October 7, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
With strong opening remarks at the launch of the United Nations-sponsored climate summit Monday morning, U.S. President Barack Obama “has lifted up climate change as the great moral issue of our time,” said 350.org director May Boeve. “Now, he must deliver.”
“We have the power,” to curb climate change, Obama said in a 14-minute speech on the first day of the COP21 conference. “But only if we rise to this moment.”
Global leaders are gathering in Paris over the next two weeks to negotiate a deal to avert dangerous global warming and provide assistance to frontline nations already dealing with the impacts of rising sea levels and deteriorating ecosystems.
But civil society and environmental groups warned delegates that there is no more time to waste on empty rhetoric and inadequate targets.
Click Here: camiseta river plate
“Climate catastrophes are a reality right now…. COP21 is not based on that reality, only on what is politically expedient,” said Alberto Salamando, a human rights expert with the Indigenous Environmental Network.
A “Trojan horse” for fossil fuels
The groundwork for a subpar deal—heavily influenced by the fossil fuel industry—is already being laid, according to a grassroots alliance of frontline advocacy groups which traveled to Paris this week to speak out against the agreement as it currently stands.
That includes an emphasis on market-based and corporate-friendly solutions, rather than renewable energy, and a targeted exclusion of voices from the Least Developed Countries (LDC) delegation and green groups operating from the sidelines.
In his speech, Obama touted a recent agreement on a hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) phase-out and U.S. plans to join a clean energy project announced Monday. “Let’s show businesses and investors that the global economy is on a firm path to a low carbon future,” he said in his remarks.
However, such capitalist-oriented climate promises are a “Trojan horse” for the fossil fuel industry and a “crime against vulnerable communities,” according to Grassroots Global Justice.
“If the Obama administration is serious about climate change they also have to be serious about the changes they are willing to make,” said Kandi Mosset of the Indigenous Environmental Network. “Those changes will not be easy, but going the easy way and conceding to fossil fuel interests is what got us to this crisis in the first place…. It’s time to change and stand with the people, not the polluters.”
“The President’s own delays…mean that we have an even larger hole to climb out of.”
—Jamie Henn, 350.org
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Other world leaders used their platforms to call for much bolder action. In his speech to the summit on Monday, Bolivian President Evo Morales unequivocally named capitalism as the most environmentally destructive force and introduced a series of solutions written by many of Latin America’s social movements to save “Mother Earth.”
As Boeve explained, the answers are clear, and they come from the activists and advocacy groups that have demonstrated tirelessly in cities around the world to highlight their message of a clean future.
“We must end the use of fossil fuels and fully transition to 100 [percent] renewable energy by 2050,” she said. “Here in Paris, politicians must agree on that North Star and chart a clear course to get there. The hundreds of thousands who took to the streets over the weekend for the Global Climate March expect nothing less.”
The whole world is watching
Obama acknowledged the U.S.’s part in fueling climate change, as the world’s largest economy and its second-largest emitter, and noted that the 150 leaders attending the summit are under global scrutiny for their decisions in Paris. “Let there be no doubt, the next generation is watching what we do,” he said.
That includes activists on the ground in Paris, who defied a protest ban and, in some cases, faced off with police during a violent crackdown on marches over the weekend. Maxime Combes, an organizer with the advocacy group Attac France, told Common Dreams that the “struggle for climate justice will not stop. We have a duty to stand up and continue to fight for a just and livable planet for all.”
“To be standing in the streets to fight against climate change, whatever is the form, is a resistance against all the fanatical visions of religion that spread terror, against all the scavengers who are propagating hatred and racism, and against all the pseudo democrats who are [undermining] our democracy and who are selling our freedom for nothing,” Combes said.
“We have a duty to stand up and continue to fight for a just and livable planet for all.”
—Maxime Combes, Attac France
Annie Leonard, executive director of Greenpeace U.S., said the president’s remarks “made clear that communities around the world can’t wait any longer for real action on climate. His speech showed that the political leaders and diplomats gathered in Paris need to deliver an ambitious agreement to protect those least responsible yet most affected by climate change.”
