Month: October 2020

Home / Month: October 2020

Drivers for the ride-sharing app Uber protested in Los Angeles earlier this week, claiming the company, valued at $18 billion, has slashed their rates to an untenable level. 

Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

“I’ve experienced four cuts since I started,” driver Aya Valilar, who has been working with the company a year-and-a-half, told CBS2/KCAL9. “It was $2.50 a mile when I started a year and a half ago, and now we are at $1.10 a mile. You can’t make a living off of that.”

Uber takes a 20 percent commission on each ride, and drivers must pay for their own gas, car maintenance, insurance, and amenities such as water, gum, and phone chargers that clients have come to expect. While many customers assume that tips are factored into Uber rates, in fact no part of the fare is considered a tip.

In response, Uber issued a statement that read, in part: “Drivers are making more money now due to higher demand than they did before the price cut. We will continue to work with them individually to ensure their small businesses thrive.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The protest comes as Uber drivers are engaged in a larger fight for better working conditions. Last week, the California App-Based Drivers’ Association (CADA) met in El Monte, just east of Los Angeles, to formalize its affiliation with Teamsters Local 986. 

“We look forward to working with CADA to help the drivers win fairness in the workplace and help them get recognized for the work they do making Uber and other app-based companies successful,” said Chris Griswold, Secretary-Treasurer of Local 986 in South El Monte. “These app-based companies need to start treating their professional drivers with the respect and dignity that they deserve.”

Joseph DeWolf Sandoval, CADA Leadership Council Member, told Common Dreams that Uber’s rate cuts make it “extremely difficult to earn a living wage.” He dismissed Uber’s justification — that a higher volume of calls makes up for lower rates — as a “standard talking point” that doesn’t bear out when you run the numbers. 

“Uber is playing very fast and loose with their claims and calculations,” Sandoval said, suggesting that the only way to maintain a living wage, under the new conditions, is to drive more than is legally allowed for a commercial driver. CADA is also critical of Uber’s lack of meaningful communication with drivers — the company has flat-out refused to meet with CADA, and drivers don’t feel comfortable voicing grievances at Uber’s recently established “office hours” — and what Sandoval described as a “biased rating system” that “hangs over drivers’ heads like a sword on a slender thread.”

Uber did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

While the ride-sharing app is hugely popular, it has recently encountered some stumbling blocks. A similar protest over rates took place in Seattle last month. And on Tuesday, Germany took the unprecedented step of banning Uber nation-wide, saying the lack of licenses and insurance constituted a violation of the country’s competition law.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s decision this week to approve two new genetically engineered crops is being denounced by watchdog groups as a false solution to herbicide-resistant weeds and a move that threatens human and environment safety alike.

The crops are Dow AgroSciences’ Enlist corn and soybeans, engineered to be resistant to its Duo herbicide, which contains 2,4-D, a component of the notorious Agent Orange. 2,4-D has been linked to Parkinson’s, birth defects, reproductive problems, and endocrine disruption. Dow states that the new system will address the problem of weeds that have become resistant to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s widely-used Roundup.

Food and environmental safety groups, however, say that it speaks to the failure of the genetically engineered crops strategy that fosters herbicide expansion—profitable for the chemical companies—and ignores the paradigm shifted needed in the industrial agriculture system.

“With this approval comes millions of more pounds of toxic herbicides dumped onto our land; it’s an unacceptable outcome,” said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director for Center for Food Safety. His group noted that the USDA analysis acknowledges that the crops could lead to as much as a 7-fold increase in agricultural use of 2,4-D by 2020, and this, Kimbrell stated, “will only spur the evolution of yet more herbicide-resistant weeds.”

Ronnie Cummins, international director of the Organic Consumers Association and its Mexico affiliate, Vía Orgánica, issued a similar warning, stating, “The USDA’s approval of these crops is proof that today’s destructive, industrial agriculture model, based on a system of genetically engineered mono-crops, is a failure.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“Farmers have been sold the lie that they can increase yields and prevent crop failure from weeds by buying Monsanto’s and Dow’s GMO seeds and dousing them in toxic poisons, also manufactured and sold by Monsanto and Dow,” Cummins continued. “But just as scientists predicted, these ‘miracle’ crops are evolving to resist the poisons thrown on them, causing the USDA and the EPA to approve increasingly toxic poisons to fight increasingly resistant weeds. Where does the escalation end?”

“We need a new direction for our agricultural system, not increased reliance on chemicals.” Kimbrell added.

The Center for Food Safety and the Pesicide Action Network added that their groups would pursue legal options to stop the crops’ threats to communities.

