Attention à ne pas gâcher la fête. C’est le message adressé par la préfecture de police de Paris, lundi 31 décembre, à tous ceux qui souhaiteraient utiliser des pétards pour passer la nouvelle année. La préfecture rappelle que la loi prévoit une peine de deux ans d’emprisonnement et de 30 000 euros d’amende si d’autres personnes sont blessées.
⚠️ Pétards et mortiers = danger Évitez les risques et ne gâchez pas votre #reveillon2019 ! pic.twitter.com/XXO87n5jWL — Préfecture de police (@prefpolice) 31 décembre 2018
Les autorités assurent également qu’en moyenne, 55 personnes sont grièvement blessées chaque année à la main à cause de pétards. “Les séquelles peuvent être graves et handicapantes à vie. On parle d’amputation de doigts, de lésions terribles sur les nerfs, les vaisseaux”, insiste dans Le Parisien le professeur Levon Doursounian, ancien chef du service SOS Mains de l’hôpital parisien Saint-Antoine.De nombreuses préfectures prennent d’ailleurs des arrêtés pour interdire l’usage de pétards sur la voie publique le soir du Nouvel An. C’est le cas notamment dans le Nord, le Pas-de-Calais ou le Calvados.Click Here: pinko shop cheap
Depuis la diffusion des images sur les réseaux sociaux le 2 janvier 2019, l’amour entre deux jeunes étudiants s’est transformé en une affaire publique en Egypte. Sur la vidéo devenue virale, on voit un homme d’une vingtaine d’année s’agenouiller, un bouquet de roses à la main, devant une jeune fille. Ils se regardent, se sautent au cou et s’enlacent devant des jeunes de leur âge qui semblent complices.Une proposition indécente ? Proposition de mariage ou surprise d’anniversaire ? Les médias égyptiens hésitent entre ces deux versions. Quoi qu’il en soit, cette scène romantique a suscité un tollé. Dans une société conservatrice comme l’Egypte, on ne s’étreint pas en public et encore moins quand on est l’étudiant d’une université islamique. Suite à la propagation de la vidéo, le Conseil de discipline de l’université Al-Azhar a décidé d’exclure la jeune femme.L’intervention du grand imamLe jeune homme, étudiant dans une autre université, a été également rappelé à l’ordre quelques jours plus tard. Accusé de “contrevenir aux règles et aux valeurs de l’université et de la société”, il a été exclu deux ans de l’établissement. “Je savais qu’on nous filmait, mais je ne pensais pas que ça allait nous causer des ennuis”, a déclaré Mahmoud à Egypt Today.L’affaire “de l’étreinte”, comme on l’appelle en Egypte, a pris une telle ampleur que le grand imam d’Al-Azhar Ahmed el-Tayeb, principale autorité religieuse sunnite d’Egypte, est intervenu en personne pour demander la clémence pour la jeune fille. Il a toutefois souligné que son comportement était “contraire aux traditions religieuses et orientales”.Des “scandales” de mœursLa sanction a donc été retirée, mais la jeune étudiante ne pourra pas passer les examens du premier semestre. Le jeune homme est, quant à lui toujours exclu pour deux ans, mais il peut faire appel.L’Egypte est régulièrement secouée par ce qui est perçu comme des scandales, largement relayés par les réseaux sociaux. Ainsi, plusieurs personnes accusées d’homosexualité ou de diffusion d’images impudiques voire de “débauche” sont poursuivies pour “atteinte aux bonnes mœurs”.
Country’s ambassador to the EU says dealing with the debt crisis will be a priority.
Putting in place tougher economic governance rules and dealing with the debt crisis will be top priorities for Hungary when it takes over the rotating presidency of the Council of Ministers in January, the country’s ambassador to the EU said today.
Péter Györkös, speaking in Brussels this morning, said “the number one issue” during his country’s six-month presidency will be “how to exit the crisis”.
He acknowledged that the debt crisis and political wrangling between member states and the European Parliament over the EU’s 2011 budget had complicated preparations for his country’s presidency.
