October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A federal judge has ordered that former CIA officials can be deposed in a lawsuit against the architects of the agency’s torture program, in what human rights advocates say is a vital step for accountability.
The order (pdf), issued by U.S. District Court Senior Judge Justin Quackenbush earlier this week, rejected an attempt by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that would have protected the officials from oral questioning. The deposition will be carried out as part of a discovery process for a case against the program’s architects, psychologists James Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of three men who were subjected to beatings, exposure to extreme temperature, sleep and food deprivation, and other abuses while in CIA custody.
Two of the four officials are John Rizzo and Jose Rodriguez, who both held high-ranking positions in the agency at the time the torture program was being developed and implemented. In a blog post about the order, the ACLU wrote of Rizzo, who was the CIA’s chief lawyer for much of George W. Bush’s administration:
Rodriguez has also defended the CIA’s torture of detainees and, while at the agency, authorized the use of certain tactics. He also ordered the destruction of scores of videotapes showing waterboarding and other torture.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“This ruling is a critical step towards accountability, and it charts a way forward for torture victims to get their day in court,” said ACLU staff attorney Dror Ladin. “For years, claims of secrecy shut the courthouse doors to survivors, but the systematic abuse of prisoners can’t be swept under the rug forever. This order affirms that our judicial system can handle claims of CIA torture, including when those claims involve high-level government officials.”
Two of the plaintiffs, Suleiman Abdullah Salim and Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud, survived but continue to struggle physically and psychologically, the ACLU said. The third man, Gul Rahman, died of hypothermia in a secret CIA prison.
In a hearing last week, DOJ attorney Andrew Warden said, “It is, frankly, unprecedented…for the nation’s top spy, the head of the National Clandestine Service to be deposed on operational information by a private party. I don’t think that’s ever happened in the history of this country.”
The lawsuit against Mitchell and Jessen was filed in Washington state, where their law firm was based and where Jessen lives to this day. Although the ACLU says the depositions may help provide additional information about the program, the rights organization says the evidence they need to win the case has already been made public through reports like the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s executive summary of its torture investigation.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: cheap sydney roosters jersey
October 2, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Voters in U.S. counties previously covered by the Voting Rights Act (VRA) will have at least 868 fewer places to cast ballots in the 2016 election than they did previously, according to a new analysis released Friday.
In fact, the report (pdf) from the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights finds that in the wake of the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision gutting the VRA, “[c]ounties and states with known records of voting discrimination are closing polling places on a massive scale.” This is among other negative outcomes of the ruling, which Common Dreams has covered extensively.
Many closures happened in places that would have had to gain federal approval to change voting laws prior to the high court’s ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, “which made Section 5 of the VRA inoperable and opened the door to racial discrimination at every juncture of the electoral process,” as the report explains.
Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey
In North Carolina, for example:
And in Texas:
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
While the Leadership Conference acknowledges that “[t]here are justifiable reasons to reduce polling places and consolidations can be executed equitably,” it also points out that “the loss of Section 5 means that there is no process to ensure that reductions are disclosed to the public, are conducted with the input of impacted communities, and do not discriminate against voters of color.”
Indeed, the analysis notes that “[p]olling place closures are a particularly common and pernicious tactic for disenfranchising voters of color. Decisions to shutter or reduce voting locations are often made quietly and at the last minute, making pre-election intervention or litigation virtually impossible. These changes can place an undue burden on minority voters, who may be less likely to have access to public transportation or vehicles, given continuing disparities in socioeconomic resources.”
As Ari Berman writes for The Nation:
With four days to go until the election, the Leadership Conference is urging people to check their polling place locations with the following tools:
- Rock the Vote’s Polling Place Finder
- League of Women Voters’ Vote411.org
- Election Protection Hotline: 866.OUR.VOTE
But in the longer term, the organization is calling on Congress to pass one of two pending bills to restore the VRA. Both pieces of legislation would restore transparency and notice requirements for certain voting changes like polling place closures. “And both include an updated formula for determining which states and counties should have their voting changes—including their proposed polling place reductions and consolidation—subject to federal oversight to ensure they are not racially discriminatory,” the Leadership Conference writes.
