November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Jennifer Hudson and fiancé David Otunga have ended their relationship after ten years.
“They have been in the process of ending their relationship for a number of months,” Hudson’s rep tells People exclusively in a statement.
“Today, Jennifer requested and received a protective order against her ex-fiancé. Jennifer’s actions are solely taken in the best interest of their son,” the statement concluded.
Hudson, 36, and Otunga, 37, are parents to 8-year-old David Daniel Otunga Jr.
Otunga’s attorney, Tracy M. Rizzo, released a statement to People on behalf of the former pro wrestler following the split news.
“Mr. Otunga has never abused or harassed Ms. Hudson or their son, and it is unfortunate, especially in today’s climate, that she would feel the need to make these false allegations against him. Mr. Otunga looks forward to his day in court and in being awarded the residential care of the parties’ only child,” a part of the statement read.
Click Here: State of Origin Jerseys
Former pro wrestler Otunga proposed to Hudson in September 2008 after less than a year of dating. The couple welcomed their only child nearly a year later in August 2009.
About a month after becoming engaged, Hudson’s mother, Darnell Donerson, and her brother, Jason Hudson, were found fatally shot in a Chicago home. Her 7-year-old nephew, Julian King, was found dead in the backseat of a car. Hudson’s former brother-in-law William Balfour was convicted of the murders in 2012.
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Update:
According to the Associated Press, Israeli forces killed four Palestinians—including three teenagers—during anti-occupation protests on Saturday. Over 300 Palestinians were reportedly injured.
Earlier:
Tens of thousands of Palestinians gathered near the Israel-Gaza border fence on Saturday to mark the one-year anniversary of the weekly “Great March of Return” demonstrations and demand an end to Israel’s brutal occupation.
According to Gaza health officials, Israeli forces have so far killed two demonstrators—including a 17-year-old boy named Adham Amaara—and injured dozens more with live ammunition, rubber bullets, and tear gas.
“Thirty-three Palestinians have been evacuated to hospitals in the Strip, including ten that were wounded by live Israeli fire at the border,” Haaretz reported. “Dozens were treated in field clinics erected in tents near the border.”
As Yara Hawari wrote for Middle East Eye, “Protests at the Israeli fence enclosing the territory began on 30 March 2018 to commemorate Land Day, which marks an incident in 1976 when Israeli police shot and killed six Palestinian citizens of Israel who were protesting the expropriation of thousands of dunams of Palestinian land.”
Last year’s protest led to weekly demonstrations each Friday, during which Palestinians have marched to the border fence to demand dignity and an end to occupation.
The mostly peaceful protests have been met with deadly force by the Israeli military, which has killed more than 200 Palestinian demonstrators and injured thousands more over the past year.
In a report published last month, the United Nations said Israel’s use of lethal force against unarmed demonstrators may amount to “war crimes or crimes against humanity.”
“One year on, the Great March of Return protests have become a manifestation of ultimate despair,” wrote Hawari. “The effects of the siege and occupation have left more than half of Palestinians in Gaza living in abject poverty, many with serious mental and physical health conditions.”
“While despair in Gaza continues, so too does the dream of returning home,” she concluded. “This past year, however, has shown us that the costs will be high—particularly if Israel continues to violate Palestinian rights without consequences.”
Click Here: Cheap Golf Golf Clubs
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Female employees who did not flirt with Matt Lauer were not considered “good colleagues” by the disgraced Today co-anchor, a source with knowledge of his workplace conduct tells People.
NBC announced Lauer, 59, had been fired Wednesday after the network received a “detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior” on Monday, with reason to believe “this may not have been an isolated incident.”
“What people need to understand is that there is a flip side to Matt-the-serial-adulterer persona, and that’s all the women he didn’t hook up with—and they didn’t always fare so well,” the source tells People. “So if you were a woman who didn’t seem just utterly charmed by him, or who wasn’t interested in flirting with him, then you were useless to him, and worse, you’d get a target on your back. Period. If you didn’t bat your eyelashes and giggle and banter and play along, then sooner or later you’d get the criticism that you didn’t appear to be supportive of him, that you didn’t have his back, that you weren’t being a proper colleague to him. But that was almost the best case scenario, because that could ostensibly be fixed: you could just decide to kiss up and go along to get along.”