“It has taken a long time to structure our presidency programme,” Györkös said during a meeting on his country’s EU presidency. “If somebody…can tell me what the EU will look like on 1 January 2011, I would very much appreciate his or her advice because in the coming weeks we will still witness some very important developments.”
Györkös said he hoped that Belgium, which currently holds the rotating presidency, would be able to get member states and MEPs to agree on a budget deal before the end of the year.
He said it was an EU and Hungarian “objective to generate growth…and secure fiscal stability” during 2011. He said the Hungarian government would try to get agreement between member states and the European Parliament on proposals to strengthen economic governance rules that were proposed by an economic task-force and the European Commission. The rules are meant to bolster sanctions and surveillance to prevent future debt crises and to deter governments from overspending.
Györkös said his country would have to ensure EU governments can smoothly implement “a limited treaty change”, which EU leaders are expected to endorse at the 16-17 December European Council. The change would allow a permanent bail-out mechanism to be set up as part of the Lisbon treaty.
Jobs and enlargement
Hungary will also work closely with the Commission to implement the EU’s jobs and growth strategy, which leaders agreed upon earlier this year. It includes meeting new targets on employment and education, and on reducing poverty.
Other issues that Hungary will champion during its EU presidency include examining the challenges that an ageing population will pose for national social security and employment programmes; crafting a European energy policy; breathing new life into the EU’s partnership with its eastern neighbours; and agreeing on a Danube River regional strategy.
Hungary will also push to conclude enlargement talks with Croatia before the end of June, said Györkös, adding hat Hungary hoped to use Croatia’s EU entry “as a model” for other enlargement candidates in the western Balkans.
Two decades after the system was abandoned, former players and coaches still speak highly of a quirky part of American soccer history
American soccer has long had its quirks and idiosyncrasies, little signs of uniqueness melted together by the merging of the world’s game and a unique sporting system. The salary cap still looms large, trades are still the norm and single-entity is still the system that governs the sport throughout the country.
But of all of American soccer’s quirks, few have captivated quite like the shootout. For some, it was a bastardization of the world’s game, a distortion of the rules that isolated America from the rest of the world. They viewed it as a system that was tacky, not unique.
For others, though, it was revolutionary, a viable alternative to the penalty kick system used globally. Johan Cruyff, one of the most famous players and tactical minds the sport has ever seen, said that Europe should adopt the system. Marco van Basten made the argument in 2017 in a pitch to FIFA regarding a number of potential rule changes.
More teams
“This is spectacular for the viewers and interesting for the player,” Van Basten said at the time while also suggesting abolishing the offside rule, getting rid of yellow cards and several other rule changes. “With this idea, [the player] has more possibilities: he can dribble, shoot, wait, and the goalkeeper responds – this is more like a typical playing situation.”
The rules of the shootout were simple. A player stood 35 yards from goal and had five seconds to beat the goalkeeper one-on-one. It wasn’t a penalty kick, where nerves of steel are a player’s biggest attribute. This was a test of dribbling, skill, shooting and timing.
“I thought the shootout was fun,” former U.S. men’s national team manager and current New England Revolution boss Bruce Arena said. “And, you know, it took a lot of talent, the shootout, and there were some remarkable goals and exciting times during the shootout so I thought that was fantastic. I would prefer, actually, in all competitions around the world, if games went into overtime and teams played out the 30 minutes of overtime and it’s still tied, I’d love to see a shootout rather than penalty kicks.”
While the shootout’s run in MLS popularized the system, it was initially used in the NASL during what many consider American soccer’s true heyday. It was a time when players like Cruyff, Pele and George Best dominated the landscape in a league that also had its share of quirks.
From the league’s inception, the NASL used a vastly different point system than the rest of the world. Teams were awarded six points for a win and three points for a draw while also earning one bonus point for each goal scored in a game up to a maximum of three per game. By 1977, Pele’s final year in the league, the NASL had instituted the shootout, with the system eventually deciding the 1981 Soccer Bowl between Chicago Sting and New York Cosmos. By 1984, though, the NASL was out of business, and American soccer hung by a thread.