However, it concludes: “Congress has yet to advance either bill.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A Republican super PAC with ties to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote GOP senator to try to reverse requirement that Pentagon remove Confederate names from bases No, ‘blue states’ do not bail out ‘red states’ MORE (R-Ky.) on Tuesday took a shot at former Arizona state Sen. Kelli Ward (R), arguing that she will not be the Republican nominee in the wake of Sen. Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeGOP lawmakers stick to Trump amid new criticism Kelly holds double-digit lead over McSally in Arizona: poll Trump asserts his power over Republicans MORE’s (R-Ariz.) decision to not run for reelection.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF) has been critical of Ward, who had launched a primary challenge to the right of Flake and has the backing of pro-Trump outside group Great America Alliance. Flake sent shockwaves throughout the political world when he announced on Tuesday that he wouldn’t run for a second term in 2018.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Sen. Jeff Flake will be remembered for a distinguished and impactful career in Congress, as well as his independent streak and genial manner,” Senate Leadership Fund president Steven Law said in a statement.
“The one political upshot of Sen. Flake’s decision today is that Steve Bannon’s hand-picked candidate, conspiracy-theorist Kelli Ward, will not be the Republican nominee for this Senate seat in 2018.”
Flake’s departure will likely open up the Republican field and now leaves a spot open for a candidate as an alternative to Ward.
Former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon, who had declared “war” against the GOP establishment, recently endorsed and campaigned with Ward in Arizona.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), the committee tasked with maintaining the party’s majority, also sent out a statement about Flake’s retirement, but didn’t mention Ward and only argued that the seat will remain red next year.
“While we are sad to see Senator Flake retire, we know that Arizona will stay in Republican hands after the upcoming election,” NRSC chairman Cory GardnerCory Scott GardnerSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Interior faces legal scrutiny for keeping controversial acting leaders in office | White House faces suit on order lifting endangered species protections | Lawmakers seek investigation of Park Police after clearing of protesters The Hill’s Campaign Report: Republicans go on attack over calls to ‘defund the police’ MORE (R-Colo.) said in a statement.
Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A GOP lawmaker is calling for the Senate to refuse to swear in Roy Moore (R) if the Alabama Senate candidate defeats Doug Jones (D) in a December special election.
Rep. Adam KinzingerAdam Daniel KinzingerRepublicans walk tightrope on police reform The Hill’s Coronavirus Report: National Portrait Gallery’s Kim Sajet says this era rewiring people’s relationship with culture, art; Trump’s war with Twitter heats up Cheney says Trump should stop tweeting Scarborough conspiracy MORE (R-Ill.) told CNN on Friday that he believes the allegations reported against Moore are true. The Washington Post this week reported allegations that Moore initiated sexual contact with a 14-year-old girl decades ago while serving as an assistant district attorney.
“I think Roy Moore needs to step aside now, these allegations are disgusting and I believe them,” Kinzinger said. “There’s no way to defend this. And second, I think the Senate should say that they will refuse to seat him, or in fact expel him if he is the senator from Alabama.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Kinzinger continued, saying that the accusations leveled against Moore go beyond voters’ right to pick their own senator.
“Look, Alabama has the right to pick their senators, but this is beyond the pale, to have this kind of contact with somebody when they were 14 years old,” he said. “I don’t care how long ago it was, he was an adult and there could be more information coming forward, who knows.”
“But this is a bridge too far,” he added. “And the Republican Party should disown every aspect of him.”
Moore has denied the allegations, calling them a joint effort from Jones’s campaign and The Washington Post to derail his Senate race when he was ahead in the polls.
Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks
“I believe they are politically motivated. I believe they are brought only to stop a very successful campaign, and that’s what they are doing. I’ve never known this woman,” Moore said on Sean Hannity’s radio show on Friday.
