October 8, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
If you consider the seventh worst viewer number in history as good news, and last night that was very realistic to consider, Raw came out well against strong competition.
Last night’s show averaged 1.69 million viewers and a 0.52 rating in 18-49 going against the Kansas City Chiefs vs. New England Patriots (14.60 million viewers, 4.0), the Atlanta Falcons vs. Green Bay Packers on ESPN (8.65 million viewers, 2.92), and a New York Yankees vs. Tampa Bay Rays baseball playoff game on TBS (2.33 million, 0.60).
Raw finished 44th on cable for the night, which is likely its lowest finish ever due to the huge ratings for cable news. Raw was behind three football related shows, the baseball game, and two shows on TLC as far as total viewers, as well as 37 news shows. In 18-49, Raw was sixth, behind the four sports broadcasts and 90 Day Fiance.
Raw had a strong first hour, but fell in hour two. Hour three, built around Drew McIntyre & The Street Profits vs. Randy Orton, Robert Roode & Dolph Ziggler, fell, but still had to be considered well above expectations given the competition.
Raw was down eight percent in viewers from last week for a show boosted by coming after a PPV and bringing back Ric Flair, Shawn Michaels, Christian, and Big Show. It was down five percent in 18-49 and nine percent in 18-34.
As compared to the same week one year ago, Raw was down 28 percent in viewers, 31 percent in 18-49, and 43 percent in 18-34.
As far as the first-to-third hour declines, the show was down 13 percent in women 18-49, 12 percent in men 18-49, 25 percent in teenage girls, up five percent in teenage boys, and down nine percent in over 50.
The three hours were:
8 p.m. 1.79 million viewers
9 p.m. 1.67 million viewers
10 p.m. 1.60 million viewers
Click Here: Rugby league Jerseys
October 8, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Press freedom groups are sounding the alarm after news reports revealed that the U.S. government is poised to greenlight a massive telecommunications merger between industry giants AT&T and DirecTV.
On Tuesday, after the Wall Street Journal first broke the news, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler issued a statement (pdf) indicating his approval of AT&T’s $49 billion acquisition of DirecTV. And though it is unclear when the Commission will formally vote on the merger, as CNN reports, “Wheeler’s recommendation makes government approval of the deal all but certain.”
Under the terms of the buyout, the third- and fifth-largest pay-TV providers in the country will now be combined. Further, as the nation’s second-largest home Internet access provider, AT&T will now have “new power and incentives to thwart online video competition,” media advocacy group Free Press warns.
Responding to the news, Free Press policy director Matt Wood charged that the merger will only thwart competition and hasten the consolidation of the telecommunications industry.
“This deal will send yet another signal to Wall Street that harmful mergers are a better business model than actual and substantial infrastructure investment,” he said. He added that the FCC “must take steps to back up Wheeler’s mantra about competition as millions of people continue to see never-ending price hikes and reduced choices.”
In the FCC statement, Wheeler asserts that the agency has issued a number of conditions for the deal “that will directly benefit consumers,” including a build-out that will reportedly increase consumer access to high-speed broadband.
However, Wood dismisses these commitments are nothing but a series of “empty promises,” that ultimately “won’t do enough to offset this deal’s many harms.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 8, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that Texas’s controversial voter ID law, the most severe in the country, has a “discriminatory effect” against minority voters, in what civil rights campaigners say is an important step towards justice for African-American, Latino, and low-income people suppressed under the rule.
The three judge panel determined that the law, passed by the state in 2011, violates what’s left of the Voting Rights Act after it was gutted by the Supreme Court in 2013. The ruling itself comes just one day before the 50th anniversary of the Act, which was the product of the mass organizing and protests of the civil rights and black freedom movements.
“We recognize the charged nature of accusations of racism, particularly against a legislative body, but we also recognize the sad truth that racism continues to exist in our modern American society despite years of laws designed to eradicate it,” wrote the three-judge panel for the New Orleans court, which is known for being conservative.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision, however, fell short of issuing a broad injunction against the 2011 law, instead determining that it must be sent to a lower district court to find an appropriate remedy. It was not immediately clear whether the state will continue to enforce the rule in the meantime.