“As the world’s second largest emitter and the biggest economy, the U.S. has a key role as a leader in international climate negotiations,” Leonard said. “That leadership entails a huge responsibility to those most affected by the negative impacts of climate change, not only in America but all over the world.”
Indeed, 350.org communications director Jamie Henn said Monday that Obama’s comments ring hollow in light of his environmental track record.
“After he took four years to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, and waited to really start acting on climate until the final years of his Presidency, it’s a bit ironic to hear President Obama warning us that ‘there is such a thing as being too late.’ The President’s own delays, and his years of promoting an ‘all of the above’ strategy, mean that we have an even larger hole to climb out of when it comes to climate,” Henn said in an email to Common Dreams. “It makes it all the more urgent the President builds on his rhetoric and starts keeping fossil fuels in the ground.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A bombed passenger airliner that killed 224.
Dramatic and deadly attacks against civilians in Paris, Beirut, Baghdad, and elsewhere that killed hundreds more.
Escalating airstrikes by foreign fighter jets, drones, and cruise missiles against targets inside Iraq and Syria that are killing untold numbers of innocent people.
It’s not a world war—at least not yet— but the growing global focus on the Islamic State militant group that currently holds territory in both Iraq and Syria is brewing an increasingly volatile situation that is reverberating from the heart of the Middle East to the major cities of Paris, Beirut, and Moscow, and taking center stage in the political conversations in the U.S., across Europe, and beyond.
As France on Tuesday concluded a second wave of heavy airstrikes against alleged ISIS targets inside Syria and pressed European allies to join them in response to recent attacks in Paris, the Russian military also pounded targets in areas controlled by the group following an official announcement from Moscow that last month’s downing of a passenger airliner in Egypt was, conclusive evidence shows, an intentional bombing.
Alexander Bortnikov, head of Russia’s FSB security service, appeared alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin during a televised meeting from Moscow as he confirmed that overwhelming evidence now exists showing how the October 31 downing of plane—carrying 224 people, mostly Russian tourists—in Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula was “unequivocally a terrorist act.”
Though individuals and groups claiming to represent ISIS had claimed responsibility for the act, Russian officials said they were not yet certain of who planted the bomb. On Tuesday, they offered a $50 million reward for information leading to the perpetrators while Putin vowed aggressive action.
“We will search for them everywhere, no matter where they are hiding,” said Putin during a televised meeting of his security cabinet. “We will find them in any place on the planet and will punish them.”
Putin later said that coordination between its military and France was essential in order to intensify assaults against ISIS inside Syria. “It’s necessary to establish direct contact with the French and work with them as allies,” the Russian president said.
The expressed anger and military escalation by both the French and Russian governments comes as diplomatic efforts, which began in Vienna two weeks ago, advanced with informal talks between U.S. President Obama and Putin on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Turkey this weekend.
On Tuesday, Secretary of State John Kerry said that new progress on a framework for joint action by the U.S., Russia, France, European nations, and key Gulf states—including Iran and Saudi Arabia—could mean that a possible cease-fire among some warring factions inside Syria could take place in a matter of weeks.
Click Here: COLLINGWOOD MAGPIES 2019
As the Associated Press reports:
Kerry described the development as a “gigantic step” and said, “If we can get that done, that opens up the aperture for a whole bunch of things. We’re weeks away conceivably from the possibility of a big transition for Syria, and I don’t think enough people necessarily notice that. But that’s the reality.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
At the same time, the Pentagon announced Monday that it had stepped up military strikes against ISIS in Iraq, touting the bombing of a convoy of more than 100 oil tanker trucks it claimed belonged to the group as evidence of a new strategy to defang and defund their operations.
Meanwhile on Tuesday, France became the first European Union country to invoke the 28-nation political bloc’s “mutual-defense clause” which was swiftly adopted by all EU member states.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian made the request in Brussels by asking EU members to take a direct role “in France’s operations in Syria or Iraq, or by easing the load or providing support for France in other operations.”
The clause, which has never been used before, says that “if a member state is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other member states shall have toward it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power.” Though all countries swiftly backed the call, it was unclear what kind of specific support each nation would ultimately put on the table.