Two GOP senators pulled their endorsements from Moore’s campaign on Friday as pressure mounted from the allegations uncovered by the Post.
“Having read the detailed description of the incidents, as well as the response from Judge Moore and his campaign, I can no longer endorse his candidacy for the US Senate,” Sen. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Senate headed for late night vote amid standoff over lands bill Hillicon Valley: Facebook employees speak up against content decisions | Trump’s social media executive order on weak legal ground | Order divides conservatives MORE (R-Utah) said in a statement.
“I am pulling my endorsement and support for Roy Moore for U.S. Senate,” Sen. Steve DainesSteven (Steve) David DainesSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Koch-backed group launches ad campaign to support four vulnerable GOP senators OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Interior faces legal scrutiny for keeping controversial acting leaders in office | White House faces suit on order lifting endangered species protections | Lawmakers seek investigation of Park Police after clearing of protesters MORE (R-Mont.) tweeted.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
If it seems like Big Pharma has escaped accountability for its role in perpetuating the nation’s deadly opioid epidemic, those suspicions are not unfounded.
According to a former top Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) official, the industry’s influence over Congress has successfully quashed efforts to regulate the pharmaceutical drug market aiding an unprecedented addiction to legal drugs.
“When you sit with a parent who can’t understand why there’s so many pharmaceuticals out in the illicit marketplace, and why isn’t the government doing anything, well the DEA was doing something. Unfortunately what we’re trying to do is thwarted by people who are writing laws,” Joseph Rannazzisi, who for 10 years served as head of the DEA’s Diversion Control Division, told the Guardian.
In an exclusive investigation published on Monday, the Guardian, with Rannazzisi’s help, explains how Congress turned its back on suffering families and, under the guise of combating the national epidemic, has routinely passed legislation that effectively shields the industry.
One such law is the recently-passed Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act, which “requires the DEA to warn pharmacies and distributors if they are in breach of regulations”—namely “crooked doctors and pharmacists” in suspicion of over-prescribing prescription drugs—”and to give them a chance to comply before licenses are withdrawn,” the Guardian reports.
Rannazzisi declared the new law a “gift to the industry,” explaining how it does neither of the things it purports to do. “This doesn’t ensure patient access and it doesn’t help drug enforcement at all,” he said. “What this bill does is take away DEA’s ability to go after a pharmacist, a wholesaler, manufacturer or distributor.”
“The bill passed because ‘Big Pharma’ wanted it to pass,” he added. “When I was in charge what I tried to do was explain to my investigators and my agents that our job was to regulate the industry and they’re not going to like being regulated.”
The Washington Post has also been reporting on the drop in enforcement actions against pharmaceutical distributors, dubbed “pill mills,” which it said was due in part to “resistance from higher-level Justice Department officials who were being heavily lobbied by the wholesalers.”
“Congress would rather listen to people who had a profit motive rather than a public health and safety motive.”
Click Here: essendon bombers guernsey 2019—Joseph Rannazzisi
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Indeed, as the Guardian points out, the industry “has spent hundreds of millions of dollars in lobbying to stave off measures to reduce prescriptions and therefore sales of opioid painkillers.”
The Guardian continues:
Both Hatch and Rogers were reportedly “instrumental in legislation establishing a panel to examine treatment of pain that critics said had close ties to industry-funded groups.”
The problem of industry-influenced “pain management” panels was also highlighted earlier this year by Intercept reporter Lee Fang, who uncovered Big Pharma’s attempt to influence recently reissued guidelines from Centers for Disease Control (CDC) on opioid prescriptions.
One lawmaker who has been a vocal critical of this industry collusion is Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who said, “There is no question that the powerful opioid manufacturers have a disproportionate voice, a disproportionate amount of influence, in these debates.”
“Congress would rather listen to people who had a profit motive rather than a public health and safety motive,” said Rannazzisi. “As long as the industry has this stranglehold through lobbyists, nothing’s going to change.”