This is not the first time a judge has ruled against the law. In 2014, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzoles Ramos overturned the rule on the grounds that it has “an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans” and compared it to a poll tax. She noted that voter suppression under the law was vast, with over 600,000 registered voters in Texas lacking the required documentation.
However, Texas successfully appealed this ruling, and the law was in effect during the November 2014 election, thereby disenfranchising large numbers of voters. Wednesday’s decision is a blow against the 2011 rule but falls short of the Ramos ruling.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Nonetheless, civil rights groups were buoyed by the development.
“We are greatly encouraged by today’s decision,” declared Gary Bledsoe, president of the Texas NAACP and an attorney with PotterBledsoe, in a press statement. “This decision acknowledges the problems Texas African American and Latino voters have experienced as cited by their leaders since the law was first implemented, that it blatantly discriminates against minority voters.”
“We call upon the Attorney General to stop these efforts and not seek a rehearing or an appeal to the United States Supreme Court,” Bledsoe continued. “There is no need to prolong discriminatory practices that truly are hurting Texans of color.”
“The Texas Legislature was determined to adopt the most restrictive photo identification law in the country, and it rejected repeated opportunities to reduce the law’s negative effects,” declared Ezra Rosenberg, co-director of the Voting Rights Project. “It should come as no surprise that the court found a violation of federal law.”
Wednesday’s decision has broad implications for other voter suppression laws across the country. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, “Since the 2010 election, 21 states have new laws in place making it harder to vote, and 15 states will have new rules in effect for the first time in a presidential election in 2016.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership
October 8, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
As the number of civilians impacted by the intensifying conflict in Afghanistan rises along with the fighting, humanitarian agencies are struggling to meet the needs of the wounded, hungry and displaced.
The first half of 2015 has seen “record high levels” of civilian casualties, the United Nations relief agency said Tuesday, with civilian deaths touching 1,592 and total non-combatant casualties standing at over 4,900 – a one-percent increase compared to the number of casualties in the same period in 2014.
Fresh fighting in the provinces of Helmand, Kunduz, Faryab and Nangarhar are indicative of the geographic spread of the conflict, while tensions and sporadic clashes all across the central regions are forcing huge numbers of civilians from their homes.
An estimated 103,000 people have been displaced by the conflict in 2015 alone, including from locations hitherto untouched by forced population movements including Badakshan, Sar-i-Pul, Baghlan, Takhar and Badgis, the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said in its mid-year review released on Aug. 18.
Clashes between the Taliban and other armed opposition groups are becoming more frequent, and the fragmentation of these groups only means that both the complexity and geographic extent of the conflict will continue to worsen.
Having received only 195 million dollars, or 48 percent of its 406 million-dollar funding requirement as of July, the U.N.’s humanitarian response plan is faltering.
Funding for every single relief “cluster” identified by OCHA is failing to keep pace with civilians’ needs. So far, the U.N. has received only 3.5 million dollars of the required 40 million dollars for provision of emergency housing, while funding for food security and health are falling short by 56 million and 29 millions dollars respectively.
Far more refugees have returned to the country, primarily from Pakistan, in the first half of 2015 compared to the same period last year, with 43,695 returnees as of July 2015 compared to 9,323 in 2014.
OCHA noted, “Overall return and deportee rates of undocumented Afghans from Iran and Pakistan stand at 319,818 people. At the same time, over 73,000 undocumented Afghans returned from Pakistan, which is on average six times higher per day than in 2014.”
U.N. officials say they need at least 89 million dollars to adequately meet the needs of refugees, but so far only 22.5 million dollars have been pledged.
As is always the case, providing adequate water and sanitation facilities is one of the top priorities of the humanitarian plan in order to prevent the outbreak of disease, but though the U.N. has put forward a figure of 25 million dollars for this purpose, only 15 million dollars are currently available.
“An increase in people requiring humanitarian assistance coupled with insufficient funding for food security agencies, particularly WFP [the World Food Programme], means that programmes for conflict IDPs, vulnerable returnees, refugees and malnourished children are all seriously under-resourced and in some cases have been terminated,” the report revealed.
Data on affected populations are believed to be incomplete owing largely to inaccessibility of the most heavily embattled regions, prompting U.N. officials to warn that the real number of people in need of critical, lifesaving services and supplies could be even higher than current estimates.
