version of special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerCNN’s Toobin warns McCabe is in ‘perilous condition’ with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill’s 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s report. Prior to the report’s release, Attorney General William BarrBill BarrMilley discussed resigning from post after Trump photo-op: report OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ MORE held a press conference in which he defended Trump. Democrats and media figures have questioned whether the conference was appropriate. 

Buttigieg officially launched his presidential campaign on Sunday. He is one of more than a dozen people competing for the Democratic Party’s 2020 nomination. 

Click Here: camisetas de futbol baratas

Buttigieg draws new scrutiny, criticism

September 8, 2020 | News | No Comments

Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE’s early success in the Democratic presidential primary has prompted scrutiny and rougher treatment from his rivals and the news media, creating new challenges for the rising star and his campaign.

National media outlets are flooding the phone lines of local activists and politicians in South Bend, Ind., to churn out investigative pieces on Buttigieg’s years as the city’s mayor.

Competing Democratic campaigns have taken aim, engaging with Buttigieg over perceived slights on the campaign trail.

ADVERTISEMENT

After Buttigieg praised Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.) this week for tapping into the anti-establishment sentiment that swept the country in 2016, the Sanders camp ripped the mayor for drawing a comparison between supporters of Sanders and President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE.

“Come on @PeteButtigieg,” tweeted Rep. Ro KhannaRohit (Ro) KhannaProgressive Caucus co-chair endorses Kennedy in Massachusetts Senate primary Biden’s right, we need policing reform now – the House should quickly take up his call to action The Hill’s Coronavirus Report: Association of American Railroads Ian Jefferies says no place for hate, racism or bigotry in rail industry or society; Trump declares victory in response to promising jobs report MORE (D-Calif.), who is Sanders’s national co-chairman. “It is intellectually dishonest to compare Bernie to Trump. Bernie is for giving people healthcare, education, childcare, and more pay. He wants to blow up credentialed elitism — those who reject tuition free college for all.”

Some in Buttigieg’s camp view the flap as evidence they’re on Sanders’s radar.

Instead of ducking the fight, the mayor seemed to up the ante on Wednesday by telling The New York Times that the “novelty” may have worn off the Sanders campaign and questioning whether he could reassemble the same coalition that propelled him through the 2016 primaries.

“I have a hard time seeing the coalition ultimately coming together there,” he said.

Sanders and Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE, who is expected to enter the Democratic race on Thursday, are seen as the front-runners for the party’s presidential nomination. Buttigieg in the last month has broken into the top tier, however, which promises to bring more attacks from his rivals.

Buttigieg’s allies say he’s weathered the heat with poise so far. They welcome the scrutiny, saying it’s evidence that Buttigieg is being treated as a top contender.

In particular, they’re relishing the attention from the rival campaigns and Republicans, believing Buttigieg has rattled the competition with his fast rise from obscurity.

“It shows they think he’s for real,” said one Democrat who supports Buttigieg.

Republicans have begun to attack Buttigieg, who has won more media attention by publicly feuding with Vice President Pence, a fellow Hoosier who at times has seemed surprised by Buttigieg’s attacks on him.

The conservative super PAC America Rising is filing Freedom of Information Act requests and monitoring Buttigieg’s daily activities with trackers on the ground at his public events.

The Republican National Committee, which is partnering with America Rising, has been filing public records requests with the mayor’s office and digging through Buttigieg’s personal and campaign financial disclosures.

The Great America PAC, a top super PAC supporting Trump’s reelection campaign, is compiling its own dossier on Buttigieg, starting from the early days. An operative from the group has been on the ground in Massachusetts looking into Buttigieg’s time at Harvard.

And the Indiana Republican Party has been tracking Buttigieg since he first ran for statewide office in 2010 and might have the most comprehensive collection of records on him. It ramped up its release of opposition research in the wake of the Buttigieg-Pence feud.

Democrats say the GOP attacks show Republicans think he could be the Democratic nominee.

“Look, there’s no straight lines in a campaign,” said the Democrat who supports Buttigieg. “We’ve been riding a positive wave for weeks now. There are going to be bumps, but to know that Republicans are going after him now, that just means he’s officially arrived.”

Buttigieg has received tougher media scrutiny since rising in the polls.

He moved up the Democratic charts in March with a strong performance at a CNN town hall event, where many were seeing him for the first time.

At a follow-up CNN town hall event this week, Buttigieg had to defend his record as mayor after several outlets, including The Hill, reported on decisions he made that critics say negatively impacted communities of color.

Buttigieg is standing by his decision to demote South Bend’s first-ever African American police chief, who secretly recorded one of his white officers and did not tell the mayor’s office about a federal investigation into the department’s recording practices. There are allegations that the recordings captured white officers on the police force using racist language, angering activists in a town that is a quarter black.

Buttigieg defied a city council subpoena to obtain the tapes, arguing that a judge needs to decide whether the recordings violate federal wiretapping laws.

“I was a little bit slow to understand just how much anguish underlaid the community’s response to this,” Buttigieg said at the town hall. “It was about whether communities of color could trust that their police department has their best interests at heart.”

And Buttigieg acknowledged problems with a program he implemented to raze vacant and abandoned homes in poor parts of South Bend, which some say led to minority families being priced out of their neighborhoods.

“No policy is perfect, and we learned some things the hard way on this one,” Buttigieg said.

Those controversies have drawn attention to Buttigieg’s record on diversity. Rep. André Carson (D-Ind.), who describes himself as friends with Buttigieg, said that’s something the South Bend mayor is working on.

“For him to kind of be at least objective enough to know as a leader he needs more diversity, that includes his team, that includes the folks that work for him, that includes the contracts that he issues, so there’s folks willing to help him with the diversity issues, we just have to have a sit down about it,” Carson said on CNN on Wednesday.