With the founding of MLS in 1996, the sport was given another chance, and everyone involved knew this would be the last one. Because of that, the league looked to cater to the general public. How could they make the sport more exciting for the casual fan? How could they provide memorable moments that kept fans wanting more?
Rather than a single-table structure, the league implemented a playoff system. Instead of keeping a 90-minute running clock, MLS had a stopping clock that counted down. And, of course, instead of ties, MLS had a 35-yard shootout.
Of the three, only the playoffs remain as the league has generally aligned with the rule book used by the rest of the world. The summer schedule may be different and the salary cap may alter how rosters are constructed but, since the shootout was abandoned in 2000, MLS has largely fallen in line on the field.
“No other league in the world has the type of salary structure or roster and budget guidelines that we that have so there is some uniqueness,” says longtime MLS and USMNT defender Jeff Agoos, who now serves as the league’s technical director of competition. “We also have to balance it with being authentic and understanding that this is the world’s game, that this is more than just the United States and Canada, that we are representative of this region.”
He added: “What I’ll tell you is from a very selfish standpoint I love the shootout, and I would love to see it come back. I don’t think it’s going to come back but I personally really enjoyed that part of it, but I understand where we are today.”
Commission to propose review of EU staff pay as eight member states call for spending cut.
Maroš Šefcovic, the European Commissioner for inter-institutional relations and administration, was today (30 June) expected to publish an outline proposal for a review of EU staff pay and conditions, just as the stakes have been raised by calls from member states for “very substantial reductions” in administrative spending.
Staff salaries, pensions and benefits were particularly targeted by the UK, France, Germany and five other member states in a joint assessment of where there is scope for making savings by the EU institutions during the next multiannual financial framework (MFF).
The eight member states wrote to the European Commission on 20 June, underlining that European administrative spending “cannot be exempt from the considerable efforts made by the member states to reduce their administrative expenditures” – a reference to national governments’ attempts to reduce public deficits that have ballooned in the wake of the financial and economic crises.
Šefcovic has stressed that his proposals, which accompany the legislative proposals on the MFF, are not a response to the demands from the eight member states. He has spoken of the need for changes that are limited and that will safeguard the institutions’ ability to recruit talented individuals. But he does not underestimate the potential of reforming measures: he points out that the most recent reform, in 2004, has already saved the EU €3 billion, and will generate savings of €5bn by 2020.
His proposal will form the basis for consultations with staff unions as well as the other EU institutions on possible reforms. Only later this year will Šefcovic then make a formal proposal, to be submitted to the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament.
Staff unions, anxious to protect their members, have been trying to dissuade Šefcovic from focusing his search for savings on changes to the regulation on pay and pensions. But negotiations on these issues will in any case have to take place in the near future: the agreement on the current method for calculating the annual change in EU officials’ pay expires at the end of 2012, and the system for calculating the rate for pension contributions expires in mid-2013.
Retirement age
The suggestions of the eight member states might offer some material for Šefcovic to reflect on. If the retirement age for staff in EU institutions were more closely to reflect life expectancy, it would go some way to recognise the changes that national governments are having to make to their own pension systems as they seek savings. The allowance that staff receive for living abroad was conceived at a time when it was difficult to attract people to work in the institutions, but its generosity distorts the relation between the pay many officials receive for doing similar jobs.
Fact File
Salary adjustment method
The annual change in the pay of EU officials is calculated in line with the evolution of salaries of civil servants in eight member states (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK). An average is defined, taking account of the size of each national administration, and a cost of living index is applied. Pensions and allowances are adjusted accordingly. The method was agreed in 2004 as part of the last round of reforms.
Member states have complained that the method fails to reflect reductions in salaries at national level. They are uncomfortable at the spectacle of continued pay rises for officials in the EU when their officials at home are seeing their remuneration cut. In 2009 they refused to approve a 3.7% increase calculated using the method. However, their refusal was over-ruled: the Commission, at the urging of unions, took the Council to the European Court of Justice, which decided that staff were entitled to the full increase.