© 2019 Inter Press Service
October 8, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Ashley Diamond, a transgender woman who sued the state of Georgia for housing her in men’s prisons and subjecting her to abuse since 2012, was unexpectedly paroled on Monday following a grueling legal battle.
“I’m overjoyed to be with my family again and out of harm’s way,” Diamond said after her release. “Although the systematic abuse and assaults I faced for more than three years have left me emotionally and physically scarred, I’ll continue to fight for justice and to shine a light on the gross mistreatment of transgender inmates in Georgia and nationwide.”
Diamond, 37, filed a lawsuit against the state in February, alleging that prison officials denied her access to hormone treatments and other medical needs, prevented her from expressing her gender identity, and allowed her to be sexually and physically assaulted by other inmates. Her previous requests for transfer to a lower-security level prison were denied.
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which represented Diamond, welcomed the news but added that Diamond’s parole did not equal justice.
“While we’re thrilled that Ashley Diamond is out of prison, our lawsuit is far from over,” said SPLC staff attorney Chinyere Ezie. “Ashley has endured more than three years of systematic abuse based on the Georgia Department of Corrections’ unconstitutional policies toward transgender inmates and woeful lack of care.”
“Her release does not erase her barbaric treatment by GDC officials, which was tantamount to torture,” Ezie continued. “Nor is her plight isolated. We will continue to advocate for an end to prison practices that unfairly punish and inflict pain on transgender inmates.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
According to Diamond’s lawsuit, she was initially processed into the Georgia correctional system as a male, despite declaring to officers that she was a woman. Since entering prison in 2012, Diamond has suffered 10 sexual assaults, including one which occurred after her lawsuit was filed and correctional officers housed her with a known sex offender.
In addition, she said, being forced to suppress her gender identity has increased her impulses to self-harm. Diamond has survived attempts at suicide and self-castration.
Being barred from self-expression “is the cruelest form of torture I can imagine,” Diamond stated in her most recent court filing. “It intensifies my gender dysphoria and creates mental anguish and physical distress by communicating to me that my entire existence is wrong. I am constantly misgendered by GDC personnel who insist on referring to me using male pronouns, calling me demeaning names like ‘faggot,’ ‘he/she’ and ‘it.’”
“Twenty-four hours a day I battle a debilitating and agonizing desire to end my life, because being forced to change my gender and live as male makes me feel like I am already dead.”
The parole also comes after the U.S. Department of Justice expressed its support of Diamond’s case in a statement of interest filed in April—a move which prompted a policy change by state officials allowing “medically appropriate” treatment for transgender inmates.
Ezie told the New York Times on Monday that she was “very pleasantly surprised” to hear of Diamond’s parole and saw it as an auspicious sign. “Departments of correction nationwide are being dragged kicking and screaming into the future, using early release to avoid making substantive changes that will affect transgender inmates’ lives,” she said.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: Golf special
October 8, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
With a passionate press conference outside the White House on Tuesday morning, a sweeping coalition of climate, labor, Indigenous, and public health groups and leaders called on President Barack Obama to make the United States the first nation to commit to keeping all of its remaining, unleased public fossil fuels in the ground.
Such a move is imperative, the more than 400 organizations and individuals wrote in a letter outlining their demands.
“The cost of continuing federal fossil fuel leasing to our land, climate, and communities is too high,” reads the missive delivered Tuesday. “The science is clear that, to maintain a good chance of avoiding catastrophic levels of warming, the world must keep the vast majority of its remaining fossil fuels in the ground. Federal fossil fuels—those that you control—are the natural place to begin.”
Speaking to Obama’s ability to set an international precedent, the letter continues: “Each new federal fossil fuel lease opens new deposits for development that should be deemed unburnable. By placing those deposits off limits, stopping new leasing would help align your administration’s energy policy with a safer climate future and global carbon budgets.”
The campaign comes just days after the Obama administration announced it would open nearly 40 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico to new oil and gas drilling leases, and one month after it approved a permit for Royal Dutch Shell to drill in the Arctic.
Of course, significant damage has been done on the more than 67 million acres of public land and ocean already leased to the fossil fuel industry.