Theo Wargo/WireImage
Click Here: Kenzo Women’s New Collection
“Here’s what was worse: if he flat-out wasn’t interested in you? Then you might as well have been invisible,” the source adds. “For the most part, women served no purpose for him unless he was attracted to them. So if he wasn’t hot for you, it was only a matter of time before you’d become more and more marginalized. You were damned if you did and damned if you didn’t.”
PEOPLE previously reported that Lauer allegedly cheated on his wife Annette with multiple women. Since the news broke, two more women have accused him of sexual harassment, and a former NBC employee alleged to The New York Times that he sexually assaulted her in 2001.
“If you’re a PA fetching coffee for him, you’d better know how to flirt,” People‘s source adds. “If you’re a new producer working on second-hour segments, you’d better know how to flirt. And if he deemed you to be not his type and didn’t want to flirt? Then you’d better not be counting on him to have the first idea who you even are. And certainly not to have your back if you ever want a promotion or anything like that.”
An NBC spokesperson previously told People in a statement, “We can say unequivocally, that, prior to Monday night, current NBC News management was never made aware of any complaints about Matt Lauer’s conduct.”
Lauer, who joined the network in 1992 as a newsreader on Today, had been co-anchor of the morning show since January 1997 and reportedly signed a $20 million dollar contract last year.
RELATED: A Look at Matt Lauer’s History, Following His Firing from the Today Show
He addressed the allegations for the first time in a statement Thursday.
“There are no words to express my sorrow and regret for the pain I have caused others by words and actions,” Lauer said. “To the people I have hurt, I am truly sorry. As I am writing this, I realize the depth of the damage and disappointment I have left behind at home and at NBC.”
“Some of what is being said about me is untrue or mischaracterized, but there is enough truth in these stories to make me feel embarrassed and ashamed,” he added. “I regret that my shame is now shared by the people I cherish dearly.”
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
The British Parliament’s petitions website crashed Thursday morning as over a million of Britons attempted to make their opposition to Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit plan known.
Hours after May chastised members of Parliament for rejecting her Brexit plan a second time, an anti-Brexit petition was gathering about 1,500 signatures per minute when it crashed the website for 40 minutes. The site then briefly went up before failing again.
As of this writing, more than one million people had signed the petition demanding that May’s invocation of Article 50 of the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty, which allows a country to formally withdraw from the EU, be revoked.
“The government repeatedly claims exiting the E.U. is the will of the people,” reads the petition. “We need to put a stop to this claim by proving the strength of public support now for remaining in the E.U. A people’s vote may not happen, so vote now.”
The petition quickly reached the 100,000-signature threshold to force a debate in Parliament over the proposal after being posted on the government website Wednesday evening.
The site crashed as May was headed to Brussels to ask that the E.U. give her an extension for formalizing Brexit till June 30. May had originally planned for the U.K. to officially leave the E.U. by March 29, but Parliament has twice rejected her plan by wide margins in the past two months, most recently in a 242-391 vote on March 12.
May’s current plan involves a “soft” version of the Brexit plan, which 52 percent of voters in the United Kingdom supported in a June 2016 referendum.
In contrast to a “hard” deal which would have involved a complete withdrawal from the E.U., May’s deal would include less stringent controls on immigration into the U.K. and would retain its participation in the E.U.’s single market.
Critics of May’s deal argue that a “soft” Brexit would still damage the nation’s economy.
As Jen Kirby explained at Vox last November after May reached her deal with the E.U., “every political camp within the UK has found something to hate in this agreement”:
The hardline “Brexiteers” in her party are virulently opposed—though it’s unlikely they’d be pleased by any deal. They see May’s deal as preventing the U.K. from reclaiming control of its borders and laws, and blocking it from making trade deals with other countries…
Labour has its own disagreements about Brexit within the party, but it has collectively rejected May’s deal, saying it doesn’t meet their required pillars for a satisfactory Brexit…
The bottom line: Few are satisfied with this compromise, because the U.K. is splintered between those who want out of the E.U. and those who never wanted to leave in the first place. No side actually “wins” with this deal.