The letter from the eight member states seeks a review of the automatic application of the method, so as to make it possible to “deviate from the adjustment proposal” in the face of budgetary constraints and economic conditions.
The unions defend the current method. They say it accurately reflects the economic situation in member states, with an inevitable delay because it depends on collection of data from national administrations.
They point out that in 2011 the earnings of officials were cut by 2% in real terms, since the increase was only 0.4%, while the Brussels cost of living index rose by 2.4%.
The letter also criticises the use of a special index for the cost of living, the so-called Brussels International Index. This index is higher than the usual consumer price index, as it is intended to reflect the higher spending of international staff on travel, communications and rented accommodation. A special index cannot be justified, say the critical member states, as EU officials are, on average, better paid than those in Belgium. They also challenge the assumption of an automatic salary rise in line with rising prices at a time when Belgium and Luxembourg are being asked to review their wage indexation systems in the interests of greater competitiveness.
The advantage of the current method is that it has provided a predictable formula for calculating annual changes in pay and pensions. It removes the need for time-consuming confrontational annual negotiations, with all the attendant risks of strike action and disruption to the running of the institutions. If member states were to be granted greater flexibility to reject the results generated by the method, the risk of confrontation would increase. So any workable system is likely to resemble the current one because of the need for predictability and a degree of objectivity.
Allowances
EU officials are entitled to allowances for the cost of moving and working abroad, and to taking family members along. The most substantial of these benefits is the expatriation allowance, which amounts to 16% of basic salary. In addition, officials are eligible for a household allowance – designed to compensate a spouse for leaving a job to move with his or her partner – a children’s allowance up to the age of 18 (or 26 if children pursue educational or vocational training), an education allowance for children, and an annual flat-rate travel allowance for a journey to the country of origin. Most of these allowances are at fixed rates.
The letter from the eight seeks a review and wants to compensate staff for the actual cost of expenses incurred. And the expatriation allowance, they say, should diminish in line with the time officials live outside their home country.
Over time, they also recommend that the expatriation allowance should be phased out entirely, so that basic salary levels and working conditions determine whether the institutions are an attractive place to work.
The expatriation allowance makes a significant difference to an official’s income, and is already a cause of dissatisfaction within the institutions, because the criteria for determining entitlement are unclear and open to manipulation.
Pensions
The eight member states say that the pension costs of the EU institutions are “unsustainable”, and that “significant pension reforms” are needed to ensure they are affordable on a long-term basis. An analysis by Eurostat, the EU’s statistical office, projects that pension costs are rising so rapidly that they could exceed active staff costs in the near future.
The funding shortfall is in part a consequence of how the pensions of EU officials are financed. Pension liabilities are paid out of the central EU budget, so instead of individual and employer contributions being paid into a fund that meets pension liabilities, staff pay their contributions into the EU budget, and member states are responsible for paying the remainder – approximately two-thirds. The burden increases as more officials attain retirement age, while the contributions from active staff cover a lower proportion of total pension costs.
Retirement age should be linked to life expectancy, urges the letter from the eight member states. The Commission increased the average retirement age for officials from 61 to 63 as part of the 2004 reforms, but the eight want to go further. They cite conclusions agreed by the Council of Ministers in 2010 on the sustainability of pensions, and they draw comparisons with Commission recommendations to member states to bring retirement ages into line with demographic developments as part of efforts to improve competitiveness.
In addition, the eight favour a reduction in the rate at which pension rights are accumulated – currently fixed at 1.9% of basic salary per year of service, up to a maximum of 70%. They also call for an end to early retirement without financial penalties. But the letter recognises that existing acquired pension rights would have to be respected. As a result, these changes would produce savings only in the future, – limiting their potential for “substantial savings”.