According to (pdf) the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “[s]ince 1999, the rate of overdose deaths involving opioids—including prescription opioid pain relievers and heroin—nearly quadrupled,” as over 165,000 people have died from prescription opioid overdoses.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A prominent Honduran leader of a rural land rights movement was killed on Monday night in what supporters claim was an assassination organized by wealthy landowners.
“How many more activists have to be brutally murdered before the authorities take effective action to protect them, or even be willing to talk about this crisis?”
—Erika Guevara-Rosas,
Amnesty InternationalJose Angel Flores, president of the Unified Campesinos Movement of the Aguan Valley, or MUCA, had been under police protection since March, teleSUR reported, after the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights ordered the Honduran state to protect him from death threats in 2014.
Former MUCA president Johnny Rivas, who hosts a radio show on the local station Radio Progreso, blamed “death squads chasing peasant families fighting for land rights” for the murder.
Of Flores’ organization, teleSUR wrote: “MUCA has been on the forefront of alternative food production and economic development projects in the Aguan on land recovered through large-scale land occupations. The movement struggles to strengthen food sovereignty while continuing to demand comprehensive agrarian reform.”
“The situation in the Aguan has been called the most intense agrarian conflict seen in Central America in the last 15 years,” the Latin American outlet added.
Flores was killed in Tocoa, in the northern Honduran department of Colon.
Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019
The Spanish-language wire service EPE reported on the details of the attack:
About 150 other activists have been killed so far in the region, the local campesinos organizations told teleSUR.
The battle between landowners and peasant farmers has led to so much bloodshed that people describe Bajo Aguan, where MUCA operates, as “killing fields.”
“Many illegal mass graves have been discovered in recent years,” teleSUR wrote.
Honduran Indigenous activist Berta Cáceres, who was assassinated in March, also devoted her life to fighting for land rights. Violence against land defenders is on the rise across Latin America, and Honduras remains one of the most dangerous countries for activists in the world.
“Honduras has turned into a ‘no-go zone’ for anyone daring to campaign for the protection of the environment. How many more activists have to be brutally murdered before the authorities take effective action to protect them, or even be willing to talk about this crisis?” said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director at Amnesty International.
And the U.S. continues to funnel millions of dollars in military funding to the Honduran government, despite the targeted assassinations and other human rights abuses.
“We are indignant that in the face of the ongoing and documented violence, repression and corruption involving the Honduran government, the U.S. State Department has certified that it is satisfied that the Honduran government has taken effective steps to improve human rights,” grassroots coalition Honduras Solidarity Network said Wednesday. “This clears the way for $55 million more in U.S. aid.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A combination of being the day after a pay-per-view and bringing back Ric Flair, Shawn Michaels, Big Show, and Christian allowed Raw to have a huge increase this week against the toughest competition in a long time.
Raw averaged 1.82 million viewers on the USA Network last night. In the 18-49 demo, the show did a 0.55 rating. Both numbers are up 10 percent from last week on a night where many going in expected the lowest ratings in the history of the show due to the competition.
And the competition was there. The Kansas City Chiefs vs. Baltimore Ravens NFL game did 14.02 million viewers and 4.60 in 18-49. The final game of the Stanley Cup finals series where the Tampa Bay Lightning beat the Dallas Stars did 2.88 million viewers and 0.8 in 18-49, which aired on NBC.
In addition, news shows were way up with Tucker Carlson doing 5.02 million viewers against the first hour of Raw, which was the highest hour.
The key was the big first hour of Raw, as there was a 14 percent first-to-third hour drop, larger than the show has been doing of late.
Raw was 28th for the night overall on cable, but only lost to football and SportsCenter on ESPN, and news shows on Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN, beating all entertainment shows in both total viewers and in 18-49.
Raw was fourth behind ESPN shows in males 18-49 on cable, fifth behind ESPN shows in 18-34, sixth in women 18-49, fifth in males 12-34, and fifth in women 12-34.