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn called May’s continued attempts to salvage the deal and move towards a withdrawal from the E.U. in June “unacceptable and reckless.”
Before Parliament rejected May’s deal for a first time in January—by the largest margin in the British government’s history—Corbyn was among those who called for a new election if the plan failed.
On social media, other critics called for a new Brexit referndum and new elections as a way to put controversy behind the country.
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
If you’ve watched (and re-watched) the iconic ’00s movie Mean Girls time and time again, we’ve got news that’s basically the definition of “so fetch!”
Lindsay Lohan herself is down for a Mean Girls sequel, and she’s starting to call on her former co-stars to get on board.
“Mean Girls 2 the movie—this is the importance. We need Rachel McAdams! We need the whole cast back!” Lohan said to E! News on a red carpet Wednesday. “I’d love to do it again. We had so much fun making it. Mark Waters is such a great director, Tina Fey is an amazing writer, Paramount was great to work with—we all had a blast.”
Paramount
Lohan has been talking about a potential sequel for more than a year now, but her persistence might be paying off. Some of her co-stars have mentioned a reunion, including Lohan’s on-screen love Jonathan Bennett, who played Aaron Samuels.
“The reason this movie did so well is because of the fans and I feel like they want it so badly that I would love to do a sequel with everyone, especially with Lindsay,” Bennett told TooFab in September. “You know, I’d love to work with Lindsay on something soon.”
He’s not the only one either. Even Tina Fey might be on board. Fey is currently working to take the movie to the Broadway stage in April, but she hasn’t ruled out a second round on screen, even though her first response was a firm no.
RELATED: Aaron Samuels from Mean Girls Has an Equally Dreamy New Boyfriend
“Paramount was very generous and solicitous with me for several years, saying, ‘Would you like to do it?'” Fey said to Movieline in 2010. “And at the time, I was like, ‘They should just let it be what it is!'”
After a straight-to-DVD sequel was released without her (or Lohan’s) involvement, Fey had some regrets.
“Now, it’s like, why not just do it?” she said. “I should have done it, because now it’s happening anyway!”
There’s still time, Tina!
Click Here: gold coast suns 2019 guernsey
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
At 51 years old, Cindy Crawford has seen it all.
The retired supermodel has been an icon in the fashion industry since she was just 16, and her daughter, Kaia Gerber, now 16 herself, just wrapped her first fashion season and was lucky enough to have her famous mom by her side through it all. Now, watching her daughter follow a path similar to her own, Crawford harbors no illusions about the oddities of the modeling industry and struggles of growing old in an industry that celebrates youth.
In a charmingly candid interview with The Cut, the timeless beauty revealed the unexpected benefits she got out of her life in front of the camera. “The thing about modeling is that there’s no pretense that it’s about anything else. Nobody really talks about a model’s personality,” Crawford said. “It’s like, she’s either good for the job or she isn’t. Maybe they’ll talk about how she moves, but it’s definitely a job where everyone understands what it is. In some weird ways, it’s very black and white, and I like that.”
“But it’s a big motivator,” she continued. “That’s why I started working out when I was 20 years old because I needed to get fit. When I was 28, I started thinking about really taking care of my skin and knowing that I’m not going to have 20-year-old skin forever. In a weird way, it’s been great for me because working out, having a trainer, getting a facial once a month—those things never felt extravagant because they felt like part of my job. They just felt like me taking care of my instrument.”
RELATED: Kaia Gerber Doesn’t Think She Looks Anything Like Mom Cindy Crawford
Even though she’s been kind to her instrument, Crawford knows it’s not the same. “You feel a little apologetic that you can’t deliver in the same way that you could when you were 20 or 25,” she said of doing photo shoots in her 50s. “Everything changes: your skin, your hair, and your body. I take care of myself but I know that I’m a 51-year-old woman. There are times when that’s hard and I’m also sure it’s hard for my sisters who aren’t models. I want to do my job well, and I want to deliver but I also know that what I have to offer now is different from what I had to offer at 25.”