Special levy
The first special levy, an additional tax on officials’ salaries, was introduced in the 1970s in response to the oil crisis. The current levy is 5.5%, an increase this year from the 2.5% level set in 2004. But it expires in 2012. The eight regard the levy as no longer “special”, but as an “established part of EU revenue” for almost 30 years, and they want it not only increased, but also applied to pensions.
Career structure
The member states’ letter challenges the current system for promotions, in force since the reforms of 2004, which is based on a combination of seniority, duties and responsibilities.
Grades and remuneration should be “more clearly linked to performance, responsibility and management functions”, says the letter. It says promotion and progress should no longer be career-based and automatic.
Unions have singled this out as “the most dangerous part” of the eight’s plans, saying it could open the way to favouritism and would “break solidarity” among officials.
But others argue that a merit-based system is needed to ensure that talented, hard-working officials are rewarded for their efforts and can see a career path that is based on taking on extra responsibilities, including personnel and budget management.
The reforms suggested by the eight would not generate the large savings they say are needed to mirror efforts being made at national level. Savings on the scale they envisage may be possible only by pushing through more radical cuts in future pay and pension levels. The price of that would be to make the institutions less attractive to employees.
The staff unions believe that some member states already have an agenda to undermine the institutions, and this conditions their reaction to the letter. They point out that the Commission already struggles to recruit highly-qualified British, Scandinavian and German staff, especially to work in areas such as competition law, arguably one of the most important of the EU’s competences.
Radical moves
Drafts of Šefcovic’s proposals suggest that he may be considering some radical moves. They include a 5% reduction in staff numbers in all institutions, bodies and agencies, an increase in working time from 37.5 to 40 hours without any compensating change in payment, retaining the 5.5% additional tax on salaries (the so-called ‘special levy’), raising the retirement age from 63 to 65 and the early retirement age from 55 to 58, and recruiting clerical staff as contract agents on a permanent basis rather than as officials.
It is evident that the debate on future funding of the EU as a whole cannot be conducted to the exclusion of these issues, so flat rejection by the unions of any reform of pay and conditions is untenable. But member states also have to bear in mind that excessive pruning could ultimately weaken the institutions’ capacities, and that would reduce the Commission’s ability to enforce competition law or single market rules.
TAMPA, FL — Nik Wallenda will be treated to a bird’s-eye view of the just-completed 15-story hotel tower at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino.
The seventh-generation member of the Great Wallendas world-famous tightrope-walking family will navigate a half-inch-wide wire strung between the new and existing hotel towers on Thursday as part of the celebration marking the completion of the hotel and casino’s $700 million expansion.
Wallenda, whose high-wire feats have received worldwide television coverage, won’t be alone: He’ll perform the high-wire walk 150 feet in the air with his 67-year-old mother, Delilah Wallenda of Sarasota.
This will be an especially memorable walk for Delilah Wallenda, who plans to retire after this final feat.
The last time the mother and son performed together was on June 7, 2011, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, when they re-created the high-wire walk between the two towers of the Condado Plaza Hotel that claimed the life of Nik Wallenda’s great-grandfather on March 22, 1978. At age 73, Karl Wallenda lost his balance, teetered on the wire for 30 heart-stopping seconds and then plummeted 10 stories to his death.
“The reality is it’s very dangerous,” Nik Wallenda said of his chosen profession.
He admitted to being a bit nervous for his mother because she recently had hip replacement and back surgery. But she has her doctor’s OK to perform the walk and is determined to do it, he said.
“I’m proud to walk with her one last time,” he said. “This is something very, very special. We love what we do. This is our passion.”
Nik Wallenda holds 10 world records. Among his feats, he was the first person to walk a wire directly over Niagara Falls and the Grand Canyon. In June, he and his sister, Lijana, walked a wire 230 feet (25 stories) above Times Square in New York City (see video). He said his sister plans to be on hand Thursday to watch their mother’s last walk.
The walk will take place at 12:10 p.m. after 10 a.m. ceremonies during Seminole Hard Rock Tampa’s Grand Celebration Weekend, which runs Thursday to Sunday. The event will commemorate the completion of an expansion that includes the new hotel tower, pool and spa, retail and dining outlets.