However, the year-to-year drops remain large. Raw was down 29 percent in viewers from the same week last year, down 38 percent in 18-49, and down 44 percent in 18-34.
As far as losses during the show, the women 18-49 drop was 15 percent from hour one to three, males 18-49 fell seven percent, teenage girls dropped 27 percent and teenage boys increased seven percent, while over 50, the largest audience, was down 15 percent.
The three hours were:
8 p.m. 1.96 million viewers
9 p.m. 1.82 million viewers
10 p.m. 1.69 million viewers
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Security experts on Monday testified in support of Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein, who is spearheading a by-hand election recount initiative in Wisconsin.
Unless a judge rules in her favor, the state will likely allow its 72 counties to decide whether they want to conduct the process manually or by machine. On Monday, a group of academics and other specialists agreed with Stein’s argument that an automated recount would risk an incorrect tally. President-elect Donald Trump won Wisconsin 47.9 percent to Democratic rival Hillary Clinton’s 46.9 percent—a margin of just over 22,000 votes.
A manual count would be the only way to ensure that there had been no hacking, the experts said.
“It is not possible to determine with certainty the absence of malicious software hiding within what might appear to be many thousands of lines of legitimate software code,” Poorvi Vora, a professor at George Washington University, wrote in an affidavit (pdf) on Monday.
In another affidavit, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) professor Ronald Rivest quoted (pdf) the famous proverb, “Trust, but verify.”
“We have learned the hard way that almost any computer system can be broken into by a sufficiently determined, skillful, and persistent adversary,” he said.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
And professor Philip Stark of the University of California at Berkeley noted (pdf) that Wisconsin should not rule out simple software problems with the ballot scanning machines.
“The amount of error required to alter the outcome can easily be less than the error that an optical scan system makes in inferring and tabulating voter intent from the ballots or other paper record,” he wrote. “For instance, the software may miss a light or incomplete mark, interpreting it as an undervote, whereas a human being inspecting the paper record would see the voter’s intent clearly.”
Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store
“To determine whether the reported winner actually won requires verifying the results as accurately as possible, which in turn requires manually examining the underlying paper records,” he said.
Stein is also pushing for election recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania. Although the deadline to request a per-precinct recount reportedly passed on November 21, Stein’s campaign sued Pennsylvania on Monday to initiate a statewide recount. The campaign will also request a manual recount in Michigan on Wednesday, the last day to do so. Michigan certified Trump as its winner on Monday.
By Monday, Stein had raised nearly $7 million for the effort—although she tweeted on Tuesday that Wisconsin would charge $3.5 million for a recount, “an outrageous increase from the initial estimate of $1.1M.”
“Americans deserve a voting system we can trust,” Stein said. “After a presidential election tarnished by the use of outdated and unreliable machines and accusations of irregularities and hacks, people of all political persuasions are asking if our election results are reliable. We must recount the votes so we can build trust in our election system. We need to verify the vote in this and every election so that Americans of all parties can be sure we have a fair, secure, and accurate voting system.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Buried amid the outcry over the white-nationalist beliefs of Steve Bannon, President-elect Donald Trump’s selection for chief strategist, is the scale of his global ambitions as sources close to the Brietbart News chairman predict he will use his influence to craft a foreign policy that includes “aggressive military action” and bolstering international far-right leaders, beginning with France’s Marine Le Pen.
Speaking with sources close to Bannon, The Hill reported Tuesday that he is expected to “be an influential adviser to Trump in the international arena.”
“Bannon admires right-wing nationalists and hard-line illegal immigration opponents in Europe and elsewhere,” The Hill reports. “He wants to work more closely with them and sees them as part of a worldwide movement to overthrow the ‘globalists,’ according to multiple sources familiar with his thinking.”
In fact, Breitbart is planning to open offices in France and Germany specifically in preparation for upcoming elections in those countries, Breitbart editor Andrew Marlow told the New York Times.
A source “familiar with the website’s internal dynamics” told The Hill that the new Paris bureau, “will campaign aggressively” on behalf of Le Pen, leader of France’s far-right National Front party.