These are woes her daughter Kaia won’t face for another decade or two. “Kaia can wake up and even if she’s puffy from having sushi the night before, her face goes back to normal in 15 minutes,” Crawford noted. “For me, I wouldn’t even eat that now because it would take the whole day for it to go down. When I look at my friends, I look at how beautiful they are and don’t pick them apart. I think to be kind to ourselves as women, we should try to look at ourselves through our friends’ eyes as opposed to the super hyper-critical eye that we usually turn on ourselves.”
Click Here: new zealand rugby team jerseys
As for her beauty secrets? According to Crawford, there are none. “We all know: Get enough sleep, drink water, don’t smoke,” she said. “We all know those things—the secret is doing it consistently.”
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Ahead of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland next week—which convenes the world’s wealthiest and most powerful for a summit that’s been called both the “money Oscars” and a “threat to democracy”—the group published a report declaring, “Of all risks, it is in relation to the environment that the world is most clearly sleepwalking into catastrophe.”
The policies of global deregulation, privatization, unending consumption, and growth-worship that you advanced so aggressively in order to construct the Davos Class marched us here.”
—Naomi Klein, author and activist
While WEF has made a habit of recognizing the threat posed by the human-made climate crisis in its Global Risks reports—for which it has garnered some praise—author and activist Naomi Klein was quick to challenge the narrative presented in the latest edition (pdf), pointing out that many of the polices pushed by the very people invited to the exclusive event have driven the global crisis.
“Sleepwalking? Nah. The policies of global deregulation, privatization, unending consumption, and growth-worship that you advanced so aggressively in order to construct the Davos Class marched us here,” she tweeted. “Pretty sure your eyes were wide open.”
While Klein—who argued in her 2014 book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate that “our economic system and our planetary system are now at war”—brought a critical eye to the report’s warnings about the dangers of failing to limit global warming, others welcomed the attention given to the crucial issue.
WEF’s Global Risks Perception Survey solicits input from nearly 1,000 “decision-makers” across government, big business, academia, and civil society, and aims to identify both short- and long-term threats to the international community.
“Extreme weather was the risk of greatest concern, but our survey respondents are increasingly worried about environmental policy failure.”
—WEF report
Environmental threats—including extreme weather, failure of climate-change mitigation and adaptation, natural disasters, biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse, and man-made environmental disasters—dominate the top 10 lists for both likelihood and impact.
“Extreme weather was the risk of greatest concern, but our survey respondents are increasingly worried about environmental policy failure,” the report notes, acknowledging that “biodiversity loss is affecting health and socioeconomic development, with implications for well-being, productivity, and even regional security.”
Responding in a statement, Marco Lambertini, director general of World Wildlife Fund (WWF) International, said: “Recognition of the dangers posed by climate change and biodiversity loss is not enough. The science is clear: we need to see urgent and unprecedented action now.”
“The consequences of not changing course are enormous not just for nature, but for humans. We depend on nature much more than nature depends on us,” Lambertini added. “Global political and business leaders know that they have a major role to play in safeguarding the future of economies, businesses, and the natural resources we depend on.”
“Recognition of the dangers posed by climate change and biodiversity loss is not enough. The science is clear: we need to see urgent and unprecedented action now.”
—Marco Lambertini, WWF International
Concerns about governmental failure to adequately address the climate crisis declined among “the Davos Class” after world leaders came together to sign the Paris agreement, according to Reuters. But that changed after President Donald Trump took office and announced plans to ditch the accord, which aims to limit warming within this century to 1.5°C—a goal that experts say would require immediately phasing out fossil fuels.
Additionally, as Aengus Collins, the WEF report’s author, told Reuters, “People… are beginning to understand increasingly the gravity of the situation and that the Paris agreement, even if fully implemented, cannot be seen as a panacea.”
In October, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) put out a report detailing what the world could look like with that level of warming, and demanding “rapid, far-reaching, and unprecedented” systemic reforms. That report has been followed by various studies outlining how the United States is “drilling toward disaster” with fossil fuel expansion while the oceans are warming and ice is melting at alarming rates.
Along with rising sea levels, the crisis has also featured devastating hurricanes, heatwaves, and wildfires. One analysis of last year’s costliest climate-driven extreme weather events estimated that the top 10 storms, droughts, fires, and floods of 2018 caused at least $84.8 billion in damage, almost certainly an underestimate. Experts warn that as the planet warms, such events will become more common and powerful.