In June, Nik Wallenda and his sister, Lijana, walked a wire 230 feet (25 stories) above Times Square in New York City. (High Wire Live/Nik Wallenda)
The Thursday event schedule will also include a performance by Light Balance, a hi-tech neon and LED show that contains elements of acrobatic and dance choreography. The group earned the Golden Buzzer Award during its audition for Season 12 of “America’s Got Talent” and finished third overall in the competition.
A Nightlife Party in the new Hard Rock Event Center at 8 p.m. Thursday will feature performances by DJ Jazzy Jeff and Big Boi, a member of the hip hop duo Outkast.
At 9 p.m. Friday, country artist and “American Idol” judge Keith Urban will perform in the Hard Rock Event Center.
The Grand Celebration Weekend will conclude with a pool party at noon Sunday hosted by celebrity DJ Brody Jenner.
See related stories:
Seminole Hard Rock Casino Plans $700 Million Expansion In Tampa
Elvis’ 24-Karat Gold Piano A Key Feature Of Hard Rock Hotel
LOS ANGELES, CA — A magnitude 3.7 earthquake rattled Los Angeles early Friday morning at 12:19 a.m. Its was epicenter in Compton, perilously close to the a fault that ruptured decades ago and caused extensive damage and more than 100 deaths.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the quake was just over 15 miles deep. The quake struck about 1.5 miles west of East Rancho Dominguez and southwest of Lynwood, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
It was felt across the Los Angeles region as well as parts of northern Orange County. There were no immediate reports of damage or injuries. Within minutes more than 100 people reported feeling the shaking to the U.S. Geological Survey.
The intensity of the shaking wasn’t strong enough to set off the city’s early warning system, ShakeAlertLA, so residents did not receive a warning, which calculated that light shaking was felt in Compton, Lynwood, Gardena, Willowbrook, Lakewood and northern Long Beach.
Weaker shaking was likely felt throughout the Los Angeles Basin and the San Gabriel Valley. Homes in Burbank and Rowland Heights shuddered, according to the geological survey.
Officials did not immediately identify the fault line responsible for the quake but said the epicenter was about two miles from a mapped strand of the Newport-Inglewood fault. Fault lines responsible for past quakes in the area include the Compton thrust fault and the Newport-Inglewood fault, which ruptured in 1933, killing 120 people.
See Also:
THIS IS A DEVELOPING STORY. PLEASE REFRESH THE SCREEN FOR UDATES
Katherine, la mère de Michael Jackson, a obtenu la garde provisoire de Prince Michael, 12 ans, Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, 11 ans, et Prince Michael II, sept ans. Elle entend bien les avoir définitivement sous son aile.
Katherine Jackson, la mère de Michael Jackson est sur le sentier de la guerre. Pour elle, pas question de laisser la mémoire et le patrimoine de son fils partir en fumée, et ce au nom des trois enfants de Bambi.
Ils s’appellent Prince Michael, 12 ans, Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, 11 ans, et Prince Michael II, sept ans, ils ont respectivement 12,11 et 7 ans. Et leur grand-mère de 79 printemps vient d’obtenir officiellement leur garde.
Certes, Katherine Jackson n’est pas définitivement leur responsable légale. Pour cela, il va falloir attendre un jugement du tribunal qui se réunira à ce sujet début août, le 3, selon nos confrères du Figaro. Une décision somme toute logique, étant donné leur degré de parenté avec Katherine, mais aussi parce que c’est elle qui s’en occupe depuis la mort soudaine de Michael Jackson.
Mais Katherine Jackson sait qu’on ne vit pas d’amour et d’eau fraîche. Du coup, elle a également émis le vœu de devenir l’administratrice des biens de Michael Jackson.