Additionally, French President François Hollande is now expected to meet with both Putin and Obama next week to discuss the campaign against the Islamic State and urge for a “grand coalition” against the group.
Writing for the foreign policy-focused website The Lobe Log, former CIA analyst Graham Fuller explains that despite great misgivings about the legacy of the western military interventions in the Middle East—ones that have “not only failed, but have vastly exacerbated nearly all regional situations”—there is no longer any denying that ISIS’ recent attacks, against the Russian airliner in Egypt, Beirut last Thursday, and Paris on Friday, have dramatically changed the game.
“Now,” writes Fuller on Tuesday, “ISIS is the single deepest source of immediate Middle East strategic disorder, with global implications.”
Pushing further, independent writer and researcher Nafeez Ahmed explains in an analysis published Tuesday how the simple-minded focus on these latest high-profile attacks and the predictable knee-jerk military response by powerful governments like France, Russia, and the U.S. actually betray what nearly fifteen years of the so-called “War on Terror” have made obvious. Writes Ahmed:
Such arguments are why so many observers are placing a modicum of hope in the progress of diplomatic reproachment between key regional and global actors.
And, while expressing alarm and concern over the many civilians likely dying as a result of the U.S., French, and Russian airstrikes inside Syria, it was journalist Abdel Bari Atwan, appearing on Democracy Now! on Tuesday morning, who offered the latest explanation of why a military solution—whether coordinated between nations or not—simply does not exist for solving the crisis in Syria and Iraq.
“Whenever there is military intervention, whenever there is American intervention in particular, there is failed states,” argued Atwan. “We have more than five failed states in the Middle East. Who will fill the vacuum? The Islamic State. And that’s why they have branches in Egypt, in Sinai, they have branches in Afghanistan, branches in Pakistan, now in a very strong state in Syria.”
It was the “American invasion of the Middle East—Iraq, in particular,” concluded Atwan, that created “the best environment for the Islamic State and for al-Qaeda to continue their savagery, their terrorism, their brutalism against the people of that region.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
The rising seas pose an existential threat to the Pacific Islands, and with them, the irreplaceable cultures and societies they house.
Now, a new report presented Wednesday by the United Nations University and European Union reveals that—among those in Kiribati, Tuvalu, and Nauru willing to consider migration if climate change makes their homes unlivable—the vast majority do not possess the money required to relocate.
In other words, many are trapped in the direct path of climate destruction.
The unprecedented study was presented at the ongoing United Nations COP21 climate talks in Paris and is based on interviews with 6,852 individuals from 852 households in the three island countries.
“More than 70 per cent of households in Kiribati and Tuvalu and 35 per cent of households in Nauru reported family members would migrate if climate stressors, such as droughts, sea-level rise or floods worsened,” a report summary explains. “However, only about a quarter of households have the financial means to support migration, leaving many households ‘trapped’ in worsening environmental conditions.”
In addition, researchers found that the past decade has seen a burst of migration, including 10 percent of Nauru’s population and 15 percent of Tuvalu. However, assuming a “medium climate change scenario,” this displacement is poised to jump by 2055 to 35 percent of Kiribati’s population and a stunning 100 percent of Tuvalu residents, the report concludes.
“The results from this unprecedented survey show us empirically what we already know,” said Enele Sosene Sopoaga, Prime Minister of Tuvalu, in a statement accompanying the report. “Pacific islanders are facing the brunt of climate change impacts and are increasingly finding themselves with few options.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The findings underscore a grim reality that front-lines communities across the world have long pointed out. In addition to the pressing need to aggressively halt climate change, the wealthy nations and people that are disproportionately responsible for carbon emissions owe a debt to help those most impacted deal with the life-threatening consequences—from storms to crop failure to conflict.
However, the Green Climate Fund established by the UN in 2010, in part to assist countries on the front-lines in adapting to climate catastrophe, remains under-funded by richer nations, including the United States. What’s more, in September New Zealand rejected an asylum application from Ioane Teitiota, a Kiribati national who sought refugee status on the grounds that his home is sinking.