Meanwhile, Bannon’s strong opposition to Chancellor Angela Merkel will be a source of inspiration for the German branch. According to a “source familiar with Breitbart’s internal dynamics,” Breitbart Berlin will focus “on the Islamic refugee crisis that Merkel created.”
Former Breitbart writer Ben Shapiro minced no words Monday when he declared: “Bannon has goals.”
One of those goals, he wrote, is “maximization of personal power,” which in large part will be used to “target enemies.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“But more importantly,” Shapiro said, “Bannon’s interested in turning the Republican Party into a far-right European party.”
Citing the Daily Beast report that Bannon has reached out to Le Pen to form a “global ultra-right coalition,” Shapiro notes that “[o]ver the weekend Le Pen met with Nigel Farage of the U.K. Independent Party. And Trump met with Farage shortly after being elected.”
“Bannon has always wanted to burn down the GOP. That’s still his goal. He wants it replaced with an American National Front party in fact if not in name,” Shapiro wrote.
Bannon is also expected to focus “on an America-first foreign policy, taking care of America’s interests in whatever negotiation the country is engaged in,” one source told The Hill, which added:
Meanwhile, Bannon’s appointment has roiled everyone from national civil rights groups, progressive Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and the New York Times editorial board, to mainstream conservatives—including Glenn Beck.
“One of the most dangerous trends in America today is the blurring of lines between fact and fiction, between propaganda and news. Bannon has stood at the vanguard of that pernicious trend and he found his vehicle in Donald Trump,” Frida Ghitis, world affairs columnist for The Miami Herald, wrote Monday.
“We can expect that the White House itself will become the source of disinformation, of lies and distortion, backed by propaganda sites such as Breitbart and others posing as news organizations, trying to shape the narrative of what Americans receive as news,” Ghitis continued, “trying to create a new reality to suit their political ends.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina
October 1, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Marking the divestment movement’s “undeniable success,” a new report shows the value of funds controlled by individuals and institutions who have vowed to dump their fossil fuels assets now surpasses $5 trillion.
350.org co-founder Bill McKibben said the “news is mammoth.”
The report (pdf) by Arabella Advisors for the Divest-Invest Network shows that the value of global funds making the commitment—now at about $5.2 trillion—has doubled in size since September 2015, and comes from 688 institutions and over 58,000 individuals spanning 76 countries.
It comes exactly one year after the adoption of the landmark Paris climate accord, and that agreement, the report says, “bolstered the economic arguments underpinning divestment, validating it as a key tool for achieving the agreements goals.”
Pointing to the election of climate science-denier Donald Trump, the report adds: “Any setback to official U.S. climate policy elevates the importance of divestment as an organizing and financial tool to speed the clean energy transition. Absent effective federal policy to curb emissions, advocates and investors can use their assets and their voice to continue pushing the energy sector beyond fossil fuels.”
Outgoing United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the findings, stating that “it’s clear the transition to a clean energy future is inevitable, beneficial, and well underway, and that investors have a key role to play.”
May Boeve, 350.org executive director, declared: “In the face of intensifying climate impacts, and regressive and anti-climate governments like the Trump administration, it’s more critical than ever that our institutions—especially at the local level—step up to break free from fossil fuel companies.”
The growing calls to divest, already underscored by the threats of a “carbon bubble,” come as what may likely be the hottest year on record draws to a close.
The new report also comes as the American Museum of Natural History in New York City tells (pdf) climate campaigners it too has joined other science and natural history museums in cutting ties with the polluting industry. “We hope we can achieve our collective goal of global sustainability while maximizing the resources each of our institutions brings to bear on this vital issue,” Daniel Stoddard, the museum’s chief investment officer, wrote.
Beka Economopoulos of The Natural History Museum, a mobile and pop-up museum calling for climate action, said she hopes the development “encourages other science museums to stand up for science and cut ties to fossil fuels.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.