The Enlist Duo herbicide meant to be used in combination with the new crops is still waiting for approval from the EPA.  Despite widespread outcry, Dow said in a press statement that the approval “is expected in the near future.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019

Read More

The third edition of Josh Barnett’s Bloodsport emanates lives from Indianapolis, IN, Sunday night with the debut of AEW World Champion Jon Moxley headlining the show.

Originally scheduled to face Barnett at Bloodsport in April, the ardent MMA fan will face Chris Dickinson instead. Dickinson headlined the second show in a losing effort to Barnett. Unless there is a surprise, the show’s namesake will not be in action.

In another featured match, former MLW Champion and MMA fighter “Filthy” Tom Lawlor will look to pick up his first Bloodsport win when he faces the debuting Homicide. Lawlor has lost to Davey Boy Smith Jr. and WALTER at previous shows. 

Smith Jr. will also be in action and will look to go 3-0 when he faces The North’s Josh Alexander, making his Bloodsport debut.

The show will also feature regulars Simon Grimm vs. Matt Makowski, Calvin Tankman vs. Alexander James; Erik Hammer vs. Kal Jack, and a four woman tourney featuring Killer Kelly vs. Allysin Kay and Lindsay Snow vs. Leyla Hirsch.

Matches can only end in knockout or submission and are done in a ring with no ropes or turnbuckles.

The show begins at 8 PM Eastern.

**********

The show kicked off with the entire card being brought out one by one with Jon Moxley, clad in all black and wrestling shoes, and Homicide getting huge pops as you might expect. Barnett came out and did a quick speech before we got into the show.

For some reason, the ring announcer’s mic can only be heard through the camera mic which made it hard to hear what Barnett said. I’m not sure why indie shows can’t figure out how to patch that through.

Simon Grimm (1-2) def. Matt Makowski (2-1) by knockout

Grimm came into this looking for his first Bloodsport win (0-2) while Makowski was looking to go to 2-0 after knocking out Rory Gulak at the second event.

Overall, this was a very even match with both guys looking good. Makowski is a former MMA fighter while Grimm has been committed to this new style since he parted ways with WWE. It wasn’t much on flash but it did have substance.

This was a bit of a surprise ending as Grimm hit a half and half suplex that apparently briefly knocked out Makowski so the ref called it. Unfortunately, there was no replay. 

Women’s Tourney Semifinals: Allysin Kay (2-0) def. Killer Kelly (0-1) by submission

Kay knocked out Nicole Savoy in her first Bloodsport appearance while this was Kelly’s first match. This is only the third women’s match in Bloodsport history. 

These two had good intensity, especially Kelly who had an especially crazed look with her mouthpiece. Overall, this was a a really good match that went two minutes too long.

In one spot, Kelly snuck out the back door and had a rear naked choke on Kay that nearly saw hier submit, but Kay went straight back to try to escape and the two eventually wanted to go on the feet. They had plenty of striking exchanges throughout the match that also helped add to the intensity.

The end came when Kay essentially figure four’d Kelly’s head to get the submission, made even better by Kelly’s wide eyes as it was happening. Again, no replays which is disappointing.

I’m always curious what first time Bloodsport viewers think of this format since it’s so a change of pace. 

Women’s Tourney Semifinals: Lindsay Snow (1-1) def. Leyla Hirsch (0-1) by submission

This marked Hirsch’s debut as she’s an amateur wrestler fro Russia who has really made a name for herself on the indies in the last year while Snow was looking for her first win after losing to Sumie Sakai in the first ever women’s Bloodsport match.

This one ended surprisingly quickly. While Hirsch held her own for a while, Snow’s size was too much for Hirsch, ensnaring her in a heel hook for the tap following a Karelin lift. I would have loved to see a few minutes from Kay/Kelly get added to this one. That means Snow vs. Kay is set for the finals.

Calvin Tankman (1-0) def. Alexander James (0-1) by knockout

This was the Bloodsport debut for both men and the story was that Tankman went into this with no relevant experience while the wXw veteran James went into this with an advantage.

The match was meh, but the fans were really into Tankman from the start, especially as he got back into the match after James grounded him for so long. The end came when the two got into a striking battle and Tankman hit a right hand that knocked James down followed by some ground and pound for the stoppage. Given the reaction here, I’m looking forward to seeing how Tankman, who signed with MLW during the pandemic, will progress over the next year.

Erik Hammer (2-0) def. “Grizzly” Kal Jak (0-1) by submission

Hammer is the top student of Barnett so the story was the pressure was on him to perform here even though he went into this 1-0 in his Bloodsport career. This was the debut for Jak, the former NXT talent known as Cal Bishop.