Despite warnings from the global scientific community and mounting public demands for a Green New Deal, Trump and his backers continue to downplay the threat and attack climate and environmental regulations. Although the president no longer plans to attend the Davos meeting due to the government shutdown he has forced over border wall funding, five members of his administration are supposedly still set to attend.
Regardless of whether the government reopens by next week, CNBC reports that “Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will lead the five-strong delegation which also includes Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross; U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer; and Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Coordination, Chris Liddell.”
Click Here: Cardiff Blues Store
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Chrissy Teigen’s baby bump has really popped! After announcing that she and husband John Legend are expecting their second child this afternoon, the model-turned-cookbook author took to her Snapchat to share a mirror selfie that shows off her growing stomach, and the mom-to-be is glowing.
In the pic she shared from her camera roll, Teigen poses in front of a mirror in her closet wearing a figure-hugging strapless black maxi dress. “Very excited to not have to hide this anymore,” she wrote over the photo. “Everyone I told was like ‘uh yeah, we know thanks.”
Chrissy Teigen/Snapchat
RELATED: Chrissy Teigen Is Pregnant! Watch Baby Luna’s Video Annoucement
Now that she will no longer have to hide her growing baby bump, we can’t wait to see all of the standout maternity looks that she’ll wear while pregnant with baby number two.
In the meantime, we’ll just be over here watching her daughter Luna adorably reveal that Chrissy is pregnant in their too cute baby announcement.
Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Although the brutal assassination of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi may have begun to recede from the American public consciousness, Washington has clearly not moved on. In fact, the new Democratic majority in the House is poised, in partnership with key Senate leaders, to advance a bold agenda to bring accountability to the U.S. relationship with Saudi Arabia and finally reassert congressional oversight of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
In no place is congressional action more urgent than in Yemen, where approximately half of the population—nearly 14 million people—remain on the brink of starvation due to the war and the ensuing economic collapse in the country. Although congressional pressure caused the Trump administration to finally call for an end to the war last October and cut off U.S. refueling support in November, the United States remains intimately involved in the Saudi- and UAE-led military operations in the country.
Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership
“Congressional action can finally begin not only to reorient U.S. foreign policy from an ineffective and destructive military-first approach but also help bring the parties to the conflict in Yemen to the negotiating table to the find a political solution on which so many Yemeni lives depend.”
The newly minted House Foreign Affairs Committee’s first priority was to follow up on the Senate’s unprecedented passage of the war powers resolution on Yemen last December that positively influenced ceasefire negotiations in Sweden. It did so by marking up Congressmen Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Mark Pocan’s (D-WI) (along with 68 bipartisan colleagues) war powers resolution on Yemen. The committee reported the resolution favorably out of committee this week, and there may be a floor vote by the end of February.
Senators Sanders (I-VT), Lee (R-UT), and Murphy (D-CT) have also reintroduced their war powers resolution, setting up another Senate vote to send the legislation to the president’s desk. Should the resolution pass both chambers as it is likely to do, it will set up a confrontation with Trump. He will have to decide whether to listen to the will of Congress in asserting its constitutional authority over matters of war or side with the Saudi and Emirati governments, whose support his administration views as essential to pursuing its primary goal of military confrontation with Iran.
Even if Trump vetoes the war powers resolution, passage in both chambers of Congress will continue to signal much-needed pressure to the Saudi-led coalition that a political solution is the only acceptable resolution to this conflict. It will also indicate that U.S. support for their indefinite military adventurism, which relies on collective punishment of civilians, is not a blank check. Although the December ceasefire and confidence-building agreement made in Stockholm remains precarious, further congressional pressure can have a positive effect in support of UN Special Envoy Martin Griffiths’ shuttle diplomacy.
Should Trump decide to ignore the will of Congress, it will also provide the impetus Congress needs to take further action to limit U.S. military cooperation with Saudi Arabia and the UAE in Yemen. A variety of legislative initiatives lie at Congress’ disposal and many have already been initiated.