“Dirty energy companies ruin our lands, while the profit goes elsewhere,” said Indigenous activist Louise Benally, of Big Mountain Diné Nation, in a statement. “Environmental concerns are not being addressed properly by agencies that should be accountable. Groundwater tables have dropped by big drops, the greenhouse gases being released into the air are not monitored correctly, and health impacts are not monitored at all. This devastation of our communities is a kind of terrorism made possible by Senators like John McCain, all while President Obama turns a blind eye. These industries are not accountable to the land, the natural world, or the people living here. Their destruction has to stop now.”
As the Washington Post wrote on Monday, “the statement is significant because it represents the latest stage in the development of a climate grass-roots movement that has already brought us the Keystone XL pipeline battle.”
Michael Brune, the executive director of the Sierra Club, which backed the statement, agreed. “I think that this is the next frontier of climate advocacy,” he told the Post. “We know that we have made genuine progress in cutting carbon from cars and trucks and increasingly from the electric sector. And all of that is important, it’s necessary—and it won’t get the job done unless we begin to curtail development of fossil fuels, particularly in sensitive areas.”
The letter’s signatories claim Obama has the power to dub untapped oil, gas, and coal reserves “unburnable” under existing federal laws.
“Such leadership is necessary to ensure a livable climate and planet for both present and future generations,” they wrote.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 7, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Republicans control both the House and Senate, but the unified GOP Congress might not last past the midterms. House Republicans are seeing signs that Democrats could take a significant number of House seats in the 2018 elections.
President Trump’s approval ratings currently sit in the low 40s — a historic low for this point in a presidency. The GOP Congress, meanwhile, has achieved no major legislative goals in Trump’s first 70 days in office.
Questions about Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election and the FBI’s investigation into possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign continue to cast a shadow over the government and distract from the party’s legislative efforts.
Enthusiasm on the left is high, giving Democrats hope that they will fill their coffers and increase voter turnout in special elections such as the nationally watched House special election in Georgia.
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, there is plenty of time for things to change over the next 19 months. Winning back the House will be an uphill climb for Democrats even in the most favorable circumstances, since the way district lines are drawn means that only a few dozen seats are seen as competitive.
But there’s no doubt that the early signs are positive for Democrats. The case for Democratic gains is bolstered by the historical trend that sees the president’s party typically lose seats in the midterm.
“I think the House is in play,” Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel told The Hill in a recent interview. “You always have to assume the House is in play just because of history.
“So you want to make sure you are running as if you are behind always. We’re taking the House very seriously.”
Republicans have held the House since 2010, when a wave election amid ObamaCare backlash propelled them to the majority. They largely defended that historic majority in 2016, losing only six seats. And, looking ahead to 2018, the House GOP campaign arm reported a record haul in the first quarter of 2017, with nearly $36 million in contributions.
In 2018, Democrats need to net 24 seats to regain the majority — although that number could change depending on the outcome of five special elections.
The party’s success will depend on candidate recruitment, ample fundraising and factors like Trump’s approval rating closer to Election Day. If it continues to hover in the low 40s, though, that will likely be detrimental to GOP incumbents.
“If President Trump’s popularity remains where it is, that’s going to be a really hard thing for Republicans to run on,” said a former aide at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC).
Even with Republicans in charge of both Congress and the White House, the party has seen little movement so far on their legislative issues, including a bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare.
Republicans campaigned on dismantling ObamaCare for seven years, and House GOP leadership proposed the American Health Care Act last month with Trump’s full support. Yet the conservative and moderate wings of the party were unhappy with much of the bill, which proved deeply unpopular in polls and was ultimately pulled before the House vote.
“The health debacle is a huge problem for Republicans and compounded by the fact that we don’t have anyone to blame anymore,” a former National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) staffer said.
In the wake of the bill’s defeat, Republicans are looking to again compromise with both GOP factions. But lawmakers home for the April recess must face conservative constituents frustrated by the party’s failure to pass their bill — as well as ObamaCare supporters agitated by the threat of repeal.
Some GOP strategists are fretting over a potential deal with the conservative House Freedom Caucus, which strongly opposed the initial bill. The group’s chairman, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), said most members would support it if it scrapped three ObamaCare regulations, including one that insurers must cover people with pre-existing conditions.
“If we’re going to let the Freedom Caucus get [rid] of coverage for preexisting conditions, we might as well give up the House right now,” the former NRCC staffer said. “Those TV ads could be deadly.”