Hammer, who looked like a light heavyweight version of Ox Baxer with a shaved head and fu manchu, was fundamentally sound throughout the bout with Jak staying in the game with big suplexes. Hammer submitted Jak with a double wristlock to end a perfectly fine match. 

“Filthy” Tom Lawlor (1-2) def. Homicide (0-1) by submission

Like Tankman, Homicide came into this with no formal training while Lawlor has a podcast on this website and has teamed with Bryan Alvarez. He went into this looking for his first win after losses to WALTER and Davey Boy Smith.

These two were into it early, flipping each other off, spitting, and slapping each other. Lawlor was landing a slew of elbows standing which eventually knocked Homicide on his ass. He attempted to finish him off with a sliding dropkick, but Homicide grapped his leg and turned it into an STO in a cool spot.

Homicide made a good accounting for himself, mixing in his street fighting style in a way that made sense. One such moment was when Homicide started stomping flush on Lawlor’s head which was almost a stoppage. Lawlor got fired up and locked in a front choke that almost submitted him before he hit an exploder suplex.

Homicide went for the Cop Killer, but Lawlor escaped, working into a seated half crab for the submission to end a really, really fun match. 

Lenny Leonard, flying solo on the announcing, is very good. This is a much better audio experience than the second show.

Davey Boy Smith Jr. (3-0) def. Josh Alexander (0-1) by knockout

Alexander, the former Impact Tag Team Champion with Ethan Page, was making his Bloodsport debut against DBS who was looking to remain undefeated at Bloodsport.

Smith always looks physically in shape and that was certainly the case here. He got Alexander in trouble twice at the edge of the mat, once in an armbar that Alexander was able to escape and later in a sharpshooter that got broken up.

The end came when Smith landed two really hard looking forearms to Alexander’s jaw that dropped him, followed by a stiff kick to the gut and a Liger Bomb for the knockout in a very quick match. Smith was dominant and surprisingly so. This was basically a squash.

Women’s Tourney Finals: Lindsay Snow (2-1) def. Allysin Kay (2-1) by submission

Not only do both women have distinct looks, but they are very skilled with this form of wrestling which added to the quality. Most of this was spent on the mat with varying holds and very few strikes. Like a lot of the matches, the end came quickly as Snow got Kay in a heel hook for the quick tap, the tourney win, and Kay’s first Bloodsport loss. I could see them running this back at the next show as a Bloodsport rivalry of sorts. This was fine, but I would have liked to see it go a few more minutes with at least one good striking exchange.

Jon Moxley (1-0) def. Chris Dickinson (1-3) by submission

This was Moxley’s first Bloodsport appearance after he was supposed to fight Barnett at the canceled Bloodsport show in April. As expected, Moxley didn’t come out with the AEW belt and came out to Hole’s “Violet”. Dickinson went into this at 1-2 with losses to Dan Severn and Barnett and a win over “The Butcher” Andy Williams.

The announcer put over how Dickinson was supposed to have a ton of big matches in April but the pandemic ruined it. However, with a win here tonight over a champion in two of the biggest wrestling companies in the world, he could write his own ticket.

This was pretty competitive throughout. In one of the bigger spots of the night, Moxley pushed Dickinson into the ring post but since there were no ring ropes, he fell all the way to the floor, giving him a brief edge. Later, he did a sliding shoulderblock to knock Dickinson outside the rig once again.

I realized halfway through the match that Moxley is wrestling live in a few days on the Dynamite show, adding to the physical risk of taking this book so close to AEW’s anniversary show.

Dickinson regained control with a dragon screw legwhip and when after Moxley’s left leg with kicks and a deadlift German suplex. The two did a great exchanged of forearms strikes, chops and a Moxley headbutt, but Dickinson roared back with two belly to back suplexes and a high kick that looked to knock the champion out. Dickinson landed some ground and pound and went for an armbar, but Moxley fought out. 

Moxley got a front facelock into a double arm suplex, transitioning from a rear naked choke into the bulldog choke for the submission to end a very good and entertaining match.

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

Afterward, Moxley did a promo that was hard to understand because of the aforementioned microphone issue. He put over Dickinson, the other talents in the back, indie wrestling, and the fans in attendance. 

Final Thoughts:

This was a very well-paced and entertaining show at two hours and fifteen minutes, the best of the Bloodsport events I have seen. The Lawlor-Homicide match was my favorite, followed by Moxley-Dickinson. This style is hard to do a lot of matches with as there’s often not enough variance to make each match feel different. They largely succeeded tonight with a very good show.