Congressmen Ted Lieu (D-CA), Ted Yoho (R-FL), and Tom Malinowski (D-NJ) have introduced a stand-alone bill to permanently prohibit U.S. in-flight refueling to the Saudi-led coalition, thereby preventing the Pentagon from reversing its earlier decision to cut off this support. House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-MA) introduced legislation to punish Saudi Arabia for its murder of Jamal Khashoggi by ending all weapons sales and security cooperation with the country unless high-bar conditions are met. Meanwhile, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and Senator Todd Young (R-IN) have reintroduced their Saudi Arabia Accountability and Yemen Act, which is a positive first step towards a comprehensive reformation of the U.S.-Saudi relationship and U.S. policy in Yemen, and includes sanctions for Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, a permanent end to refueling for the Yemen military coalition, and a nearly two-year suspension of air-to-ground munitions to Saudi Arabia.
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-WA), an advocate for ending U.S. support for the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen, can and should include many of these provisions in his base text for this year’s National Defense Authorization Act. He should also require a DoD Inspector General investigation into U.S. involvement in torture and other human rights abuses in UAE-run prisons in Yemen, and prevent U.S. complicity in foreign military partners’ human rights abuses by expanding the Department of Defense’s Leahy Law to apply to any advise, assist, accompany, or support activity undertaken by the U.S. military. Similarly, Eliot Engel (D-NY), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, should build on Senator Menendez’s continuing informal hold on further sales of precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia and the UAE by advancing legislation to permanently ban the sale of such weapons for a period of at least two years.
Following this week’s reporting that Saudi Arabia and the UAE are actively diverting U.S.-sold weapons to al-Qaeda-linked and hardline Salafist militias in Yemen—reportedly in violation of U.S. end-use agreements and in addition to their already documented cooperation with al-Qaeda in the country—it’s clear that Congress must place strong human rights conditions on the U.S. military relationship with Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Evidence continues to mount that their activities in Yemen not only violate international and U.S. domestic law, but also undermine U.S. national security interests by destabilizing the region and grossly violating U.S. values in the process.
Such congressional action can finally begin not only to reorient U.S. foreign policy from an ineffective and destructive military-first approach but also help bring the parties to the conflict in Yemen to the negotiating table to the find a political solution on which so many Yemeni lives depend. It’s encouraging that majorities in both chambers of Congress finally appear poised to act with this in mind.
Kate Kizer (@KateKizer) is the policy director at Win Without War, which seeks to establish a more progressive U.S. foreign policy and national security strategy. Previously she was the director of policy and advocacy at the Yemen Peace Project, a non-profit that advocates for the rights and interests of Yemeni Americans and for constructive U.S. policies toward Yemen.
November 11, 2019 |
News
| No Comments
Something’s cooking for Gail Simmons: a new baby!
The Canadian Top Chef judge and newly minted cookbook author is pregnant with her second child, her rep confirms to People exclusively.
Simmons and her husband, music executive Jeremy Abrams, are already parents to daughter Dahlia Rae, 4 this month.
“We are thrilled that a sibling is on the way for our daughter Dahlia Rae, who is almost 4,” Simmons tells People of her exciting news.
VIDEO: Victoria’s Secret Models Reveal Their Post-Show Splurges
Simmons—author of Talking with My Mouth Full: My Life as a Professional Eater and a new cookbook, Bringing it Home: Favorite Recipes from a Life of Adventurous Eating—wed Abrams in 2008.
The couple welcomed Dahlia in December 2013, after not knowing whether they would be expecting a son or daughter for their first child.
“We’d like it to be a surprise,” Simmons, 41, told People of the baby’s sex ahead of her birth. “We have some of the nursery done, but we’re going to wait until [we find out] who this little nugget is.”
RELATED: Coco Rocha Is Pregnant with Second Child!
If the baby on the way is anything like their big sister, their taste buds will develop preferences pretty early in life. As Simmons explained to People in 2015, “[Dahlia’s] favorite things these days are mushrooms and olives.”
“‘Mama, olive?’” the star mimicked her daughter, adding that she also has an affinity for peaches. “She opens the fridge and stands there and tries to reach for the olive jar.”
Top Chef season 15 premieres Thursday at 10 p.m. EST / 9 p.m. CST on Bravo.
—reporting by Ana Calderone
Click Here: IQOS White