Democrats feel emboldened by the botched healthcare vote, slamming GOP lawmakers who voted for it in committee. They also believe the bill could position them better with senior voters, who have gravitated to the GOP since 2006.
“For certain demographics, they’re putting forward policies that have the potential to really turn off voters that Democrats need,” the former DCCC aide said. “A number of things Republicans have proposed … they’re totally toxic to older Americans.
“The number of opportunities the Democrats have may be smaller [than in 2006], but there’s still a pathway to win the majority.”
Hot-button issues like healthcare currently dominate the electoral narrative, but NRCC spokesman Jesse Hunt points out that they could fade by 2018 as other issues come to the forefront.
“[Republicans] shut down the government [in 2013] and that never reared its head in 2014,” Hunt said. “So I think it’s really early to make any determination about what direction things might go in as far as what’s going to decide the majority or whether or not it’s going to flip.”
Still, Democrats are bullish that they can reverse their fortunes in 2018. Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), chairman of the DCCC, said in February that the party will flip seats, though he wouldn’t say whether they’ll win back the majority.
The DCCC has an early list of 59 targets, though many of them are only reachable if 2018 turns into a wave election. And the possibility of major Democratic gains will largely be out of the party’s hands, noted Kyle Kondik, managing editor of Sabato’s Crystal Ball.
“Democrats have a path to winning a House majority next year, but that possibility is highly dependent on variables over which they have effectively no control,” Kondik wrote last month.
“Democrats only begin with a short list of real targets next year. But Democrats have a much longer list of potential targets … which they could put into play if the national mood breaks in their favor.”
Since Trump’s victory, Democrats have been fired up and are protesting at GOP town halls across the country.
Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) said Republicans underestimated the intensity of the healthcare debate, saying recent district town halls were like nothing he’s seen before in his political career.
“I think a part of it was a discounting from a Republican standpoint of the amount of energy that is behind the healthcare debate,” Sanford told reporters last week.
Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Head rompers
“I saw more political energy than I have ever seen in my entire time in politics,” Sanford said of the town halls.
And Democrats are looking to energize voters in Georgia’s special election to fill the seat left vacant by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. The party has gone all-in for 30-year-old Jon Ossoff, hoping to make the race a referendum on Trump. A victory in a reliably conservative district could serve as an early indicator and a preview of the midterm electorate’s mood — and further disrupt congressional Republicans.
“If we’re competitive in seats like that, that’s an ominous sign for Republicans,” the former DCCC aide said.
Special elections in Montana and Kansas are also starting to trigger last-minute attention. Republicans have put in money fighting the Democratic nominee in Montana’s special election, while the party has unexpectedly gotten involved in Kansas, with help from Vice President Pence and Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump’s public standing sags after Floyd protests GOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police MORE (R-Texas).
Still, strategists from both parties caution that these races are unique, primarily serving instead as a way to test messaging and learn lessons for future elections.
For Democrats, putting the House in play will require a party-wide message that mobilizes voters to head to the polls.
“They’ve got to really develop and hone in on a message that is aspirational, that really draws a clear contrast with the other side and motivates our base to turnout,” the former DCCC aide said.
Cristina Marcos and Ben Kamisar contributed.
October 7, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Human-induced climate change has pushed the Earth to the brink of a major shift as scientists predict rapidly rising global temperatures within the next two years.
A study, titled Big Changes Underway in the Climate System? (pdf) and published by the British Meteorological Office, notes that heightened greenhouse gas emissions will exacerbate the naturally-occurring phenomenon known as El Niño to push global temperatures to record highs.
This temporary warming of surface waters in the Pacific, known as El Niño, drives dramatic shifts in rainfall, temperature, and wind patterns worldwide, and can last for months or even years.
In the short term, this means that the Southern Hemisphere can expect record heatwaves during its 2015-2016 summer season, coupled with the extreme weather events, such as typhoons, typically associated with an El Niño.
“It looks very likely that globally 2014, 2015 and 2016 will all be amongst the very warmest years ever recorded,” said scientist Rowan Sutton, who peer-reviewed the study.
“This is not a fluke,” Sutton, who works for the National Centre for Atmospheric Science, continued. “We are seeing the effects of energy steadily accumulating in the Earth’s oceans and atmosphere, caused by greenhouse gas emissions.”