Read More

The backing of so-called “moderate” rebels is a stated cornerstone of Obama’s expanding air bombardments on Syria, and Congress last month cleared the path for aiding, arming, and training armed groups in Syria, which have yet to be fully identified to the U.S. public. But as the expanding U.S.-led war on that country enters its second week, and the war on Iraq enters its eighth, analysts warn that U.S. military entanglement is built around myths and falsehoods regarding who these armed groups are, what support they can actually offer, and what they want.

“The proposition that there is a moderate Syrian opposition with enough military potential and—even more importantly—popular support inside Syria to overthrow the Assad government is a myth,” write Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett for Consortium News. “To claim in addition that these mythical moderate oppositionists can take on and defeat the Islamic State is either blatantly dishonest or dangerously delusional.”

Similar skepticism can be found across the political spectrum, including hawkish national security columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in the Washington Post, “The problem is that the ‘moderate opposition’ that the United States is backing is still largely a fantasy.”

Experts charge that Obama is deluded to think that the rebels back U.S. interests. Reese Erlich writes:

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Furthermore, it is not clear that leaders of the Syrian armed groups the U.S. points to as its closest allies even back the expanding U.S. war. Foreign Policy writer David Kenner writes:

Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina

The criticism of a strategy which relies on “moderate” rebels is just one of several deep concerns shared by analysts. Phyllis Bennis warns that, ultimately, there is no military solution to the rapid spread of ISIS. She writes:

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

The worst Ebola outbreak in recorded history has now infected 10,000 people, killing nearly 50 percent of them, the World Health Organization revealed on Saturday.

The number of “confirmed, probable and suspected cases” has reached 10,141, with 4,922 reported deaths, stated the W.H.O., which is tasked by the United Nations with directing the international responses to epidemics. Approximately 200 new cases are noted by the organization since its last report four days ago.

The west African countries of Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone are by far hardest hit, accounting for all but 10 deaths and 27 infections. In addition to these nations, Mali, Spain, and the United States are listed as “affected countries,” while Nigeria and Senegal are described as “previously affected countries.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Four hundred fifty health care workers are known to have contracted the disease, the vast majority of them in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. In total, 224 health care workers have died from the virus, the report states.

However, these statistics likely under-count infections and deaths, because the outbreak has proven difficult to track in the most affected countries, due to poor medical treatment and testing services, as well as reluctance or inability of people to seek care.

Voices from west Africa to the United States have warned that austerity and “structural adjustment” programs have left medical systems ill-equipped to deal with the public health crisis.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: los jaguares argentina

Read More

More than a dozen clinics that provide abortions in the state of Texas should be able to reopen their doors on Wednesday, following an unsigned order by the U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday that puts on hold a lower court ruling that shuttered them.

The order from the high court, approved by a 6-3 margin, comes as a reprieve to women and reproductive rights advocates in the state who have been fighting to nullify a law passed by the legislature last year which has led to the closure of all but eight abortion clinics in the nation’s second most populous state.

Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which has been fighting the law said the order was most welcome but that the overall fight for women’s freedoms in Texas was far from over.

“The U.S. Supreme Court gave Texas women a tremendous victory today,” said Northrup in a statement following the court’s decision. “[On Wednesday], thirteen clinics across the state will be allowed to reopen and provide women with safe and legal abortion care in their own communities.”

However, she continued, “This fight against Texas’ sham abortion law is not over. HB2 was designed to gut the constitutional protections of Roe v. Wade and half of the state’s clinics remain closed. We will continue this legal battle until the rights of Texas women are restored.”

According to the Washington Post:

Click Here: cheap sydney roosters jersey

 

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

The Food and Drug Administration is carrying out little testing for pesticide residues on fruit and vegetables, a new report by a federal watchdog reveals.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) report (pdf) found that in 2012, the FDA tested less than one-tenth of 1 percent of imported shipments.

FDA does not test for some commonly used pesticides—like glyphosate—for which the EPA has established tolerance levels, nor does FDA disclose in its annual reports that it doesn’t do this testing, the GAO analysis states.

In addition, GAO charges, “FDA does not use statistically valid methods consistent with Office of Management and Budget standards to collect national information on the incidence and level of pesticide residues.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit conservation organization, says the report shows that inadequate safeguards are in place and urged the FDA to take appropriate action.

“The FDA is supposed to be protecting the American people from dangers in their food and it’s clear they’ve dropped the ball when it comes to pesticides,” Lori Ann Burd, endangered species campaign director for the organization, said in a statement.