Pacific Islanders have been at the forefront of efforts to press the world into more aggressive action. Last October, “climate warriors” from 12 Pacific Island countries paddled traditional canoes into the sea where they blockaded the massive coal port at Newcastle, Australia. And this September, leaders of the smaller Pacific Island nations most vulnerable to rising oceans demanded a “global moratorium on all new coal mines.”
Marshallese poet Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner made waves last September when she opened the UN climate summit in New York with a poem for her daughter, captured in the following video:
Meanwhile, in the streets of Paris and around the world, people from around the world are holding rallies, summits, and ceremonies to demand aggressive international action, rooted in principles of global justice.
“The voices of Indigenous peoples, youth, women and frontline communities need to provide guidance in these negotiations, now more than ever,” the Grassroots Global Justice Alliance said last month ahead of the talks. “Climate justice seeks to address much more than greenhouse gas emissions, but the root systemic causes of climate change itself.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: Rugby league Jerseys
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Scott Armstrong is back in WWE after being furloughed earlier this year.
Armstrong posted a picture of himself backstage at tonight’s NXT TakeOver 31 event.
“Back in the saddle and definitely happy to be a part of the @WWENXT Family!!!” he wrote on Twitter.
Armstrong, the brother of NXT producer Brian Armstrong (Road Dogg) was furloughed in April among wide-ranging cutbacks. At the time, WWE cited the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for the cuts.
Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019
Billy Kidman, who was also furloughed, recently returned to work. Pat Buck was also brought back after initially being furloughed.
Other producers that were furloughed during this period but have not returned to the company include Lance Storm, Mike Rotunda, Fit Finlay, and Shane Helms, among others.
A number of wrestlers were also released in April, who have since gone on to work in other promotions including Luke Gallows and Karl Anderson (Impact) Rusev (Miro in AEW), EC3 (Impact), Zack Ryder (Matt Cardona in AEW), Heath Slater (Impact), Eric Young (Impact), Deonna Purrazzo (Impact),
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
The Bernie Sanders campaign announced Thursday that the Vermont senator has officially received two million contributions, putting him ahead—at this point in the election season—of every other candidate in U.S. history who was not a sitting president.
Top aides say Sanders could even beat President Barack Obama’s 2012 record. “In his run for a second term, reports indicated Obama receiving around 2.2 million contributions by the end of 2011, a figure Sanders still could surpass,” reads a campaign statement.
The average donation this week was $20, in what Sanders says is evidence that he is accountable to “people power”—not corporate contributors.
The number of contributions does not reflect the exact number of donors, as some have given more than once. However, Sanders’ campaign says the number of people pitching in is approaching 1 million, according to the Washington Post.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“Just 261 Sanders backers have given the maximum allowable contribution of $2,700, accounting for a mere 1.7 percent of his campaign’s total reported money raised,” said Sanders’ campaign. “That’s a sharp contrast to Hillary Clinton’s 17,575 maxed-out donors, whose donations accounted for almost 62 percent of her money raised, according to Federal Election Commission records for the first three quarters of this year.”
Filings from Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton show that she continues to be the favorite Democratic candidate of Wall Street, Politico noted in October.
“Over 2 million contributions have been made to the only campaign that rejects a corrupt campaign finance system,” Sanders said in an advertisement thanking donors. “You can’t level the playing field with Wall Street banks and billionaires by taking their money.”
Meanwhile, a poll released Thursday by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Democracy Corps and Every Voice found that 72 percent of people in the U.S. “favor a plan to address the role of money in politics with a small-donor public financing system combined with disclosure for all political spending by outside groups and strictly enforced election laws,” according to a press statement.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Click:ydroxyethyl cellulose HEC
Hoping to show Europeans they have an alternative to the prevailing system of “authoritarianism” and austerity, former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis has announced a new cross-continent movement with a “simple, common agenda:” To democratize Europe.
The movement, known as the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (or DiEM 25), will be launched on February 9 at Berlin’s Volksbühne theater.
Varoufakis, who first revealed the plan late last month in an interview with L’Espresso, said that he is hopeful this “activist movement” will connect progressives across the continent and enable them to take back power from the ruling elite and what he described as the “shadowy world of bureaucrats, bankers, and unelected officialdom.”