Mais pour l’instant, alors que le clan Jackson jette le trouble sur les circonstances de la mort de Michael, Katherine se heurte à un refus des autorités, même si elle clame qu’il ne s’agit pour elle que de mettre à l’abri les jeunes héritiers de Michael Jackson. En admettant que leur artiste de papa ne leur a pas laissé qu’une montagne de dettes…
Click:endless sling #AlertePollutionRivières ou sols contaminés, déchets industriels abandonnés… Vous vivez à proximité d’un site pollué ? Cliquez ici pour nous alerter !Les Vietnamiens l’appellent l’île aux cocotiers. Phú Quốc possède 50 kilomètres de sable blanc léché par des eaux turquoise. Elle est réputée pour être l’une des plus belles îles d’Asie. Dans ce décor idyllique, un pêcheur de calamars depuis vingt-cinq ans admire tous les jours l’île depuis sa petite embarcation. Le paradis tropical recèle de nombreux trésors. Son joyau le plus précieux n’est accessible qu’en bateau. Phú Quốc compte en effet trois fermes perlières gigantesques. Les perles de l’île sont réputées grosses, brillantes et rondes. Trois caractéristiques qui en font des perles prisées. 70% des huîtres produisent une perle Un an après avoir été mises à l’eau, les huîtres doivent être nettoyées. Une étape indispensable pour enlever les impuretés et qu’elles deviennent plus fortes. Elles sont récoltées au bout de trois ans. Seules 70% d’entre elles donneront des perles. Les perles blanches sont vendues 30 euros et les jaunes, plus rares, 80 euros. Pour les fabriquer, il faut introduire dans l’huître un corps étranger, comme un grain de sable, pour activer chez le mollusque un mécanisme de défense à l’origine de la perle. Mais aujourd’hui, l’île est aujourd’hui menacée par le tourisme de masse. De gigantesques complexes hôteliers sont en construction sur le littoral. Click Here: Cheap Golf Golf Clubs
#AlertePollutionRivières ou sols contaminés, déchets industriels abandonnés… Vous vivez à proximité d’un site pollué ? Cliquez ici pour nous alerter !Pas moins de dix prospectus publicitaires en tous genres dans la boîte aux lettres de ce particulier. “C’est du gaspillage de A à Z“, assure Gaiji Khaled, de l’association “Résistance à l’agression publicitaire”. Pourtant, comme un Français sur cinq, il a posté un autocollant sur sa boîte aux lettres signifiant qu’il ne souhaite pas recevoir de publicités. Militant, il a même décidé de peser ces prospectus.Plus de deux kilos de prospectus par mois reçus par ménageÀ l’heure du numérique, le marché du bon vieux prospectus papier ne faiblit pas en France. Il continue même de progresser. Un marché porté par la guerre commerciale que se livrent les enseignes de la grande distribution. Elles produisent toujours plus de papier, tout simplement, car les clients y restent attachés. Chaque ménage reçoit plus de deux kilos de prospectus par mois. C’est 15% de plus qu’il y a quinze ans. Depuis janvier, Monoprix a décidé de sauter le pas. Le seul catalogue papier disponible de l’enseigne se trouve en magasin. Il n’est plus distribué à domicile et ce sont 30 millions de catalogues économisés par an. Le magasin mise désormais sur sa version en ligne.Le JT
JT de 13h du vendredi 11 janvier 2019 L’intégrale
Les autres sujets du JT
1
Attentat de Strasbourg : les hommages préservés
2
“Gilets jaunes” : le centre-ville de Bourges interdit
3
Toulouse : un samedi de soldes menacé ?
4
Politique : la confiance s’effondre
5
Carlos Ghosn : l’ex-patron de Nissan visé par deux nouvelles inculpations
6
Texas : Donald Trump au pied du mur
7
Brexit : l’inquiétude d’un village breton
8
Compte personnel de formation : ce que change le passage en euros pour employés et entreprises
9
Prélèvement à la source : attention aux arnaques sur internet
10
Environnement : ces communes qui font le choix d’un chauffage moins cher et plus vert
11
Corée du Sud : le succès des chiens clonés
12
Musée du Louvre : comment parvient-il à accueillir 10 millions de visiteurs par an ?