“As scientists continue to uncover information regarding the harmful effects of pesticides on human health and the environment, the American public deserves to be able to rely on FDA to provide the basic monitoring required to protect the health of people, wildlife and our waterways,” Burd added.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Head rompers

Read More

Trump ahead of Obama by 1 in hypothetical matchup

October 12, 2020 | News | No Comments

Click:Diesel Engine diagnostic tool

Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE leads Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaHarris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Five ways America would take a hard left under Joe Biden Valerie Jarrett: ‘Democracy depends upon having law enforcement’ MORE by one point in a hypothetical face-off between the current president and next president, according to a new poll released Wednesday.

Forty-five percent of respondents said they’d pick Trump to be president over Obama, while 44 percent said they’d prefer a third term for the current president, the Morning Consult/Politico poll found.

ADVERTISEMENT

Late last month, Obama told a CNN podcast that a message of optimism, like his in 2008, could have defeated Trump’s more divisive brand of populism. 

Trump responded with a tweet saying “NO WAY” would Obama have beaten him.

Even though the poll showed Trump slightly ahead, more respondents thought Obama would win a hypothetical matchup with Trump. Forty-seven percent said Obama would win, while 42 percent said Trump would.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

The poll was conducted from Dec. 28 to 29, surveying 2,000 registered voters. It has a margin of error of 2 percentage points.

The Pentagon has failed to adequately treat—or even track—over 600 U.S. service members who report that they were exposed to degraded chemical weapons agents while they were deployed to Iraq after the 2003 invasion, the New York Times revealed Friday.

The report—which references long-documented chemical arms stockpiles developed by Saddam Hussein’s government during the 1980s in collaboration with the United States and other western states—reveals that, in addition to Iraqi and Iranian civilians, U.S. service members have likely been placed in harm’s way with little recourse.

The chemical weapons stockpiles referenced in the article are not the same as the non-existent “weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)” former President George W. Bush used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, of which Bush and top aides told nearly one-thousand documented lies.

The Times article is a follow-up to a previous investigation, published in October, which disclosed 17 cases of service members’ injuries due to contact with sarin or a sulfur mustard agent and revealed that the U.S. military had suppressed information about the exposure. Since the October investigation, hundreds of service members have reported to the military that they believe they were exposed, according to a review of Pentagon data ordered by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the Times reported Friday.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The chemical weapons were supplied to Iraq during the 1980s—a time when the U.S. and other western nations backed Saddam Hussein’s program to develop Iraq’s chemical arms program to aid in the war with Iran. As Murtaza Hussain points out in The Intercept, the United States has long been aware of the degraded arms’ existence and location.

The Times report does not investigate the vast impact of these chemical weapons on Iraqi or Iranian civilians or combatants, which includes at least 50,000 Iranian casualties and lingering public health impacts.

Furthermore, it does not address direct use of toxic weapons by the U.S. in Iraq, including depleted uranium in the 1991 Gulf War and chemical weapon white phosphorous used in the 2004 U.S. attack on Fallujah. Iraqi civil society organizations have repeatedly warned of the dangers presented to local populations by U.S. weapons, including high rates of cancer and birth defects.

Meanwhile, analysts warn that hawkish forces are seizing on the Times’ new reporting of the chemical weapons to retroactively justify the 2003 invasion. “The fact that people thoroughly invested in supporting the war apparently had no idea about this is in many ways emblematic of their complete cluelessness about the country which they helped destroy,” wrote Murtaza Hussain.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: Cardiff Blues Store

Read More

In an age of expanding national security powers, increasing surveillance state, and rolled-back civil liberties protections, Americans’ perception of their own personal freedoms is plummeting, according to the annual ranking by the Legatum Institute in London.

In Washington D.C. this week to promote their findings, researchers with the Legatum Institute measure a nation’s prosperity on a number of factors including health, safety, education, economy, opportunity, social capital, governance and personal freedoms.

According to the 2014 Index (pdf) released earlier this month, in the measure of personal freedom, the United States has fallen from 9th place in 2010 to 21st worldwide—behind such countries as Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Uruguay and Costa Rica.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The scores are based on 2013 polling data provided by Gallup, which questioned citizens’ satisfaction with the nation’s handling of civil liberties, freedom of choice, tolerance of ethnic minorities, and tolerance of immigrants.

According to the Legatum researchers, “evidence suggests that the greater the level of freedom in society the greater the satisfaction with life.” However, they note that of the types of freedom tested for, “economic freedom is most important for life satisfaction and wellbeing across a range of countries.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

Read More