Still, Buttigieg has a knack for winning positive headlines. On Wednesday he went viral on Twitter for responding to a supporter in sign language.

Click Here: Golf special

Chris Meagher, a Buttigieg campaign spokesman, said the campaign is looking to stay above the fray.

“We can’t control our competitors’ strategies, but we will continue to focus on getting our hopeful message of generational change out to folks,” Meagher said.

This story was updated at 5:39 p.m.

Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names MORE (D-Mass.) in an op-ed published by Essence on Tuesday detailed her plan to combat maternal mortality rates among black women, writing that the maternal mortality crisis is an “epidemic” for black women. 

“The data shows that Black women are three to four times more likely than white women to die from pregnancy or childbirth-related causes. This trend persists even after adjusting for income and education. One major reason? Racism,” wrote Warren, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president in 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

Warren, who first unveiled her plan last week, said in the op-ed that her plan is to “hold health systems accountable for protecting black moms.”

Under her plan, health systems that show improved outcomes would receive bonuses. Those that don’t would be “on the hook” but not “abandoned,” she wrote. Warren called for “identifying, investing in, and demanding more from struggling” health systems. 

“If health systems are able to coordinate their care and improve overall outcomes — like raising survival rates, reducing complications, and narrowing the mortality and morbidity gap between white women and women of color — they can earn a bonus,” she said.

“If care doesn’t improve, they’ll be on the hook. But they won’t be abandoned. Paying for better care means both rewarding excellent health systems and identifying, investing in, and demanding more from struggling ones,” Warren added. 

She added that proposals for reform “have limits,” saying “they cannot reach all of the underlying causes of these inequities.”

“They’re no substitute for the kind of guaranteed, comprehensive access to general and reproductive health care for women long before pregnancy,” Warren wrote. “And they must be carefully designed and monitored to avoid unintended consequences.”

Click Here: camiseta rosario central

An Iowa middle school student became emotional discussing school shootings with former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas) Monday.

“Ever since Columbine and Sandy Hook, school shootings have become a regular occurrence to see in the news,” the student, an eighth-grader at Berg Middle School in Newton, said to O’Rourke during a campaign stop. “Society is becoming numb to children being slaughtered. Victims and survivors aren’t just numbers. They are human beings.”

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

At this point, the student paused to collect herself, apologizing, before decrying the “little to no effort by the government” to protect students in the wake of school shootings. “I’m afraid that one day, I’ll go to school and I’ll never come out,” she said, tearing up.

O’Rourke thanked her for discussing the issue in “the most personal, powerful terms possible,” saying that in U.S. history, “the big changes that needed to happen did not come from people who were already in positions of power or trust; it so often came from young people who forced the issue,” citing the pressure young civil rights activists applied to then-President Lyndon Johnson and other elected officials in the 1960s.

“[T]hese kids are asking about Marjory Stoneman Douglas and worried it can happen here,” said Geoff Burgan, O’Rourke’s Iowa communications director, in a tweet accompanying the footage. “This was never something we dealt with growing up. It’s heartbreaking.”

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, in Parkland, Fla., was the site of a shooting in 2018 that killed 17 students and staff. 

The exchange came the same day O’Rourke’s fellow presidential candidate, Sen. Cory BookerCory Anthony BookerRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants Black lawmakers unveil bill to remove Confederate statues from Capitol Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk MORE (D-N.J.), rolled out a comprehensive plan to address gun violence, including a proposed licensing program that would require prospective gun owners to meet “certain basic safety and training standards.” 

Poll: Trump and Biden statistically tied in Florida

September 8, 2020 | News | No Comments

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE and President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE are statistically tied in a hypothetical 2020 matchup in the crucial swing state of Florida, according to a new survey.

Biden narrowly edged out Trump by half a point in the St. Pete Polls survey, published by Florida Politics on Thursday, earning 47.3 percent of general election voters’ support to Trump’s 46.8 percent. The remaining 5.9 percent of voters said they were undecided. The gap is well within the poll’s 1.8 percentage point margin of error. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Democrat was boosted by support from black voters, 90 to 2.8 percent, and beat Trump among voters aged 18–69. However, Trump was backed by more voters over 70 years old and had the support of 40 percent of Hispanic voters, 7 points more than he got in 2016 when he won the state over Democratic presidential nominee Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE.

A plurality of Florida voters also said they approved of the job Trump is doing as president by a 48.7 to 47.3 percent margin.

The new survey comes after surveys show Biden with leads over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, all swing states that helped Trump win the White House in 2016. A Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday showed Biden with a 9-point lead over Trump in a hypothetical Florida matchup.

Statewide elections in Florida are often decided by razor-thin margins, and both parties are expected to invest heavily in a state that could have the power to singlehandedly decide the 2020 contest.

The Trump campaign decided to hold its launch in Orlando, Fla., this week and is planning to use the state to test a Latino voter outreach initiative. Trump also hopes his extensive efforts to boost Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Gov. Ron DeSantisRonald Dion DeSantisGOP tentatively decides on Jacksonville for site of convention DeSantis pushing to host Republican National Convention in Florida Florida bars and theaters to reopen starting Friday, DeSantis says MORE (R) in the 2018 midterms will pay dividends.

Across the aisle, Andrew Gillum, the 2018 Democratic candidate for Florida governor, is leading an effort to register 1 million new voters ahead of the 2020 presidential election. The state’s Democratic Party is also planning to spend $2 million to register an additional 200,000 voters. 

The St. Pete poll surveyed 3,095 likely Florida general election voters from June 15 to 16.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks