October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
President Barack Obama’s creation on Friday of the world’s largest marine protected area drew praise from lawmakers, Hawaiian community members, and environmental groups alike, who say it will help protect biodiversity and increase resilience in the face of climate change.
Obama is expanding the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument off the coast of Hawaii, more than quadrupling it in size to 582,578 square miles.
A White House fact sheet says the expansion, which also bans commercial resource extraction, will afford “critical protections for more than 7,000 marine species,” “improve ocean resilience,” and help preserve “resources of great historical and cultural significance.”
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), who was among those who had proposed the expansion to the president, praised the move, calling it “one of the most important actions an American president has ever taken for the health of the oceans.” He noted, however, that it was “only beginning” because “management, research, educational opportunities, and enforcement” need to follow.
Similarly welcoming the move was Sen. Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawaii), who said the expansion “will help to combat climate change, preserve biodiversity, and honor cultural traditions.”
Calling it “a bold decision that will have lasting benefits for Hawaii’s unique ecosystem,” Greenpeace oceans campaign director John Hocevar said, “Setting aside areas closed to fishing, drilling, and other extractive uses is the best way to protect biodiversity, rebuild depleted fish populations, and increase the resilience of marine ecosystems so they can better withstand the impacts of climate change.”
Yet, he added, “Bolder steps are still needed” as “Less than two percent of the world’s oceans are protected from fishing, and many scientists suggest a target of 40 percent.”
That target, he continued, “in remote areas as well as those closer to home—will help preserve the health of our oceans and our communities.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019
Thousands of signatures had already been delivered to call for the expansion.
Ashley Watts, a marine biologist, wrote that it “would not only protect critical ocean resources at a time when they’re under threat, it would also be the best thing in the long run for fishermen and lovers of Hawaii seafood.” The calls came from younger community members as well, like five-year-old Zeke from Maui who said the expansion would “help protect our ocean and sea life,” or a 14-year-old who argued that “every generation that comes is responsible for protecting this Earth that is all of our homes.”
Other communities members stressed a different point: “I believe the United States has a moral obligation to protect the resources in that area for the time when the United States de-occupies our nation so we can resume control of what is actually ours,” said one man at a public forum.
Obama’s announcement comes just ahead of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Conservation Congress, which will be convening in Honolulu, and a day after the National Park Service celebrated its 100th birthday.
Papahānaumokuākea was first declared a national monument in 2006 by President George W. Bush, and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2010. A press statement from the Department of the Interior explains that Papahānaumokuākea’s “biological and geographic isolation, coupled with singular oceanographic and geological conditions, have produced some of the most unique and diverse ecological communities on the planet.”
Marine life scored another win this week when Chile created the 186,433 square-mile Nazca-Desventuradas Marine Park. “In times when oceans are hit by the overexploitation of species, pollution, and phenomena such as climate change, the protection of these islands means a great step forward for oceans in Chile and the rest of the world,” said Liesbeth van der Meer, executive director of Oceana Chile.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Prisoners across the United States are launching a massive strike on Friday, on the 45th anniversary of the Attica prison uprising, to protest what they call modern-day slavery.
Organizers say the strike will take place in at least 24 states to protest inhumane living and working conditions, forced labor, and the cycle of the criminal justice system itself. In California alone, 800 people are expected to take part in the work stoppage. It is slated to be one of the largest strikes in history.
In the era of Black Lives Matter, the issues of racist policing, the school-to-prison pipeline, and other factors that contribute to the mass incarceration crisis are coming to the forefront of civil and human rights movements.
“Slavery is alive and well in the prison system, but by the end of this year, it won’t be anymore,” reads the call to action from groups including Support Prisoner Resistance, the Free Alabama Movement, and the Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee (IWOC). “This is a call to end slavery in America.”
It continues:
As the organizers explain in their call to action, “Certain Americans live every day under not only the threat of extra-judicial execution—as protests surrounding the deaths of Mike Brown, Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland, and so many others have drawn long overdue attention to—but also under the threat of capture, of being thrown into these plantations, shackled and forced to work.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“Work is good for anyone,” Melvin Ray, an inmate at the W.E. Donaldson Correctional Facility in Bessemer, Alabama, and Free Alabama Movement organizer, told Mother Jones on Friday. “The problem is that our work is producing services that we’re being charged for, that we don’t get any compensation from.”
#prisonstrike Tweets |
Prison wages, which range from a few cents to $1.15 an hour, are determined on a state-by-state basis; in many states, such as Texas, Arkansas, and Georgia, inmates are not paid at all. Meanwhile, items in the prison commissary are often hiked up from their market value, making them increasingly inaccessible to the inmates themselves. And as Prison Legal News editor Paul Wright explained to Mother Jones, those who refuse to work are subject to retaliation, including having their sentences lengthened or being held in solitary confinement.
The jobs themselves can vary from farming and manufacturing to doing call work for private phone companies such as AT&T and Verizon, as well as work that keeps the prison itself running, such as laundry or kitchen service.
Azzurra Crispino, media co-chair of the IWOC, told Shadowproof that the conditions are often dangerous. “We’ve had reports of people being asked to operate heavy machinery with standing water on the ground,” she said. “In Texas, no air-conditioning, in a lot of the units. Last year, the heat in Texas was 116 degrees. You can imagine what it’s like working in a kitchen, in a unit with no air conditioning.”
The strike is only the first step in a sustained plan of resistance, the organizers said. The actions are scheduled to continue to “[build] the networks of solidarity and [show] that we’re serious and what we’re capable of.”
Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership
To that end, the organizers are calling on supporters on the outside to take part in events around the country, including demonstrations, fundraising benefits, marches, discussions and film screenings, teach-ins and phone banking, and other efforts.
“Prison impacts everyone, when we stand up and refuse on September 9th, 2016, we need to know our friends, families, and allies on the outside will have our backs,” the call to action reads. “Step up, stand up, and join us. Against prison slavery. For liberation of all.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Following a disciplinary review hearing which took place Thursday, U.S. Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning confirmed early Friday morning she has been sentenced to solitary confinement for attempting to take her own life while serving a 30-year prison sentence at Ft. Leavenworth prison in Kansas.
The attempted suicide took place in July and, according to Fight for the Future, a group which has advocated on her behalf, followed “years of the government systematically denying her access to medically recommended treatment for gender dysphoria, and previous threats of solitary confinement following minor prison ‘infractions,’ including possession of mislabeled general research materials that Chelsea used for article writing and an expired tube of toothpaste.”
Earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported, Manning ended a five-day hunger strike after the military finally agreed to provide her with gender transition surgery as well as other medically prescribed treatments.
In 2013, Manning was convicted by a military court for passing military and government documents to the media outlet Wikileaks, many of which contained evidence of possible war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Click Here: los jaguares argentina
Manning’s attorney, the ACLU’s Chase Strangio, confirmed the sentence of solitary confinement in a tweet Friday:
Following the ruling, Manning released the following statement to supporters:
In addition to supporters who have railed against the military’s treatment of Manning while incarcerated at Ft. Leavenworth, a larger effort is being made to have her released from prison altogether.
As with other whistleblowers charged with criminal conduct for their alleged disclosures under the Obama administration—including Edward Snowden, Jeffrey Sterling, Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou, and others—Manning’s advocates argue she should received a presidential pardon.
“It should be beyond question at this point that the archive that Manning gave to WikiLeaks – and that was later published in part by the Guardian and New York Times – is one of the richest and most comprehensive databases on world affairs that has ever existed; its contribution to the public record at this point is almost incalculable,” wrote Trevor Timm, co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, in an op-ed last week. “To give you an idea: in just the past month, the New York Times has cited Manning’s state department cables in at least five different stories. And that’s almost six years after they first started making headlines.”
Timm said it’s “past time the administration did the right thing,” and let her go.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A federal judge has ordered that former CIA officials can be deposed in a lawsuit against the architects of the agency’s torture program, in what human rights advocates say is a vital step for accountability.
The order (pdf), issued by U.S. District Court Senior Judge Justin Quackenbush earlier this week, rejected an attempt by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that would have protected the officials from oral questioning. The deposition will be carried out as part of a discovery process for a case against the program’s architects, psychologists James Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of three men who were subjected to beatings, exposure to extreme temperature, sleep and food deprivation, and other abuses while in CIA custody.
Two of the four officials are John Rizzo and Jose Rodriguez, who both held high-ranking positions in the agency at the time the torture program was being developed and implemented. In a blog post about the order, the ACLU wrote of Rizzo, who was the CIA’s chief lawyer for much of George W. Bush’s administration:
Rodriguez has also defended the CIA’s torture of detainees and, while at the agency, authorized the use of certain tactics. He also ordered the destruction of scores of videotapes showing waterboarding and other torture.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“This ruling is a critical step towards accountability, and it charts a way forward for torture victims to get their day in court,” said ACLU staff attorney Dror Ladin. “For years, claims of secrecy shut the courthouse doors to survivors, but the systematic abuse of prisoners can’t be swept under the rug forever. This order affirms that our judicial system can handle claims of CIA torture, including when those claims involve high-level government officials.”
Two of the plaintiffs, Suleiman Abdullah Salim and Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud, survived but continue to struggle physically and psychologically, the ACLU said. The third man, Gul Rahman, died of hypothermia in a secret CIA prison.
In a hearing last week, DOJ attorney Andrew Warden said, “It is, frankly, unprecedented…for the nation’s top spy, the head of the National Clandestine Service to be deposed on operational information by a private party. I don’t think that’s ever happened in the history of this country.”
The lawsuit against Mitchell and Jessen was filed in Washington state, where their law firm was based and where Jessen lives to this day. Although the ACLU says the depositions may help provide additional information about the program, the rights organization says the evidence they need to win the case has already been made public through reports like the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s executive summary of its torture investigation.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: cheap sydney roosters jersey
October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Voters in U.S. counties previously covered by the Voting Rights Act (VRA) will have at least 868 fewer places to cast ballots in the 2016 election than they did previously, according to a new analysis released Friday.
In fact, the report (pdf) from the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights finds that in the wake of the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision gutting the VRA, “[c]ounties and states with known records of voting discrimination are closing polling places on a massive scale.” This is among other negative outcomes of the ruling, which Common Dreams has covered extensively.
Many closures happened in places that would have had to gain federal approval to change voting laws prior to the high court’s ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, “which made Section 5 of the VRA inoperable and opened the door to racial discrimination at every juncture of the electoral process,” as the report explains.
Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey
In North Carolina, for example:
And in Texas:
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
While the Leadership Conference acknowledges that “[t]here are justifiable reasons to reduce polling places and consolidations can be executed equitably,” it also points out that “the loss of Section 5 means that there is no process to ensure that reductions are disclosed to the public, are conducted with the input of impacted communities, and do not discriminate against voters of color.”
Indeed, the analysis notes that “[p]olling place closures are a particularly common and pernicious tactic for disenfranchising voters of color. Decisions to shutter or reduce voting locations are often made quietly and at the last minute, making pre-election intervention or litigation virtually impossible. These changes can place an undue burden on minority voters, who may be less likely to have access to public transportation or vehicles, given continuing disparities in socioeconomic resources.”
As Ari Berman writes for The Nation:
With four days to go until the election, the Leadership Conference is urging people to check their polling place locations with the following tools:
- Rock the Vote’s Polling Place Finder
- League of Women Voters’ Vote411.org
- Election Protection Hotline: 866.OUR.VOTE
But in the longer term, the organization is calling on Congress to pass one of two pending bills to restore the VRA. Both pieces of legislation would restore transparency and notice requirements for certain voting changes like polling place closures. “And both include an updated formula for determining which states and counties should have their voting changes—including their proposed polling place reductions and consolidation—subject to federal oversight to ensure they are not racially discriminatory,” the Leadership Conference writes.
However, it concludes: “Congress has yet to advance either bill.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A Republican super PAC with ties to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote GOP senator to try to reverse requirement that Pentagon remove Confederate names from bases No, ‘blue states’ do not bail out ‘red states’ MORE (R-Ky.) on Tuesday took a shot at former Arizona state Sen. Kelli Ward (R), arguing that she will not be the Republican nominee in the wake of Sen. Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeGOP lawmakers stick to Trump amid new criticism Kelly holds double-digit lead over McSally in Arizona: poll Trump asserts his power over Republicans MORE’s (R-Ariz.) decision to not run for reelection.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF) has been critical of Ward, who had launched a primary challenge to the right of Flake and has the backing of pro-Trump outside group Great America Alliance. Flake sent shockwaves throughout the political world when he announced on Tuesday that he wouldn’t run for a second term in 2018.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Sen. Jeff Flake will be remembered for a distinguished and impactful career in Congress, as well as his independent streak and genial manner,” Senate Leadership Fund president Steven Law said in a statement.
“The one political upshot of Sen. Flake’s decision today is that Steve Bannon’s hand-picked candidate, conspiracy-theorist Kelli Ward, will not be the Republican nominee for this Senate seat in 2018.”
Flake’s departure will likely open up the Republican field and now leaves a spot open for a candidate as an alternative to Ward.
Former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon, who had declared “war” against the GOP establishment, recently endorsed and campaigned with Ward in Arizona.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), the committee tasked with maintaining the party’s majority, also sent out a statement about Flake’s retirement, but didn’t mention Ward and only argued that the seat will remain red next year.
“While we are sad to see Senator Flake retire, we know that Arizona will stay in Republican hands after the upcoming election,” NRSC chairman Cory GardnerCory Scott GardnerSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Interior faces legal scrutiny for keeping controversial acting leaders in office | White House faces suit on order lifting endangered species protections | Lawmakers seek investigation of Park Police after clearing of protesters The Hill’s Campaign Report: Republicans go on attack over calls to ‘defund the police’ MORE (R-Colo.) said in a statement.
Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A GOP lawmaker is calling for the Senate to refuse to swear in Roy Moore (R) if the Alabama Senate candidate defeats Doug Jones (D) in a December special election.
Rep. Adam KinzingerAdam Daniel KinzingerRepublicans walk tightrope on police reform The Hill’s Coronavirus Report: National Portrait Gallery’s Kim Sajet says this era rewiring people’s relationship with culture, art; Trump’s war with Twitter heats up Cheney says Trump should stop tweeting Scarborough conspiracy MORE (R-Ill.) told CNN on Friday that he believes the allegations reported against Moore are true. The Washington Post this week reported allegations that Moore initiated sexual contact with a 14-year-old girl decades ago while serving as an assistant district attorney.
“I think Roy Moore needs to step aside now, these allegations are disgusting and I believe them,” Kinzinger said. “There’s no way to defend this. And second, I think the Senate should say that they will refuse to seat him, or in fact expel him if he is the senator from Alabama.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Kinzinger continued, saying that the accusations leveled against Moore go beyond voters’ right to pick their own senator.
“Look, Alabama has the right to pick their senators, but this is beyond the pale, to have this kind of contact with somebody when they were 14 years old,” he said. “I don’t care how long ago it was, he was an adult and there could be more information coming forward, who knows.”
“But this is a bridge too far,” he added. “And the Republican Party should disown every aspect of him.”
Moore has denied the allegations, calling them a joint effort from Jones’s campaign and The Washington Post to derail his Senate race when he was ahead in the polls.
Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks
“I believe they are politically motivated. I believe they are brought only to stop a very successful campaign, and that’s what they are doing. I’ve never known this woman,” Moore said on Sean Hannity’s radio show on Friday.
Two GOP senators pulled their endorsements from Moore’s campaign on Friday as pressure mounted from the allegations uncovered by the Post.
“Having read the detailed description of the incidents, as well as the response from Judge Moore and his campaign, I can no longer endorse his candidacy for the US Senate,” Sen. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Senate headed for late night vote amid standoff over lands bill Hillicon Valley: Facebook employees speak up against content decisions | Trump’s social media executive order on weak legal ground | Order divides conservatives MORE (R-Utah) said in a statement.
“I am pulling my endorsement and support for Roy Moore for U.S. Senate,” Sen. Steve DainesSteven (Steve) David DainesSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Koch-backed group launches ad campaign to support four vulnerable GOP senators OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Interior faces legal scrutiny for keeping controversial acting leaders in office | White House faces suit on order lifting endangered species protections | Lawmakers seek investigation of Park Police after clearing of protesters MORE (R-Mont.) tweeted.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
If it seems like Big Pharma has escaped accountability for its role in perpetuating the nation’s deadly opioid epidemic, those suspicions are not unfounded.
According to a former top Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) official, the industry’s influence over Congress has successfully quashed efforts to regulate the pharmaceutical drug market aiding an unprecedented addiction to legal drugs.
“When you sit with a parent who can’t understand why there’s so many pharmaceuticals out in the illicit marketplace, and why isn’t the government doing anything, well the DEA was doing something. Unfortunately what we’re trying to do is thwarted by people who are writing laws,” Joseph Rannazzisi, who for 10 years served as head of the DEA’s Diversion Control Division, told the Guardian.
In an exclusive investigation published on Monday, the Guardian, with Rannazzisi’s help, explains how Congress turned its back on suffering families and, under the guise of combating the national epidemic, has routinely passed legislation that effectively shields the industry.
One such law is the recently-passed Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act, which “requires the DEA to warn pharmacies and distributors if they are in breach of regulations”—namely “crooked doctors and pharmacists” in suspicion of over-prescribing prescription drugs—”and to give them a chance to comply before licenses are withdrawn,” the Guardian reports.
Rannazzisi declared the new law a “gift to the industry,” explaining how it does neither of the things it purports to do. “This doesn’t ensure patient access and it doesn’t help drug enforcement at all,” he said. “What this bill does is take away DEA’s ability to go after a pharmacist, a wholesaler, manufacturer or distributor.”
“The bill passed because ‘Big Pharma’ wanted it to pass,” he added. “When I was in charge what I tried to do was explain to my investigators and my agents that our job was to regulate the industry and they’re not going to like being regulated.”
The Washington Post has also been reporting on the drop in enforcement actions against pharmaceutical distributors, dubbed “pill mills,” which it said was due in part to “resistance from higher-level Justice Department officials who were being heavily lobbied by the wholesalers.”
“Congress would rather listen to people who had a profit motive rather than a public health and safety motive.”
Click Here: essendon bombers guernsey 2019—Joseph Rannazzisi
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Indeed, as the Guardian points out, the industry “has spent hundreds of millions of dollars in lobbying to stave off measures to reduce prescriptions and therefore sales of opioid painkillers.”
The Guardian continues:
Both Hatch and Rogers were reportedly “instrumental in legislation establishing a panel to examine treatment of pain that critics said had close ties to industry-funded groups.”
The problem of industry-influenced “pain management” panels was also highlighted earlier this year by Intercept reporter Lee Fang, who uncovered Big Pharma’s attempt to influence recently reissued guidelines from Centers for Disease Control (CDC) on opioid prescriptions.
One lawmaker who has been a vocal critical of this industry collusion is Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who said, “There is no question that the powerful opioid manufacturers have a disproportionate voice, a disproportionate amount of influence, in these debates.”
“Congress would rather listen to people who had a profit motive rather than a public health and safety motive,” said Rannazzisi. “As long as the industry has this stranglehold through lobbyists, nothing’s going to change.”
According to (pdf) the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “[s]ince 1999, the rate of overdose deaths involving opioids—including prescription opioid pain relievers and heroin—nearly quadrupled,” as over 165,000 people have died from prescription opioid overdoses.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A prominent Honduran leader of a rural land rights movement was killed on Monday night in what supporters claim was an assassination organized by wealthy landowners.
“How many more activists have to be brutally murdered before the authorities take effective action to protect them, or even be willing to talk about this crisis?”
—Erika Guevara-Rosas,
Amnesty InternationalJose Angel Flores, president of the Unified Campesinos Movement of the Aguan Valley, or MUCA, had been under police protection since March, teleSUR reported, after the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights ordered the Honduran state to protect him from death threats in 2014.
Former MUCA president Johnny Rivas, who hosts a radio show on the local station Radio Progreso, blamed “death squads chasing peasant families fighting for land rights” for the murder.
Of Flores’ organization, teleSUR wrote: “MUCA has been on the forefront of alternative food production and economic development projects in the Aguan on land recovered through large-scale land occupations. The movement struggles to strengthen food sovereignty while continuing to demand comprehensive agrarian reform.”
“The situation in the Aguan has been called the most intense agrarian conflict seen in Central America in the last 15 years,” the Latin American outlet added.
Flores was killed in Tocoa, in the northern Honduran department of Colon.
Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019
The Spanish-language wire service EPE reported on the details of the attack:
About 150 other activists have been killed so far in the region, the local campesinos organizations told teleSUR.
The battle between landowners and peasant farmers has led to so much bloodshed that people describe Bajo Aguan, where MUCA operates, as “killing fields.”
“Many illegal mass graves have been discovered in recent years,” teleSUR wrote.
Honduran Indigenous activist Berta Cáceres, who was assassinated in March, also devoted her life to fighting for land rights. Violence against land defenders is on the rise across Latin America, and Honduras remains one of the most dangerous countries for activists in the world.
“Honduras has turned into a ‘no-go zone’ for anyone daring to campaign for the protection of the environment. How many more activists have to be brutally murdered before the authorities take effective action to protect them, or even be willing to talk about this crisis?” said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director at Amnesty International.
And the U.S. continues to funnel millions of dollars in military funding to the Honduran government, despite the targeted assassinations and other human rights abuses.
“We are indignant that in the face of the ongoing and documented violence, repression and corruption involving the Honduran government, the U.S. State Department has certified that it is satisfied that the Honduran government has taken effective steps to improve human rights,” grassroots coalition Honduras Solidarity Network said Wednesday. “This clears the way for $55 million more in U.S. aid.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A combination of being the day after a pay-per-view and bringing back Ric Flair, Shawn Michaels, Big Show, and Christian allowed Raw to have a huge increase this week against the toughest competition in a long time.
Raw averaged 1.82 million viewers on the USA Network last night. In the 18-49 demo, the show did a 0.55 rating. Both numbers are up 10 percent from last week on a night where many going in expected the lowest ratings in the history of the show due to the competition.
And the competition was there. The Kansas City Chiefs vs. Baltimore Ravens NFL game did 14.02 million viewers and 4.60 in 18-49. The final game of the Stanley Cup finals series where the Tampa Bay Lightning beat the Dallas Stars did 2.88 million viewers and 0.8 in 18-49, which aired on NBC.
In addition, news shows were way up with Tucker Carlson doing 5.02 million viewers against the first hour of Raw, which was the highest hour.
The key was the big first hour of Raw, as there was a 14 percent first-to-third hour drop, larger than the show has been doing of late.
Raw was 28th for the night overall on cable, but only lost to football and SportsCenter on ESPN, and news shows on Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN, beating all entertainment shows in both total viewers and in 18-49.
Raw was fourth behind ESPN shows in males 18-49 on cable, fifth behind ESPN shows in 18-34, sixth in women 18-49, fifth in males 12-34, and fifth in women 12-34.
However, the year-to-year drops remain large. Raw was down 29 percent in viewers from the same week last year, down 38 percent in 18-49, and down 44 percent in 18-34.
As far as losses during the show, the women 18-49 drop was 15 percent from hour one to three, males 18-49 fell seven percent, teenage girls dropped 27 percent and teenage boys increased seven percent, while over 50, the largest audience, was down 15 percent.
The three hours were:
8 p.m. 1.96 million viewers
9 p.m. 1.82 million viewers
10 p.m. 1.69 million viewers