“To counter this de-politicisation of political decision making, which reinforces the economic crisis and the crisis of legitimacy facing Europe, we need a movement that rises up throughout in Europe, at once, with the same agenda everywhere to re-politicize political decisions and to democratize the decision making process,” he said in an interview with El Diario published on Saturday.
Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina
“There is no other means by which to arrest the awful feedback between authoritarianism and failed economic policies—a feedback that, left unchecked, will wreck Europe and help ultra-nationalism triumph,” Varoufakis added, referring to the rise of ultra-right and fascist forces such as Greece’s Golden Dawn party.
Varoufakis, who has been a fierce and vocal critic of austerity, stepped down from his post within the Syriza government this summer amid tense negotiations with EU creditors.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The launch of the DiEM 25 movement comes amid a growing leftist surge across Europe. 2015 saw the rise of anti-austerity forces in both the United Kingdom, with the election of Jeremy Corbyn to Labour party leader, as well as in Spain, where the Podemos party gained enormous power.
According to the German socialist paper Neues Deutschland, Varoufakis will be appearing at the launch along with “some of his ‘accomplices’ from all over Europe,” though the complete list of speakers has yet to be announced.
Varoufakis said that the while the exact organizational contours of the movement are still unknown, he is hopeful that the grassroots, cross-border structure will embolden and empower progressives across the continent.
“What makes me optimistic about a pan-European movement? That it will be pan-European!” he said.
“We shall exert pressure on every Parliament, every government, every head of state at once,” Varoufakis continued. “That when the troika is squeezing, let’s say the Madrid government, it will know that the electoral process in, say, Germany or France or Portugal will punish any local politician who does the troika’s bidding.”
“It is a truly utopian undertaking,” he added.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Click:wholesale flowers to china
California’s attorney general has joined New York state in investigating Exxon Mobil’s decades-long climate change cover-up, probing what it knew about global warming, as well as what—and when—the oil giant disclosed to its shareholders and the public, according to the LA Times on Wednesday.
According to “a person close to the investigation,” the office of Attorney General Kamala Harris is looking into “whether Exxon Mobil Corp. repeatedly lied to the public and its shareholders about the risk to its business from climate change—and whether such actions could amount to securities fraud and violations of environmental laws,” the Times writes.
Reporting in the fall of 2015 revealed that Exxon scientists and management knew since the late 1970s that the company’s product was helping drive catastrophic global warming, and responded by spending millions to disseminate disinformation and fund climate denial campaigns. Environmentalist and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben has described it as “the most consequential lie in human history.”
Climate justice groups, along with several current and former U.S. lawmakers and presidential candidates, have called for a Department of Justice investigation into “what Exxon knew.”
And in November, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman catapulted ‘Exxon Knew’ into “the category of truly serious scandals,” as McKibben put it, by issuing the corporation an 18-page subpoena seeking four decades of documents, research findings, and communications related to climate change.
“New York has taken the first step, now other Attorneys General should follow suit to protect the rights of the American people against big polluters from lying to them about climate change and its impacts on our communities,” Greenpeace USA executive director Annie Leonard said at the time.
It seems Harris has heeded that call. While the Times reports that it “is unclear what approach Harris intends to take in California’s investigation,” it adds that her office is “casting a wide net and looking at a variety of issues, according to the person familiar with the matter.”
Union of Concerned Scientists president Ken Kimmel, meanwhile, praised the development as “the latest in a growing movement to uncover the truth, supported by members of Congress, presidential candidates, a former Department of Justice attorney, and more than 60 leaders of major environmental, social justice and Indigenous people’s organizations.”
The news comes on the heels of a unanimous vote last week by the Los Angeles County Democratic Party—California’s largest Democratic organization—to pass a resolution urging Harris “to investigate Exxon Mobil and fellow fossil fuel companies for potential breaches of California law based on their 1970s-era research into the science of climate change, then pouring millions into manufacturing doubt and denial of climate science.”