In the most recent El Niño update released last Thursday, the National Weather Service also noted the planet is currently experiencing the upswing of one of the strongest El Niño events, and quite possibly the strongest, of the past 65 years of recordkeeping.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
More broadly, researchers say that the Earth may be seeing the end of a global slowdown in surface temperature increases—known by some as the global warming “pause”—and can expect to enter a period of higher temperature increases, returning to the heightened rate seen before the downtrend began.
“It is now likely that decadal warming rates will reach late 20th century levels in the next couple of years,” said the study’s lead researcher, professor Adam Scaife, of the Met Office Hadley Centre.
The study comes as international delegates are preparing for the COP21 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meeting in Paris from November 30 to December 11, during which they are expected to cement climate policies with the aim of keeping global warming below 2°C.
Scaife notes that the combination of both natural and man-made factors has brought us to a “turning point” in the Earth’s climate trajectory.
“We believe we are at an important point in the time series of the Earth’s climate and we’ll look back on this period as an important turning point,” he said. “That’s why we’re emphasizing it because we’re seeing so many big changes at once.”
Scaife notes that El Niños and atmospheric oscillations in the Atlantic are “natural.” However, he adds, “they are now occurring on top of the influence coming from man’s activity, so when they occur, when an El Niño comes and raises the global temperature, that is the icing on the cake, that is the extra bit that creates a record.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: COLLINGWOOD MAGPIES 2019
October 7, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Organizers of a citizens’ initiative on Wednesday delivered a petition with over three million signatures to the European Commission headquarters in Brussels in their continuing bid to stop trade deals they say pose a threat to democracy and boon to corporate interests.
They say the number of signatures—over 3.2 million at the time of publication—is proof of the vast public opposition to the trade deals in question: the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada, and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the EU and United States.
“By signing this petition, an unprecedented three million people from countries across Europe have made it clear that they reject these dangerous Trojan horse treaties which benefit big corporations at the expense of people,” stated Magda Stoczkiewicz, director of Friends of the Earth Europe.
Their petition, which has the support of over 500 European organizations, states:
As the London-based Global Justice Now explains in a media statement, the petition
“Three million people demanding an end to the TTIP negotiations shows that the EU does not have the public mandate to continue this deal,” the organization’s director, Nick Dearden, adds. “People across Europe are standing up to protect our labour rights, our environmental standards and vital public services, like the [National Health Service], from TTIP. Everything that we know about this secretive trade deal shows that it is very little about trade and very much about enshrining a massive corporate power grab.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: brisbane lions guernsey 2019
October 7, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
The leader of RETRIBUTION appears to have been revealed on tonight’s episode of Raw.
Mustafa Ali aligned with RETRIBUTION on Raw tonight, with it being indicated that he’s the leader of the group. Ali faced MVP on Raw tonight and MVP’s Hurt Business stablemates Bobby Lashley and Shelton Benjamin entered the ring during the match. As they cornered Ali, the lights started to flicker.
RETRIBUTION then appeared and surrounded the ring. Ali acted like he was going to fight alongside The Hurt Business. He left the ring and went face-to-face with T-Bar (Dominik Dijakovic) and Mace (Dio Maddin), but Ali then turned around, smiled at MVP, Lashley, and Benjamin, and ordered RETRIBUTION to attack.
After The Hurt Business were laid out, Ali stood in the ring and nodded at RETRIBUTION. They joined him in the ring and Ali then posed with RETRIBUTION standing behind him.
Samoa Joe wondered on commentary how long Ali has been part of this. Byron Saxton said it looks like Ali is running RETRIBUTION.
Ali, Apollo Crews & Ricochet defeated MVP, Lashley & Benjamin in a six-man tag match on Raw last week. Tonight, Lashley & Benjamin defeated Crews & Ricochet in a tag match. Ali confronted MVP, Lashley, and Benjamin backstage after. The Hurt Business thought Ali was crazy for confronting them alone. Ali said he’d be alone out there for his match against MVP too, but he didn’t want MVP to be alone. He told MVP to bring Lashley and Benjamin with him and said he’d take care of them when he’s done with MVP.
Click Here: Rugby league Jerseys