U.S. Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who has led the charge for Exxon probes, told the Times he hopes the decision by Harris, representing a state with the eighth-largest economy in the world, will prompt other states and the Justice Department to investigate.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Click Here: Putters
“I think this action will be taken very seriously by Exxon Mobil,” Lieu said.
McKibben echoed Lieu’s hope in a statement on Wednesday. “California’s action means that the world’s eighth largest economy is now probing the world’s richest fossil fuel company for lying about the greatest problem the planet ever faced,” he said. “I’d say this means this scandal isn’t going away.”
“With the climate changing at the pace it is,” he added, “we can’t afford for the Department of Justice and Loretta Lynch to dawdle.”
Meanwhile, earlier this week, a group of ExxonMobil shareholders urged the corporation to detail the resilience of its business model to climate change.
“The unprecedented Paris agreement to rein in global warming may significantly affect Exxon’s operations,” New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, who is Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, said in a statement.
“As shareholders, we want to know that Exxon is doing what is needed to prepare for a future with lower carbon emissions,” DeNapoli continued. “The future success of the company, and its investors, requires Exxon to assess how it will perform as the world changes.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 6, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
A bomb blast in the Turkish capital of Ankara on Wednesday—which killed dozens of people and injured scores of others—arrived alongside increasing global worries about how Turkey is responding to shifting developments on the other side of its border with Syria where a brutal civil war and international fight against the Islamic State continues.
Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey
Over the recent days and weeks, the Syrian armed forces of President Bashar al-Assad, backed by Russian airstrikes and the Syrian Kurdish milita known as the YPG, have closed off vital supply routes of ISIS and opposition fighters while capturing long-held territory near the strategically-situated town of Azaz and the rebel stronghold of Aleppo in northwestern Syria.
As Reuters reports:
Turkey has responded to those advances over the weekend by shelling YPG positions inside Syria and openly talking about a ground incursion alongside forces from Saudi Arabia. On Wednesday, Ankara elevated its call for a no-conflict “buffer zone”—one that would extend 10-kilometers (6 miles) from the Turkish border into Syria—as a way to insulate some of those Syrian rebel groups it views as “moderate” allies but which experts have repeatedly pointed out have ties to the Al-Nusra Front, which is the al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria.
“What we want is to create a secure strip, including Azaz, 10 km deep inside Syria and this zone should be free from clashes,” said Deputy Prime Minister Yalcin Akdogan in a television interview.
That plan, however, is in direct opposition to Assad’s stated plan which is to recapture Aleppo and all the surrounding territory in order to cut off the flow of people, weapons, and supplies that it says are funneled over the border from Turkey. As Reuters notes, such a development “would be the government’s biggest victories of the war so far and probably end rebel hopes of overthrowing al-Assad by force, their objective since 2011 with the encouragement of the West, Arab states and Turkey.”
While the Russian foreign ministry condemned Turkey’s shellling, describing it as “total lawlessness” along the border, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan on Wednesday vowed to do whatever it takes to keep the YPG from gaining more territory.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Robert Ellis, an expert on Turkey and contributor to The Independent newspaper, said that calling the current situation “complicated” would be “the understatement of the year” and went on to quote a U.S. policy expert who recently described the festering dynamics between Syria, the U.S., Russia, Turkey, and other regional players as “three-dimensional chess with nine players and no rules.” And as Roy Gutman wrote at Foreign Policy on Tuesday:
In turn, as many experts note, the shifting territorial situation in Syria is finally exposing some of the key contradictions of how the U.S. and its NATO allies in Europe have approached the civil war in Syria. Now, as the YPG and Syrian army continue to make advances, how Turkey responds could have dramatic consequences for all the parties involved. As Joe Lauria, veteran foreign-affairs journalist, explained this week:
Meanwhile, according to journalist Patrick Cockburn, the latest shifts—though soaked in the blood of the Syrian people and not an indication that the overall war against the Islamic State is even close to over—may at least be offering the outlines of an endgame for Syria.
“The war is far from over, but the likely winners and losers are becoming clearer,” wrote Cockburn in a weekend column. “There is going to be no radical regime change in Damascus. The Sunni Arab opposition has failed to win power in Syria and is on the defensive in Iraq. The Kurds in both countries are politically and militarily more powerful than ever because they are effective opponents of Isis, but, once it is defeated, the Kurds fear being marginalised.”
While “regional powers such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar failed to overthrow Assad, and have achieved none of their war aims,” continued Cockburn, the Iranians, Russia, and the Shia coalition that also includes Hezbollah-led fighters from Lebanon have been much more successful inside Syria. Though many criticized Russia for entering the war in such a pronounced way, he concludes, recent events show that decision by President Vladimir Putin “has become central to deciding how the war will end.”
As investigative journalist and columnist Gareth Porter adds in his latest analysis, a “Russian-Syrian success offers the most realistic prospect for an end to the bloodletting in Syria and would also reduce the likelihood of an eventual Al Qaeda seizure of power in Syria.”
But it seems worth repeating: “What happens next is anything but clear.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
October 5, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE is hitting the campaign trail in New Jersey later this month.
Biden will campaign over Memorial Day weekend for Phil Murphy, a Democratic candidate for New Jersey governor, NJ Advance Media reported.
He is scheduled to make an appearance at two events — a private fundraiser and a public rally — in Bergen County on May 28.
Click Here: New Zealand rugby storeADVERTISEMENT
Murphy, who is running to succeed New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), served as the finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 2006 to 2009.
He then served as the U.S. ambassador to Germany under former President Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaHarris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Five ways America would take a hard left under Joe Biden Valerie Jarrett: ‘Democracy depends upon having law enforcement’ MORE from 2009 to 2013.
Murphy is one of six Democratic candidates running for his party’s nomination and has a lead over his primary competitors, according to a poll released earlier this month.
Biden previously said he “regretted” not running for president in 2016. He stoked speculation about a 2020 run with a busy travel schedule, but later said, “Guys, I’m not running.”
October 5, 2020 |
News
| No Comments
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are in a dead heat both nationwide and in Nevada—the next Democratic caucus state and a supposed Clinton stronghold—two polls released Wednesday find.
Nationally, 44 percent of likely Democratic voters support Clinton, and 42 percent support Sanders, with 11 percent undecided, a Quinnipiac University poll found. Respondents said they saw Clinton as having more leadership experience and Sanders as being more trustworthy and honest.
“Sen. Bernie Sanders and Secretary Hillary Clinton are neck and neck,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University poll. “But while Bernie has the trust, Hillary has the experience. Two different measurements of two dissimilar candidates.”
In the unpredictable caucus state of Nevada, a CNN/ORC survey found a similarly narrow split, with likely caucusgoers in the Silver State supporting Clinton 48 percent and Sanders 47 percent.
Click Here: essendon bombers guernsey 2019
In a state still grappling with the effects of the 2008 recession, Nevadans are especially concerned with the economy—an issue in which they favor Sanders—but the poll also found one exceptional factor that makes Saturday’s contest harder than usual to predict: diversity of voters.
CNN reports:
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Clinton had a head start in campaigning, opening up offices in the state months before Sanders—but as the Las Vegas-based political analyst Jon Ralston wrote for the Washington Post on Tuesday, the Clinton camp seems to be growing concerned “about a place once considered a lock for her.”
“It is a lock no more,” Ralston wrote. “[B]uoyed by his landslide victory in New Hampshire, Sanders believes what would previously have been unthinkable: He could win here. The Clinton panic is palpable.”
Still, with Clinton still claiming a narrow lead, the Sanders campaign knows it’s in for an uphill climb, Bloomberg reports:
Tick Segerblom, a state Senator and former Nevada Democratic Party chairman, told Bloomberg, “If Bernie is able to match her, it really shows on his part that he has just really tapped into something. I never dreamed, frankly, that the word ‘socialism’ would actually be acceptable.”
The Quinnipiac poll, which surveyed 563 Democrats between February 10-15, has a margin of error of 4.1 percentage points. The CNN/ORC poll, which surveyed 282 likely Democratic caucusgoers in Nevada from February 10-15, has a margin of error of 6 percentage points.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.